Clinical trials

The FUNGAL-P study is a single-center observational study designed to derive and validate a clinical prediction score for the early identification of fungal pneumonia in adult patients presenting with pneumonia. The study includes a retrospective derivation cohort and a prospective validation cohort of patients undergoing microbiological evaluation of lower respiratory tract samples. Clinical, laboratory, radiological, microbiological, and treatment-related variables associated with fungal pneumonia will be analyzed to identify independent predictors of fungal infection. These predictors will be combined to develop the FUNGAL-P score. The derived score will subsequently be evaluated in a prospective validation cohort to assess its diagnostic performance, calibration, and clinical utility. The ultimate goal is to facilitate earlier recognition of fungal pneumonia and support timely diagnostic testing and antifungal treatment in patients presenting to the Emergency Department or hospital with pneumonia.

Tuberculosis (TB) is a complex disease in which the lungs are the primary site of infection. Infection is acquired through inhalation of droplet nuclei laden with Mycobacterium bacilli (M. tuberculosis) that settle in the alveoli as the primary focus. TB is characterized by a gradual expansion of infection and cavitation that causes progressive tissue destruction. Furthermore, the increase in drug-resistant forms of TB, including multidrug resistance (MDR) and pre-extensively drug-resistant TB (XDR), is becoming increasingly concerning. Treatment of pharmacosensitive diseases involves a duration of no less than 6 months, while that of MDR-TB and XDR-TB are even longer; generally well above 24 months. Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTMs), or atypical mycobacteria, are organisms that cause various diseases such as skin and soft tissue infections, lymphadenitis, lung infections, disseminated infections, and a wide range of more rarely encountered infections that do not differ from tuberculosis in anatomy and radiologically even though they usually do not develop the primary complex. Given that the treatment success rate is unsatisfactory, there is an urgent need for new drugs and additional interventions to improve outcomes, both in patients with MDR/XDR-TB and in patients with difficult-to-treat NTM. One-way endobronchial valves (EBVs) have been used as an effective lung volume reduction strategy in emphysema without significant adverse events. The mechanism consists in inducing atelectasis, that is, creating a poorly ventilated environment with reduced oxygen tension. This reduced oxygen tension is unfavorable for the survival and proliferation of mycobacteria. Therefore, using these devices to treat cavities caused by multidrug-resistant mycobacteria or in patients not eligible for surgical therapy should reduce or completely heal the cavity, creating an inhospitable environment for the bacteria, slowing or eliminating their growth. Condition/disease: Pulmonary MDR/XDR-TB or NTM (difficult to treat or resistant to treatment) Number of patients to be enrolled: 30 It is a single-center, randomized, controlled, open-label, two-arm study.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if the AMBROSIA Bar helps prevent undernutrition and muscle loss in older adults with heart failure or atrial fibrillation. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does the AMBROSIA Bar help improve muscle mass and physical performance in older adults with heart conditions? What effects does the AMBROSIA Bar have on body composition, quality of life, inflammation, nutrition status, and gut microbiota? Researchers will compare people who assume the AMBROSIA Bar in addition to nutritional counseling to those who only receive nutritional counseling. Participants will: * Receive nutritional counseling and consume one AMBROSIA Bar per day for 6 months (intervention group) or receive nutritional counseling only (control group). * Receive clinical assessment at the moment of enrolment, after 3 months, and after 6 months * Give samples (blood, saliva, urine, and stool) and complete questionnaires to check their nutrition, cognitive, and physical health

This is a proof-of-concept phase II trial to assess the safety (as primary endpoint) and clinical efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy with Elacestrant and PULSAR. The study will enroll 21 postmenopausal patients with early HR+ HER2- node positive BC, clinically staged II-III. Patients will receive Elacestrant 345 mg orally once daily for 24 weeks and PULSAR on the MRI-based breast gross tumor volume (GTVt), consisting of 10 Gy "pulse" every 4 weeks for a maximum of 5 or less in case of radiologic complete response. Surgery will be planned 24 weeks after Elacestrant initiation and at least 2 weeks from the last pulse and will be performed as per recommended clinical practice. Patients will then receive adjuvant systemic therapy as per standard of care and postoperative RT to the locoregional lymph nodes in case of nodal residual disease, if indicated.

The primary objective of our study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a standardized clinical practice counseling strategy for promoting post-diagnosis smoking cessation among patients with SCCHN. Efficacy will be measured as the percentage of patients who succeed in sustained smoking cessation ("sustained quitters," see below) at 6+1 months after enrollment, i.e., after the initiation of anti-smoking counseling.

Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a disorder falling within the sphere of neuropathic pain, characterised by a plethora of symptoms. Regional pain out of proportion to the triggering event is the main presentation, accompanied by allodynia, dysesthesia, thermal asymmetry, trophic changes, oedema and stiffness. Recently, preliminary observational studies have found that the management of patients with CRPS, refractory to pharmacological treatment, by carpal tunnel release may be resolving; This suggests that an irritative carpal tunnel syndrome may be masked as CRPS due to non-specific symptoms and negative electrodiagnostic studies (electromyography-EMG). Classical carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a well-defined clinical condition that can be ascertained by EMG. In contrast, irritative carpal tunnel syndrome has symptoms attributable to CRPS with negative EMG that arises after trauma that required surgery or immobilisation. It is unclear how to define the presence of irritative carpal tunnel syndrome in patients diagnosed as CRPS, and thus how to make a correct diagnosis. Nor is the management of these patients defined. The aim of the research is to analyse all patients with typical symptoms for CRPS to investigate the morphological appearance of the median nerve at the level of the carpal tunnel by means of dynamic ultrasound in comparison with the healthy limb. In addition, in order to quantify the function of the median nerve, investigators will analyse patients by means of a sensory conduction velocity study (SNVC), as common EMG examinations are negative in these patients, while it is possible that the quantification of the sensory part of the nerve may be impaired. In addition, the autonomic component will be investigated by studying the Skin Sudomotor Response (SSR).The hypothesis is that some patients, after an injury that required surgery or immobilisation, develop fibrous soft tissue scarring that creates a kind of space-occupying lesion that compresses the median nerve at the level of the carpal tunnel and reduces its sliding under the transverse ligament of the carpus, a structure that is not elastic and therefore unable to adapt to the volumetric increases within it. The other hypothesis is that the fibrosis and post-traumatic oedema, which is structured, directly involves the median nerve sheath, resulting in irritation. Classical CTS develops due to mechanical trauma, high pressure and ischaemic damage affecting the median nerve and develops as a clinical condition of pure nerve suffering, with symptoms referable to a sensory and motor deficit. In CRPS, on the other hand, allodynia, hyperalgesia, sudomotor and vasomotor abnormalities and trophic changes are all symptoms that may be related, but are not specific, to nerve suffering.

The aim of the clinical investigation is to evaluate the feasibility, in terms of efficacy and safety, of a prosthetic system, the Regrasp 1 system, based on intraneural stimulation via TIME- 4H electrodes, as an aid device for restoring hand function in tetraplegic patients.

The aim of the study is to compare a customized facemask for the treatment of Class III malocclusion in the prepubertal growing patient (patients between the ages of 5 and 12 years) versus a standard commercial facemask. Specifically, preference, pain, difficulty in sleeping, time of use, and possible complications for the two types of facemasks will be analyzed. This is a single-center, national, controlled, superiority, randomized, crossover, open-label study. Each patient will be treated with both the customized facemask and the standard commercial facemask. Each patient will wear one type of facemask for 2 months and the other type of facemask for the next 2 months. After 2 weeks and at the end of therapy with each of the facemask types, the patient, with the possible help of the parents, will have to answer a questionnaire about pain and difficulty sleeping and report any complications. In addition, after completing both phases (fourth month), the patient should indicate a preference for one of the two types of mask with which to complete therapy for an additional 6 months.

The devices compared in this study are 'retainers', i.e. fixed orthodontic retainers applied to the lingual surface of the central and lateral incisors and lower canines bilaterally. Their function is to maintain dental alignment once fixed orthodontic therapy has ended. In particular, the CAD/CAM device Keeppy patented by the company Leone SpA (Via Ponte a Quaracchi 50, Sesto Fiorentino, Florence) will be compared with the standard retainer made from a steel braided wire (Ortho FlexTech, Reliance Orthodontic Products Inc., 1540 West Thorndale Ave, Itasca, Illinois, USA). This is a single-center, national, controlled, superiority, randomized, crossover, open-label study. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether the CAD/CAM retainer results in fewer failures (fractures or detachments) over a period of 6 months and 2 years compared to the standard retainer. In addition, the aim of the study is to evaluate whether the Keeppy device results in the maintenance of better periodontal health as judged by the use of plaque and bleeding indices on the surfaces of the lower six anterior teeth compared to the standard retainer. Other objectives consist of the patient's assessment of pain, difficulty in speaking and esthetic satisfaction and the stability of the lower anterior tooth sector.

