Wound Dehiscence

This is a multi-center, pragmatic, parallel arm randomized controlled trial (RCT) of 352 patients with high-risk open or closed tibial plateau fracture, high-risk open or closed tibial pilon fracture, or open tibial shaft fracture with incision \>3cm. Eligible participants will be randomized to receive either incisional negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) or a non-suction standard-of-care wound dressing for their definitive wound management. The primary outcome will be a composite outcome to evaluate clinical status 3 months after randomization.

The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel hydrogel made of Carbopol® 940 functionalized with Plasma-Activated Water (PAW) in patients with chronic wounds (diabetic foot ulcers, pressure injuries, dehiscent wounds, arterial and venous ulcers). The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does PAW-hydrogel accelerate wound closure (reduction in surface area) compared to standard advanced wound care? * Does PAW-hydrogel reduce bacterial load in the wound bed? * Is PAW-hydrogel safe and well-tolerated (local adverse events, pain)? Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: * Experimental group: Topical application of PAW-hydrogel (Carbopol® 940 neutralized to pH 5.5, loaded with reactive oxygen and nitrogen species from plasma activation) 2-3 times per week. * Control group: Standard advanced wound care (cleaning, debridement, conventional dressings). Wound area (planimetry), bacterial load (semi-quantitative cultures), pain (Visual Analog Scale), tissue quality (Bates-Jensen scale), and adverse events will be assessed over a 12-week follow-up period.

The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) in adults undergoing emergency laparotomy. The main question it aims to answer is: Does NPWT decrease wound complications? Researchers will compare it against regular dressings to see if NPWT is superior.

This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the outcomes of Polyglactin (Vicryl) versus Polypropylene (Prolene) sutures for rectus sheath closure in patients undergoing midline laparotomy. The study will evaluate the rates of incisional hernia, surgical site infection (SSI), wound dehiscence, chronic pain, and suture sinus formation. Participants aged 18-70 years, undergoing either elective or emergency laparotomy, will be randomly assigned to receive either Polyglactin or Polypropylene sutures. The primary outcome measure is the incidence of incisional hernia at 6 months, with secondary outcomes including SSI, wound complications, and chronic pain. The study is particularly important in the context of Pakistan, where such comparative data is limited, and aims to provide evidence-based recommendations for optimal suture material selection in general surgery.