Clinical trials

This phase II study evaluates whether early treatment with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) plus prednisone improves liver inflammation caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors. The study includes patients who develop moderate to severe immune-related hepatitis after receiving PD-(L)1 or CTLA-4-based cancer therapy. The main goal is to determine how many patients experience improvement in liver function within 30 days while successfully tapering steroids. Safety and treatment-related side effects will also be monitored.

The goal of this clinical study is to learn whether a prehabilitation program can improve recovery after major abdominal surgery in adults with cancer who are receiving treatment before surgery. Prehabilitation is supportive care given before surgery to help patients prepare physically, nutritionally, and emotionally. The main questions this study aims to answer are: 1. Does prehabilitation reduce the number of participants who die or have serious complications within 30 days after surgery? 2. Does prehabilitation improve physical strength and fitness, nutritional status, emotional well-being, and quality of life before surgery? 3. Does prehabilitation affect the length of the hospital stay after surgery, the time it takes to start additional cancer treatment after surgery, or the ability to complete recommended additional treatment? Participants will take part in a prehabilitation program during their treatment period before surgery. The program includes visits with physical therapy, nutrition, and health psychology. Participants will meet with each specialty at least twice before surgery. They will also complete questionnaires and tests that measure physical function, diet and weight, emotional well-being, and quality of life. After surgery, information about recovery and additional cancer treatment will be collected from medical records for up to 120 days. Researchers will compare the outcomes of participants who receive the prehabilitation program with outcomes from similar patients who previously received care at Fox Chase Cancer Center but did not participate in this study.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if an educational video and workbook can help gynecologic cancer patients talk to their cancer providers about sexual health concerns. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Do gynecologic cancer patients who take part in the educational program and get a resource booklet talk to their cancer clinicians more about sexual health concerns than patients who get a resource booklet alone? 2. Do gynecologic cancer patients who take part in the educational program and get a resource booklet have better sexual function and less anxiety and depression than patients who get a resource booklet alone? Researchers will compare those who get the educational program and the resource booklet to those who get the resource booklet alone along with their usual care. Participants will: 1. Fill out a consent form and survey 2. Have their next clinic visit audio recorded 3. Fill out another survey right after their clinic visit 4. Fill out a final survey 6 months after their clinic visit

This is an open-label, single institution study evaluating the efficacy of intravenous iron sucrose monotherapy in patients with thoracic, breast, GU and GI malignancies undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy with the goal of undergoing surgical resection.

This is a prospective, phase II, stratified single arm investigation for favorable prognosis in p16+ oropharynx cancer patients with either node negative or malignant neck adenopathy with lymphoscintigraphy mapping confined to the ipsilateral neck.

This is an open-label, non-randomized, single-center, phase II study to evaluate the efficacy, toxicity and, tolerability of pre-specified dose attenuated chemotherapy regimens in lung cancer patients with comorbidities.

Phase I, open label, dose-escalation, and safety study designed to assess the safety and biologic activity of the investigational agent CBL0137 in combination with standard of care drugs, ipilimumab and nivolumab in sequential cohorts of adult patients with locally advanced and metastatic melanoma who are candidates for immune checkpoint blockade and have tumors accessible for serial biopsies.

This is a multi-site, three-cohort phase II trial of cabozantinib for IMDC all-risk frontline metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients OR any line mRCC patients who have not previously been treated with cabozantinib, and patients with pancreatic or extra-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if drug CADI-05, when used together with pembrolizumab (an FDA approved immunotherapy), can help treat locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC) in adults. It will also learn about the safety of drug CADI-05. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does using CADI-05 together with pembrolizumab help the immune system fight cancer better and lead to better results for patients? * What side effects or health problems might happen when people receive these two treatments? Participants will: * Get pembrolizumab by IV (through a vein) once on day 1 of week 1 and again day 1 of week 4. This is standard of care treatment. * Get CADI-05 as a small injection into the skin once a week for 5 weeks. This is the experimental (research) treatment. * Visit the clinic every week for treatments, checkups and tests for 5 weeks. * Have surgery between week 6 and week 7. * Return to the clinic once for a follow-up visit about 30 days after surgery.

This is a single-arm, open-label, non-randomized Phase II trial evaluating the efficacy of induction therapy with enfortumab vedotin (EV) plus pembrolizumab (P) for 18 weeks (6 cycles), followed by maintenance pembrolizumab in treatment-naïve patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). Approximately 97 patients will be enrolled. Induction consists of EV (1.25 mg/kg IV on Days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle; starting dose of 1 mg/kg allowed) and P (200 mg IV on Day 1 of each cycle). Radiographic assessments occur after 3 and 6 cycles. Patients achieving complete or partial response transition to maintenance P (400 mg IV every 6 weeks or 200 mg IV every 3 weeks) for up to 2 years. Dose modifications for EV are permitted per protocol; no dose adjustments for P. Treatment continues until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or completion of maintenance therapy. Patients will enter long-term or survival follow-up as applicable.

