Clinical trials

12

Search and review clinical trials. Use filters to narrow results by trial status, phase, treatment, biological sex and sponsor.

Condition / disease
Location
Status: Not yet recruiting

PENG+LFCN Block vs QIPB for Total Hip Arthroplasty

This randomized clinical trial aims to evaluate and compare the analgesic efficacy and functional outcomes of the quadro-iliac plane block (QIPB) and the pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block combined with lateral femoral cutaneous nerve(LFCN) block in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. The primary outcome is the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) within the first 48 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes include postoperative total opioid consumption, ıncidence of quadriceps motor block, time to first ambulation, block performance time, falls, length of hospital stay, block- related complications(hematoma,local anesthetic systemic complications, vascular puncture, and infection), patient satisfaction assessed using a Likert scale, and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Participants needed: 60
Trial details
Age: 18-80Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: Antalya City HospitalUpdated: Jun 25, 2026
Eligibility criteria

Age between 18 and 80 years [+5]

Refusal to participate [+14]

Status: Not yet recruiting

Comparison Between Quadro-iliac Plane Block (QIPB) and Supra-Inguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block (S-FICB) for Total Hip Arthroplasty

This randomized clinical trial aims to evaluate and compare the analgesic efficacy and functional outcomes of the quadro-iliac plane block (QIPB) and the supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block (S-FICB) in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. The primary outcome is the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) within the first 48 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes include postoperative total opioid consumption, ıncidence of quadriceps motor block, time to first ambulation, block performance time, falls, length of hospital stay, block- related complications(hematoma,local anesthetic systemic complications, vascular puncture, and infection), patient satisfaction assessed using a Likert scale, and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Participants needed: 60
Trial details
Age: 18-80Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: Antalya City HospitalUpdated: Jun 24, 2026
Eligibility criteria

Age between 18 and 80 years [+5]

Refusal to participate [+14]

Status: Not yet recruiting

Intertransverse Process Block Versus M-TAPA Block After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

This randomized clinical trial aims to evaluate and compare the analgesic efficacy of the Intertransverse Process Block (ITPB) and the Modified Thoracoabdominal Nerve Block through Perichondrial Approach (M-TAPA) in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The primary outcome is the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score within the first 24 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes include total opioid consumption, requirement for rescue analgesia, block- related complications and adverse effects (hematoma, pneumothorax, local anesthetic systemic complications, vascular puncture, and infection), patient satisfaction assessed using a Likert scale, quality of recovery assessed using the QoR-15 questionnaire, and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Participants needed: 60
Trial details
Age: 18-65Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: Antalya City HospitalUpdated: Jun 16, 2026
Eligibility criteria

Patients aged 18-65 years [+5]

Refusal to participate [+8]

Status: Recruiting

Comparison of Endoscopic and Open Surgery for Gynecomastia

The goal of this observational study is to compare the clinical outcomes, safety, and patient satisfaction of endoscopic versus conventional open surgical techniques in adult male patients undergoing surgery for gynecomastia. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does endoscopic gynecomastia surgery provide better aesthetic outcomes and patient satisfaction compared with conventional open surgery? * Does endoscopic surgery reduce postoperative complications, sensory changes of the nipple-areola complex, and visible scarring compared with conventional open surgery? Researchers will compare patients undergoing endoscopic nipple-areola complex-preserving mastectomy with patients undergoing conventional open nipple-areola complex-preserving mastectomy to evaluate differences in surgical outcomes, complications, cosmetic results, and quality of life. Participants will: * Undergo gynecomastia surgery as part of their routine clinical care using either an endoscopic or conventional open technique. * Attend routine postoperative follow-up visits for up to 12 months. * Complete patient-reported outcome assessments, including pain and satisfaction questionnaires. * Undergo evaluation of scar quality, nipple-areola complex sensation, and postoperative complications during follow-up.

Participants needed: 100
Trial details
Age: 18-60Biological sex: MaleType: ObservationalSponsor: Antalya City HospitalUpdated: Jun 17, 2026Locations: 2Duration: 12 Months
Eligibility criteria

Male patients aged 18 to 60 years. [+6]

Secondary gynecomastia caused by endocrine disorders, medications, hypogonadism,... [+8]

Status: Not yet recruiting

Transversalis Fascia Plane Block Versus M-TAPA Block After Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair

This randomized clinical trial aims to evaluate and compare the analgesic efficacy of the Transversalis Fascia Plane Block (TFPB) and the Modified Thoracoabdominal Nerve Block through Perichondrial Approach (M-TAPA) in patients undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. The primary outcome is the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score within the first 24 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes include total opioid consumption, requirement for rescue analgesia, block-related complications and adverse effects (hematoma, local anesthetic systemic complications, vascular puncture, and infection), patient satisfaction assessed using a Likert scale, quality of recovery assessed using the QoR-15 questionnaire, and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Participants needed: 60
Trial details
Age: 18-65Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: Antalya City HospitalUpdated: Jun 1, 2026
Eligibility criteria

Patients aged 18-65 years [+5]

Refusal to participate [+8]

Status: Not yet recruiting

Analgesic Efficacy of Intertransverse Process Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block

This randomized clinical trial aims to evaluate and compare the analgesic efficacy of the Intertransverse Process Block (ITP) and the Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) block in patients undergoing Robotic Colorectal Surgery. The primary outcome is the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score within the first 24 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes include total opioid consumption, requirement for rescue analgesia, block-related and systemic side effects (hematoma, pneumothorax, local anesthetic systemic complications, vascular puncture, and infection), patient and surgeon satisfaction assessed using a Likert scale, and quality of recovery assessed using the QoR-15 questionnaire, and incedence of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Participants needed: 50
Trial details
Age: 18-65Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: Antalya City HospitalUpdated: May 20, 2026Locations: 1
Eligibility criteria

