Clinical trials

This clinical trial aims to assess the safety and efficacy of microwave ablation in treating vascular malformations, including both venous malformations (VM) and arteriovenous malformations (AVM). Vascular malformations are abnormal clusters of blood vessels that can cause pain, swelling, and functional impairment, significantly affecting a patient's quality of life. Microwave ablation is a minimally invasive treatment that uses heat to shrink abnormal vessels, but its effectiveness and safety for these conditions need further investigation. The trial will enroll 150 patients (100 with venous malformations and 50 with arteriovenous malformations), all of whom will undergo a single session of microwave ablation. Ultrasound guidance will be used during the procedure to precisely target the lesions, while MRI will be used for both preoperative and postoperative evaluations to assess lesion size and track changes over time. The primary goals of the study are to determine whether microwave ablation can reduce lesion size and improve symptoms such as pain and swelling. Additionally, the study will monitor adverse events to evaluate the safety of the procedure, including any potential complications like infection, bleeding, or nerve injury. Patients will be followed for 12 months, with MRI scans taken at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after the procedure to evaluate lesion shrinkage and monitor for any recurrence. Clinical symptoms will also be assessed at these time points to track improvement. This study could provide important data on the safety and efficacy of microwave ablation, potentially offering a less invasive treatment option for patients with vascular malformations.

Lower extremity varicose veins (LEVV) are common among elderly patients and can cause leg heaviness, pain, and swelling. In some older adults, venous congestion may contribute to knee or peri-knee pain, which is often misattributed to degenerative joint disease alone. Evidence on whether varicose vein treatment can relieve knee pain in very elderly patients (aged 80 years or older) is limited. This prospective cohort study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of endovenous ablation (EVA) for improving knee pain in elderly patients with symptomatic varicose veins. The study will include participants aged 80 years or older who present with both lower extremity varicose veins and knee joint pain. Eligible patients will undergo endovenous thermal ablation (radiofrequency or endovenous laser ablation) as the primary intervention. Participants will be assessed at baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after treatment. The primary outcome is the change in knee pain intensity measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) from baseline to 6 months. Secondary outcomes include changes in knee joint function (assessed by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index \[WOMAC\] or Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score \[KOOS\]), venous clinical severity score (VCSS), limb heaviness, quality of life (assessed by EQ-5D), and procedure-related complications. Safety will be evaluated by recording peri-procedural adverse events, including deep vein thrombosis, skin burns, nerve injury, and postoperative infection. The study will also analyze whether preexisting osteoarthritis, venous reflux severity, or body mass index (BMI) affect the magnitude of pain improvement. The hypothesis is that endovenous ablation improves knee pain in elderly patients by reducing venous congestion around the knee and improving venous return. This study will help clarify whether treating varicose veins can provide additional benefits for knee pain and mobility in patients aged 80 years and older.

The prevalence of severe chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) is significant in the growing octogenarian population. While radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a standard minimally invasive treatment, robust data on its outcomes and safety profiles specifically in patients aged 80 years and older remain scarce. This study aims to evaluate the risks and benefits of RFA in this specific, high-risk demographic.This prospective, single-arm, single-center cohort study will enroll 50 patients (initial target sample size) aged ≥80 years with CVI classified as CEAP C3 to C6 and with confirmed great or small saphenous vein reflux. All participants will undergo endovenous RFA under tumescent local anesthesia. The primary outcomes are: 1) the great/small saphenous vein occlusion rate at 6 months, assessed by duplex ultrasonography, and 2) the change in disease-specific quality of life from baseline to 6 months, measured by the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ). Secondary outcomes include occlusion rates at 1 and 3 months; complication rates (e.g., deep vein thrombosis, skin burns, paresthesia) within 30 days; and changes in the Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) and the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) at predefined intervals over 6 months.This study is designed to demonstrate a high technical success rate (occlusion rate \>95% at 6 months) and a statistically significant improvement in AVVQ and VCSS scores at 6 months post-procedure. The collected data will provide a detailed profile of complication rates, characterizing the safety of RFA in this very elderly cohort.This study will provide crucial, prospective evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of RFA for treating CVI in octogenarians. The findings are expected to guide clinical decision-making and inform treatment guidelines for this vulnerable and expanding patient population.

This observational study aims to assess the effect of oral antiplatelet or anticoagulant drugs on key postoperative outcomes in patients with lower extremity varicose veins who have undergone radiofrequency ablation. Its main objectives are to determine the impact of these medications on postoperative 30-day bleeding risk and postoperative 3-month venous closure rate in this patient population. Researchers will compare three groups-patients receiving oral antiplatelet drugs, those receiving oral anticoagulant drugs, and those not receiving either type of drug-to identify differences in the two key outcomes. Participants will complete baseline data collection (including medical history, medication use, and lower extremity venous assessment) before or shortly after radiofrequency ablation, undergo 30-day postoperative follow-up to evaluate bleeding events (such as minor bleeding or major bleeding requiring medical intervention), receive venous ultrasound at 3 months postoperatively to measure venous closure rate, and report any medication changes or adverse events during the follow-up period.

This study will observe patients with lower limb varicose veins who also have knee pain. Many patients with varicose veins experience swelling, heaviness, or aching in the legs, and some also report pain in or around the knee. Previous studies suggest that venous reflux and poor circulation may increase discomfort in the knee, especially when knee osteoarthritis is present. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether treatment of varicose veins with standard endovenous procedures can improve knee pain and function. Participants will undergo standard vein treatment as part of their clinical care. We will follow them for changes in knee pain, quality of life, and leg symptoms over time. This study does not assign patients to experimental interventions. Instead, it collects information before and after treatment to better understand the relationship between varicose veins and knee pain relief. Findings from this study may help doctors identify which patients are most likely to benefit from venous treatment in terms of both leg and knee symptoms.

This study aims to systematically compare the clinical efficacy (venous closure rate and symptom relief rate), safety (perioperative and postoperative complications), and cost-effectiveness (direct medical costs) of domestic Xianruida radiofrequency catheter and imported Medtronic catheter in endovenous radiofrequency ablation for varicose veins through a single-center, prospective, non-inferiority randomized controlled trial.

This study is a multicenter, prospective, observational research project. It is anticipated to enroll a total of 6,000 patients between February 1, 2025, and January 31, 2028 (with completion of one-year postoperative follow-up by January 31, 2029). Patients will be grouped according to different combinations of anticoagulant and antiplatelet drugs used postoperatively for PAD. The types, dosages, and duration of postoperative anticoagulant and antiplatelet drug use will be recorded. Follow-up assessments will be conducted at 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively to document the occurrence of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) and Major Adverse Limb Events (MALE) in the enrolled patients.

Objective: To investigate the clinical efficacy of ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation and microwave ablation in the treatment of primary saphenous varicose veins.

Objective: This study is a single-center prospective observational research that recorded patients' pain scores at four time points during surgery (puncture and catheter insertion, swelling fluid injection, microwave generator operation, and end of surgery). It analyzed the correlation between pain during microwave ablation treatment for great saphenous vein varicosities and factors such as age, gender, body mass index, volume of swelling fluid used, and others, in order to summarize and improve surgical details to reduce patients' intraoperative pain.