Clinical trials

3

Search and review clinical trials. Use filters to narrow results by trial status, phase, treatment, biological sex and sponsor.

Condition / disease
Location
Status: Recruiting

Reported Experience Measurement on Reducing Patient Discomfort in Intensive Care

Hospitalisation in intensive care is always traumatic and can lead to a long rehabilitation process, slowed down by symptoms of anxiety and/or depression, and/or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). These psychiatric disorders, or post-intensive care syndrome (PICS), can persist for several years after hospitalisation in intensive care and cause functional disability. They are associated with the use of psychotropic drugs and mental health services, and impair health-related quality of life. This research is based on the hypothesis that the traumatic nature of intensive care hospitalisation can be reduced by implementing programmes to improve intensive care hospitalisation conditions, promoting changes in the practices of all healthcare professionals involved in intensive care. IPREA3 study (Kalfon et al, 2017) demonstrated that implementation of a tailor-made, multi-component programme, led by a doctor/non-medical caregiver significantly reduced the overall discomfort score (derived from the IPREA questionnaire) perceived by patients hospitalised in an intensive care unit with sufficient experience in applying this programme, having used it for at least 5 months (Kalfon et al, 2017) . The originality and interest of this research, in comparison with the IPREA3 study, lie in the following aspects: * the use of the most recent version of the IPREA questionnaire, * the questionnaire was completed by the patient themselves without the intervention of a caregiver (self-administration) * the fact that new care practices, aimed at humanising a stay in intensive care and making the experience of a stay in intensive care less traumatic, were described after the publication of the IPREA3 study a * a longer programme learning period of 9 months (compared to 5 months during the IPREA3 study) * the launch of the PREMREA programme with a conference led by a patient expert

Participants needed: 1,242
Trial details
Age: 18+Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: Almaviva SanteUpdated: Apr 13, 2026Locations: 1
Eligibility criteria

Patient, male or female, aged ≥ 18 years [+4]

Patients whose situation is incompatible with completing the IPREA questionnaire [+3]

Status: Not yet recruiting

Benefits of Ballistic Tests After the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery

During physical activities, the time available to produce a force is infinitely shorter than the time required to reach maximal muscle capacity. Previous studies have observed that the time elapsed between ground contact and ACL rupture is on average 50-60 ms, suggesting that this is the time window available for any attempt at dynamic stabilization of the joint through muscle contraction. Sports movements include ballistic movements, defined as very fast movements whose objective is to accelerate a moving mass as much as possible so that it reaches a high speed in a very short time. This is the case for vertical jumps, running and most movements performed in physical and sporting activities. Thus; (1) isokinetic tests do not allow a rigorous analysis of the components related to the speed of the movement; (2) functional tests such as jumping, which only give a distance between one leg and the other, do not allow the calculation of precise and reproducible variables concerning the force and speed of the movement, in particular during the first milliseconds of the movement, and do not provide information on compensation phenomena. It is therefore interesting to use the ballistic tests developed to monitor the movements of athletes as a new possible indicator of the return to sport. The main objective of this study is to evaluate the performance of ballistic tests in predicting failure to return to physical activity 24 months after ACL surgery.

Participants needed: 140
Trial details
Age: 18+Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: Almaviva SanteUpdated: Dec 6, 2024Locations: 1
Eligibility criteria

Adult patient (> 18 years), [+4]

Patient with high cardio-respiratory risk, [+5]

Status: Not yet recruiting

Comparison of Glue with Microparticles in Prostatic Artery Embolization

Prostatic artery embolisation (PAE) is an alternative treatment to surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). It has been practised since 2012 and numerous publications have proved not only its safety but also its efficacy. The principle of PAE is to occlude the prostatic arteries with an 'embolising agent', which will result in ischaemia and necrosis of part of the adenomatous tissue of the prostate. The reference embolisation agent is a suspension of calibrated trisacryl microparticles 300-500 microns in size. Recently, the use of glue has been retrospectively studied with acceptable efficacy and safety. In this context, where only the results of retrospective studies are available, it is necessary to initiate comparative prospective studies to assess the efficacy and safety of the glue compared with calibrated microparticles.

Participants needed: 96
Trial details
Age: 50-80Biological sex: MaleType: InterventionalSponsor: Almaviva SanteUpdated: Nov 7, 2024Locations: 1
Eligibility criteria

Male patient aged ≥ 50 years and ≤ 80 years [+2]

Patient with suspected prostate or bladder cancer on MRI [+4]