Patients aged 18-65 years [+5]

Refusal to participate [+8]

Status: Not yet recruiting

Intertransverse Process Block Versus M-TAPA Block After Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

This randomized clinical trial aims to evaluate and compare the analgesicefficacy of the Intertransverse Process Block (ITPB) and the Modified Thoracoabdominal Nerve Block through Perichondrial Approach (M-TAPA) in patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy. The primary outcome is the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score within the first 24 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes include total opioid consumption, requirement for rescue analgesia, block- related complications and adverse effects (hematoma, pneumothorax, local anesthetic systemic complications, vascular puncture, and infection), patient satisfaction assessed using a Likert scale, quality of recovery assessed using the QoR-15 questionnaire, and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Participants needed: 60
Trial details
Age: 18-65Biological sex: FemaleType: InterventionalSponsor: Antalya City HospitalUpdated: May 20, 2026
Eligibility criteria

Patients aged 18-65 years [+5]

Refusal to participate [+8]

Status: Not yet recruiting

Intertransverse Process Block Versus External Oblique Intercostal Plane Block After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

This randomized clinical trial aims to evaluate and compare the analgesic efficacy of the Intertransverse Process Block (ITPB) and the Subcostal External Oblique Intercostal Plane Block (EOIPB) in patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. The primary outcome is the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score within the first 24 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes include total opioid consumption, requirement for rescue analgesia, block-related complications and adverse effects (hematoma, pneumothorax, local anesthetic systemic complications, vascular puncture, and infection), patient satisfaction assessed using a Likert scale, quality of recovery assessed using the QoR-15 questionnaire, and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Participants needed: 60
Trial details
Age: 18-65Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: Antalya City HospitalUpdated: May 15, 2026
Eligibility criteria

Patients aged 18-65 years [+5]

Refusal to participate [+8]

Status: Not yet recruiting

Intertransverse Process Block Versus Subcostal Transversus Abdominis Plane Block After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

This randomized clinical trial aims to evaluate and compare the analgesic efficacy of the Intertransverse Process Block (ITPB) and the Subcostal Transversus Abdominis Plane Block (TAPB) in patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. The primary outcome is the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score within the first 24 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes include total opioid consumption, requirement for rescue analgesia, block-related complications and adverse effects (hematoma, pneumothorax, local anesthetic systemic complications, vascular puncture, and infection), patient satisfaction assessed using a Likert scale, quality of recovery assessed using the QoR-15 questionnaire, and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Participants needed: 60
Trial details
Age: 18-65Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: Antalya City HospitalUpdated: May 15, 2026Locations: 1
Eligibility criteria

Patients aged 18-65 years [+5]

Refusal to participate [+8]

Status: Not yet recruiting

Comparison of Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block and Deep Serratus Anterior Plane Block After Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery

This randomized clinical trial aims to evaluate and compare the analgesic efficacy of the Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane (SPSIP) and Deep Serratus Anterior Plane Block in patients undergoing Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery. The primary outcome is Visual Analog Scale (VAS) during the first 24 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes include total opioid consumption, requirement for rescue analgesia, block performance time, block-related and systemic side effects (hematoma, pneumothorax, local anesthetic toxicity, vascular puncture, infection), Patient satisfaction assessed using a Likert scale, Quality of recovery assessed using the QoR-15 questionnaire.

Participants needed: 60
Trial details
Age: 18-65Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: Antalya City HospitalUpdated: May 11, 2026Locations: 1
Eligibility criteria

Patients aged 18-65 years [+5]

Refusal to participate [+8]

Status: Not yet recruiting

SPSIP vs ESP Block for Analgesia After Rib Fracture Surgery

This randomized clinical trial aims to evaluate and compare the analgesic efficacy of the Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane (SPSIP) block and the Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) block in patients undergoing surgical stabilization of rib fractures. The primary outcome is the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score within the first 24 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes include total opioid consumption, requirement for rescue analgesia, block performance time, block-related and systemic side effects (hematoma, pneumothorax, local anesthetic systemic toxicity, vascular puncture, and infection), patient satisfaction assessed using a Likert scale, and quality of recovery assessed using the QoR-15 questionnaire.

Participants needed: 60
Trial details
Age: 18-65Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: Antalya City HospitalUpdated: May 11, 2026Locations: 1
Eligibility criteria

Patients aged 18-65 years [+5]

Refusal to participate [+8]

Status: Not yet recruiting

Comparison of Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block and Rhomboid Intercostal Block in Patients Undergoing Breast Cancer Surgery

This randomized clinical trial aims to evaluate and compare the analgesic efficacy of the Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane (SPSIP) and Rhomboid Intercostal Block in patients undergoing Breast Cancer Surgery With Axillary Lymph Node Dissection. The primary outcome is Visual Analog Scale (VAS) during the first 24 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes include total opioid consumption, requirement for rescue analgesia, block performance time, block-related and systemic side effects (hematoma, pneumothorax, local anesthetic toxicity, vascular puncture, infection), Patient satisfaction assessed using a Likert scale, quality of recovery assessed using the QoR-15 questionnaire.

Participants needed: 60
Trial details
Age: 18-65Biological sex: FemaleType: InterventionalSponsor: Antalya City HospitalUpdated: May 11, 2026Locations: 1
Eligibility criteria

Female patients aged 18-65 years [+5]

Refusal to participate [+8]