Prospective Observational Study (on Diagnostic Procedure) - Single-Center, Non-Profit. A pilot study will be conducted on a prospective cohort of patients with HCAP (Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia). This study will be conducted on a single arm of patients. No control group or randomization is planned. The use of syndromic molecular panels in pneumonias with risk factors for MDR (multidrug-resistant) pathogens, such as in patients with HCAP, has become common practice. However, the use of this tool is reserved for patients with severe forms of HCAP (PIRO\>2, at least moderate ARDS, and respiratory failure requiring high-flow oxygen during sepsis) (30), and it is not yet standardized by international guidelines. The decision to use this tool or not is currently at the clinician\'s discretion and is usually reserved for the severe forms mentioned above. The study aims to determine if the early use of this tool has a real benefit on the management of antibiotic therapy for these patients in terms of therapeutic changes compared to corporate and international guidelines. Duration of patient enrollment: 1 year. Duration of the study: 1.5 years.

Non-Profit Prospective Observational Pilot Study The study will have an overall duration of 3 years, with patient enrollment starting after ethical committee approval. In this study, all patients with a diagnosis of aspiration pneumonia who require aspiration of secretions or ingesta in the Emergency Department will be considered. A registry will be created with the patients\' data, noting the type of procedure performed: laryngotracheal aspiration with a probe or with fibrobronchoscopy. This observational registry pilot study aims to evaluate the utility and adverse events related to the use of aspiration via videobronchoscopy performed in the Emergency Department and to compare the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing bronchoscopy with those treated only with blind laryngotracheal aspiration using a probe.

The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the impact of primary air pollutants and weather parameters on emergency department (ED) visits in the metropolitan area of Florence.

Intervention prospective monocentric one arm study on the use of neoadjuvant radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost (Simultaneous Integrated Boost, SIB) in patients with STS with indication for preoperative radiotherapy. The treatment will be administered in 25 daily fractions (Monday-Friday) at the disease site to include the region of suspected micrometastatic spread (Clinical Target Volume 1, CTV1) at a dose of 50 Gy (2Gy / fraction) with SIB intensification on volume reduced corresponding to the interface sites between the tumor and the vascular / nerve axes (Clinical Target Volume 2, CTV2) at a dose of 60 Gy (2.4 Gy / fraction). The association with neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on anthracyclines is allowed.

Partial nephrectomy (PN) is the standard treatment for localized renal masses and should be preferred in clinical T1 (\<7 cm tumor diameter) renal tumors over radical nephrectomy (RN) whenever technically feasible. Nonetheless, indications, approaches, techniques for PN, and correct reporting of outcomes, are still a matter of great debate within the urology community. Concurrently, case-report series suggested that alternative strategies for the treatment of localized renal tumors (ablation techniques (AT), watchful waiting (WW), active surveillance (AS)) could be feasible with acceptable oncologic outcomes in particular settings of patients with localized renal tumors. In this complex clinical scenario, the role surgeon-related and environmental factors (such as surgical experience, hospital resources, countries' social background and performance of health system) are important to address the best personalized approach in patients with renal tumors. In the light of current evidence, many unsolved questions still remain and many unmet needs must be addressed. In particular, 1) the risk-benefit trade-offs between PN and RN for anatomically complex renal localized tumors; 2) the definition of evidence-based strategies to tailor the management strategy (AT vs WW vs AS vs surgery) in different subset of patients with particular clinical conditions (i.e. old, frail, comorbid patients); and 3) the definition of evidence-based recommendations to adapt surgical approach (open vs laparoscopic vs robotic) and resection techniques to different patient-, tumor-, and surgeon-specific characteristics. To meet the challenges, to overcome the limitations of current kidney cancer literature (such as the retrospective study design, potential risk of biases, and heterogeneous follow-up of most series), and to provide high-quality evidence for future development of effective clinical practice Guidelines, we designed the international REgistry of COnservative or Radical treatment of localized kiDney tumors (i-RECORD) Project. The expected impact of the i-RECORD project is to provide robust evidence on the leading clinical and environmental factors driving selection of the management strategy in patients with kidney cancer, and the differential impact of different management strategies (including AS, WW, AT, PN and RN) on functional, perioperative and oncological outcomes, as well as quality of life assessment, at a mid-long term follow-up (5-10 years).

This observational study was designed to evaluate progression free survival after PSMA-PET/CT based salvage approach for patients affected by biochemical relapse after radical prostatectomy.