Vasopressor

The Canadian Critical Care Comparative Effectiveness Platform(e) d'Évaluation Clinique Comparée en soins Critiques (CEPEC) is an international multi-centered randomized adaptive platform clinical trial. CEPEC will evaluate supportive care interventions that are used routinely in intensive care units throughout the world.

Spinal anesthesia is the preferred regional technique in obstetric practice because it provides high maternal satisfaction and eliminates the need for airway manipulation. Despite these advantages, it is frequently complicated by spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension , defined as a reduction in systolic blood pressure of more than 20% from baseline or an absolute SBP below 100 mmHg. Spinal hypotension can have serious consequences, including maternal hypoperfusion that may lead to neurological or renal dysfunction, as well as fetal acidosis and bradycardia, which can compromise neonatal outcomes. The present study aims to evaluate the effect of preoperative caffeine administration on noradrenaline requirements during spinal anesthesia in obstetric patients. Specifically, the objectives are to compare noradrenaline requirements between the study groups and to assess the incidence of hypotension in both groups.

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), one of the leading causes of pulmonary hypertension (PH), is caused by the chronic obstruction of the pulmonary arteries following episode of pulmonary embolism. It is the only cause of PH which is accessible to a potential curative surgical treatment: the pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA). Because of their underlying disease (pulmonary hypertension and potential right heart dysfunction), anesthesia should be performed cautiously. Perioperative hemodynamic management often requires the administration of a vasopressor to maintain the arterial pressure above a specific threshold of 65 mmHg. Low dose of vasopressin increases systemic arterial pressure with minimal effects on the pulmonary circulation. This profile suggests that vasopressin may be an ideal agent for vasopressor support in the high-risk population of patients with pulmonary hypertension. To date, there is no data on the use of vasopressin in patient undergoing PEA surgery. The interesting properties of vasopressin - specifically, its ability to increase systemic arterial resistance while having a low impact on pulmonary resistance and offering potential renal protective effects - are highly advantageous in the specific subset of patient scheduled for PEA. The investigators aim to conduct a randomized single center open label study to compare the effect of vasopressin compared to norepinephrine on mean pulmonary artery pressure after PEA surgery. The primary objective of this study is to determine whether the use of vasopressin compared to norepinephrine decrease the mean pulmonary artery pressure after PEA surgery. Participation to the study involves follow up at day 30 following surgery.

Low blood pressure, also known as hypotension, is very common during major surgery under general anesthesia. Prolonged or severe hypotension can lead to complications such as kidney injury after surgery that slow down patient recovery. Anesthesiologists commonly administer medications called vasopressors to treat low blood pressure during surgery. These medications help raise the blood pressure back up to a safe range. Two vasopressor medications are commonly used for this purpose: norepinephrine and phenylephrine. Each of these medications has slightly different effects on the heart and blood vessels (cardiovascular system). It remains unknown which of these standard medications is better for treating low blood pressure during surgery. The goal of this clinical trial is to determine which of these two medications is better at preventing injury to the kidneys after major noncardiac surgery as well as other complications such as heart problems. Major surgeries are defined as those lasting at least two hours under general anesthesia. This trial will randomize about ten centers in North America to use either norepinephrine or phenylephrine as the primary medication to treat low blood pressure in adults undergoing major noncardiac surgery. Each hospital will prioritize one of the drugs each month, and the assigned drug will rotate each month at each hospital. No further participant involvement will be required as de-identified data are collected as part of standard medical care.

The goal of this clinical trial is to demonstrate the importance of arterial pressure measurement sites during major abdominal surgeries. This randomized controlled trial will compare arterial pressure measurements obtained from radial artery catheterization (the current standard method of monitoring) with those obtained from brachial artery catheterization (a more accurate reflection of central arterial pressure). At the end of the study, we are looking to answer the following questions: 1. Does arterial pressure measurement sites influence the amount of vasopressors that is administered during major abdominal surgeries? 2. What are the instances where there is a difference between peripheral (radial catheter) and central (brachial catheter) monitoring and what are the risk factors leading to the appearance of this radial-brachial pressure gradient? 3. With the data collected, can artificial intelligence based analysis help predict the reliability of a radial monitoring and help guide clinicians on choosing a peripheral versus central arterial pressure monitoring site? All adult participants who are scheduled for elective major abdominal surgeries and meeting our inclusion criteria will be approached and included if they consent. Participants will be randomized 1:1 in the intervention group and the standard of care group. In the intervention group, the brachial arterial line will be used intraoperatively to guide vasopressor and fluid administration. A radial line will also be installed to measure the radial arterial pressure simultaneously, but will not be used to guide hemodynamic management. In the standard of care group, both lines will be installed just like in the intervention group, however, it is the radial arterial line that will guide fluid and vasopressor administration. In both groups, the anesthesia protocol will be standardized and the anesthesiologist will be blinded to the arterial pressure measurement site.

In this thesis we will use the current state of knowledge that PI can provide a reliable information about the state of peripheral microcirculation during the state of sepsis and septic shock in ICU patients and that can interfere with the timing of starting vasopressor treatment in sepsis and septic shock