Clinical trials

This study investigates the relationship between the thickness of deep scar tissue and residual weakness in the calf muscles of patients who have recovered from a condition known as "tennis leg." Tennis leg is a common calf muscle injury caused by a partial tear of the inner part of the gastrocnemius (calf) muscle at the point where muscle meets tendon. While patients often return to daily activities after healing, many continue to experience hidden weakness in their calf muscles, particularly during activities that require the muscle to lengthen under load (eccentric contractions), such as walking downhill, running, or landing from a jump. This study uses diagnostic ultrasound imaging to measure the thickness of scar tissue that forms inside the muscle after injury. It also uses an isokinetic dynamometer to objectively measure the eccentric (lengthening) strength of the calf muscles. By comparing the injured leg to the uninjured leg in the same person, the study determines whether patients with thicker scar tissue have greater residual strength deficits. The study enrolls adults aged 18 to 40 years who have had a confirmed unilateral calf muscle tear at least 3 months ago and have returned to normal daily activities. No treatment or intervention is provided. All assessments are performed at a single time point. Understanding how scar tissue relates to persistent muscle weakness could help clinicians better predict long-term outcomes, design more effective rehabilitation programs, and make more informed decisions about when patients are ready to return to sport and physical activity.

What is the relationship between frontal and axial back asymmetric parameters with self body image in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis Age This study will investigate the relationship between frontal and axial back asymmetry with self body image in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis Delimitations : patients will be diagnosed by orthopedic surgeon with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis Delimitations Age 11 to 18 years BMI fron 20 to 24.9kg/m2 Moderate cobbs angle 25-45 degrees Major thoacic curve Self body image will be ass by TAPS questionnaire which evaluate self image and satisfaction

This single-center, parallel-group randomized controlled trial (RCT) will compare two timings for initiating specific exercise therapy after breast cancer surgery. The study tests whether early initiation (within the first postoperative week) versus delayed initiation (at 3 weeks postoperative) results in superior upper limb function at 6 months as measured by the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. Secondary outcomes include pain intensity (Visual Analog Scale, VAS) and wound-related complications such as drainage time and hematoma incidence.

This randomized controlled trial (RCT) aims to evaluate the effectiveness of two different structured exercise interventions compared to standard care during active diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) treatment. Participants will be allocated to one of three groups: Upper Body Exercise (UBE), Combined Exercise (CE), or Standard Care Control (SC). The interventions are designed to improve cardiorespiratory fitness-as measured by changes in VO₂peak-and other secondary clinical, metabolic, vascular, inflammatory, muscular, and quality-of-life outcomes while ensuring proper offloading and wound management.

This study compares three common treatments for frozen shoulder when added to a standard exercise program: High-Intensity Laser Therapy (HILT), a corticosteroid (steroid) injection into the shoulder joint, and hands-on manual therapy by a physical therapist. A fourth group will receive only the standard exercise program. The goal is to see which combination works best to reduce shoulder pain and improve shoulder function over 6 months. The main outcomes are changes in pain (VAS scale) and shoulder disability (SPADI questionnaire) at 12 weeks.

This study aims to find the best settings (dose) for High-Intensity Laser Therapy (HILT) to reduce pain and improve function in people with moderate knee osteoarthritis. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive one of three different doses of HILT (low, medium, or high) or a sham (placebo) laser treatment, three times a week for four weeks. The main outcomes measured will be changes in knee pain (using a pain scale) and knee function (using a questionnaire) from the beginning to the end of the 4-week treatment period.

This single-blinded, randomized controlled trial (RCT) will evaluate the added benefit of mechanical modalities (continuous passive motion (CPM) and intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC)) when integrated into standard therapy for managing postoperative edema and pain in patients undergoing distal radius fracture (DRF) fixation. The primary outcomes are edema volume (measured via volumeter) and pain intensity (Numeric Pain Rating Scale, NPRS) at 6 weeks post-operation. Secondary outcomes include wrist/forearm range of motion (ROM), grip strength, Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), and adverse events.

This randomized controlled trial will compare the effectiveness of static progressive splinting versus dynamic splinting for treating persistent wrist stiffness in adults ≥18 years old at least 8 weeks post distal radius fracture (DRF) injury. Both splinting modalities are provided as an adjunct to one weekly supervised therapy session over a 6-week period. The primary outcomes are wrist active and passive range of motion (AROM/PROM) measured using goniometry, with secondary outcomes including patient-reported wrist function (PRWE), overall satisfaction, and adverse events.

This three-arm, parallel-group RCT will compare the effectiveness of three rehabilitation strategies following conservative treatment of an uncomplicated distal radius fracture in adults under 50 years old. The study will compare: Supervised Therapy: Outpatient physical therapy sessions plus a daily home exercise program Home-Based Program: A structured, detailed home exercise program with weekly telephone follow-up No Therapy (minimal intervention): Standard minimal instruction via an educational brochure The primary outcome is the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) measured at 6 weeks and 6 months.

This study compares a new, consensus-based physiotherapy program to standard physiotherapy for people with fibromyalgia. The new program uses recommendations from experts, including education about pain, personalized exercise, and strategies to improve coping skills. We will measure how much pain people have, how well they can function, and their beliefs about pain. The goal is to see if the new program is better than standard care at reducing pain and improving function in individuals with fibromyalgia.

This multi-center randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluates the long-term (12-month) effectiveness of a standardized multidisciplinary physiotherapy program versus standard care on persistent pain, upper limb (UL) dysfunction, and cancer-related fatigue (CRF) in breast cancer survivors. The study also examines improvements in quality of life and psychological well-being. The standardized intervention combines specific exercise therapy, manual therapy, education, and mind-body interventions and is designed to produce sustained benefits beyond the acute rehabilitation phase.

This randomized controlled trial (RCT) will evaluate the cost-effectiveness of combining extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) with standard rehabilitation versus standard rehabilitation alone for the management of hypertrophic post-burn scars in adults. The study will assess clinical outcomes-such as pain intensity, pruritus, and scar quality-alongside economic outcomes including cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained, direct medical costs, and indirect costs (e.g., absenteeism and reduced productivity). Results will inform health policy and resource allocation decisions for advanced burn rehabilitation interventions.

This randomized controlled trial is designed to evaluate the efficacy of immersive virtual reality (VR) as an adjunct to standard analgesia during dressing changes in adult burn patients. The study compares an intervention group receiving standard care combined with an immersive VR distraction (using a head-mounted display displaying an engaging virtual environment) versus a control group receiving standard care plus non-VR distraction (watching a nature video on a tablet). The primary outcomes include procedural pain intensity measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and anxiety levels measured by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Secondary outcomes include patient satisfaction and physiological parameters (heart rate and blood pressure) recorded during the procedure. This trial addresses the critical gap of heterogeneity and small sample sizes noted in previous VR studies for burn care pain management (Dascal et al., 2017).