Vital Sign Monitoring

4

Review clinical trials related to Vital Sign Monitoring. Use filters to narrow results by trial status, phase, treatment, biological sex and sponsor.

Condition / disease
Location
Status: Not yet recruiting

Neonatal Wireless Transmission System: Hospital Adoption and Planning for Implementation Study

To explore the feasibility, acceptability, and implementation considerations associated with the adoption of the NeWTS system within NHS neonatal services.

Participants needed: 50
Trial details
Age: 18-65Biological sex: AllType: ObservationalSponsor: Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustUpdated: Jun 16, 2026
Eligibility criteria

staff with experience of working or supporting NICU care Informed consent

no informed consent

Status: Recruiting

Continuous Vital Sign Monitoring Versus Routine Spot-checks in Patients After Non-cardiac Surgery

The "COME ON, NOW!" trial is a randomized, single-center trial in patients recovering from non-cardiac surgery on normal wards investigating whether continuous vital sign monitoring - compared to routine spot-checks by nurses - reduces the total duration of abnormal vital signs per hour during the first 48 hours after admission to the normal ward.

Participants needed: 264
Trial details
Age: 45+Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfUpdated: Mar 2, 2026Locations: 1
Eligibility criteria

Emergency surgery [+4]

Status: Recruiting

Effect of ANNE One-Wellue Device Array Use on Staff Bedside Vital Sign Measurement Activity

Randomized controlled trial of a time motion study of time spent obtaining and charting vital signs for inpatients, comparing use of a wireless Bluetooth vital sign array as intervention versus routine vital sign obtainment activity on a general medical floor.

Participants needed: 270
Trial details
Age: 18+Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: Northwestern UniversityUpdated: Jun 5, 2025Locations: 2
Eligibility criteria

Inpatients admitted to Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Feinberg Unit 16 West.

Primary language other than English, under isolation status, pregnant patients,...

Status: Recruiting

The Effect of Two Different Bathing Methods on Vital Signs and Comfort in PICU:Bath Trial

The study was planned to be conducted and completed within 6 months after ethics committee approval was obtained. The study is a prospective, quasi-experimental study. The population of the study will consist of children who are hospitalized in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit of SBÜ. İzmir Dr. Behçet Uz Pediatric Diseases and Surgery Training and Research Hospital. The vital signs and comfort of the children of the parents who agreed to participate in the study will be measured before bathing (baseline) and care will be taken to ensure that they are similar in both groups. Children in the study will not be randomized. In the routine operation of the clinic, traditional bathing is performed once a week and wipe bathing is performed once every two days. Wipe bathing is performed at 36-37 degrees water with 10 ml of chlorhexidine in 200 ml of water. Traditional bathing is also performed with 36-37 degrees water in bed or in the bathtub. In the study, no intervention will be performed and the outcomes will be measured and compared with each other before and after both bathing procedures. Physiologic parameters including respiratory rate, pulse rate, oxygen saturation and comfort levels of newborns just before, during and after the bathing process (1st and 5th minute) will be evaluated and compared with each other. To avoid bias in the study, all bathing procedures will be performed by Specialist Nurse Esat Erdem GÖKPINAR. Translated with DeepL.com (free version)

Participants needed: 52
Trial details
Age: 28-18Biological sex: AllType: ObservationalSponsor: Izmir Katip Celebi UniversityUpdated: May 7, 2025Locations: 1
Eligibility criteria

Being hospitalized in Behçet Uz Pediatric Intensive Care Unit [+2]

Having a contraindication to bathing [+1]