The overarching goal of the current study is to reduce the burden Asian American patients may feel are on their caregivers by designing and testing the feasibility and efficacy of a positive activity intervention designed to increase a sense of autonomy, competence, and connectedness, each of which have been shown to be associated with psychological benefits according to self-determination theory.

The goal of this clinical trial is to find out if giving extra adaptive radiation therapy after standard chemoradiation treatment is safe and helpful for people with rectal cancer. The main questions the study aims to answer are: * Can this approach help target the most aggressive cancer cells more accurately, while protecting nearby healthy tissue? * Can it reduce the side effects that people may experience during treatment? Participants will: * First receive standard treatment: radiation (45 Gy in 25 sessions) along with a chemotherapy pill called capecitabine. * Then get extra radiation using MRI scans every two weeks to adjust the treatment based on how the tumor responds. * Use a small balloon during treatment to help aim the radiation and protect healthy areas. * Finally, receive additional chemotherapy (such as FOLFOX) for four months.

This trial aims at investigating the diagnostic ability of a combined diagnostic panel including systematic endoscopic evaluation (SEE), blood-based ctDNA assay, and urine-based cfDNA assay to predict the presence of residual tumor remaining in the bladder at cystectomy. Patients who are planned for cystectomy due to bladder cancer will be considered for enrollment based on inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Single arm Phase I trial of adaptive stereotactic body radiation (SBRT) for abdominopelvic metastases. Adaptive SBRT will allow for escalation of the prescription dose and target coverage while maintaining grade 3+ toxicity no greater than 10%. Subjects with metastatic cancer to the abdomen or pelvis requiring local control or palliation will be enrolled.

This is Phase 1 dose finding trial with potential dose expansion to evaluate the safety, toxicity, recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of Neratinib plus TDxD using a standard 3+3 dose escalation design in patients with metastatic or unresectable gastro-esophageal cancer that are HER2-overexpressing (IHC 3+ or IHC2+/ISH+) and any other gastrointestinal cancer with HER2 expression with IHC3+. Patients must have progressed or been intolerant of at least one prior line of chemotherapy + HER2 directed therapy.

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate if adaptive stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a safe and effective way to treat prostate cancer in adults. It will assess the safety profile of adaptive SBRT over time. The main questions this trial aims to answer are: * What is highest dose of adaptive SBRT without causing serious side effects? * Can adaptive SBRT more precisely targeting the prostate while reducing radiation exposure to nearby organs? * What side effects do participants experience during treatment, right after treatment, and over the five years post-treatment? * Can adaptive SBRT reduce urination-related side effects and support quality of life during and after treatment? Participants will: * Receive adaptive SBRT treatment every other day, for a total of 5 treatment sessions (called fractions). The full course of treatment typically takes 2 to 3 weeks. * Have a follow-up phone call about 6 weeks after treatment to check on side effects and overall wellbeing. * Visit the clinic for check-ups and tests: * At 90 days (about 3 months) after treatment * Then every 3 months for the first year * Then every 6 months after that

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if Adaptive Radiation Therapy (ART) is safe and effective in treating patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. The main questions the study aims to answer are: * Can ART improve how well radiation therapy targets the most aggressive cancer cells, while protecting the healthy tissue around the tumor? * Can ART help reduce the side effects that participants may experience during treatment? Participants will: * Undergo CT scans to plan the exact location of the radiation treatment. During this process, 1-3 small markers may be placed in or near the tumor to help with the planning. * Have a tumor biopsy, which involves taking a small sample of tissue from the cancer. * Receive 5 radiation treatments every other day over a 2-week period. * Provide blood samples before, during, and after your radiation treatment.

This is a pilot, prospective, randomized study evaluating the feasibility and acceptability of incorporating hemp-derived cannabidiol (CBD) supplementation to prevent oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy (OIPN) in patients receiving oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy for colorectal cancer (CRC). Participants will be randomized to receive either CBD capsules in addition to standard therapy or standard therapy alone.

The goal of this study is to develop a comprehensive characterization of genetic and molecular drivers of breast and prostate cancer in individuals of African ancestry. The study is conducted by the African Caribbean Cancer Consortium (AC3) and involves the recruitment of patients from nine international AC3 research sites in the Bahamas, Barbados, Benin, Burkina Faso, Haiti, Jamaica, Kenya, Namibia, and Trinidad and Tobago, and the US. The main questions are to: molecularly characterize genomic changes in the African Cancer genomes of the breast and prostate and identify the effects of social determinants of health and lifestyle factors on mutational landscape. Black individuals that have been diagnosed with pathologically confirmed prostate or breast cancer will be included. Detailed social determinants of health survey, blood and archived FFPE tissues will be collected. (Tier 1) All patient tissues will be subject to IHC for receptor status (ER, AR, PR Her2/neu). All patients with available germline DNA from blood will receive genetic screening using a Commercial gene panel testing. (Tier 2) Patient samples with a negative genetic screening will be subject to whole exome sequencing or banked for later RNA or methylation sequencing.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a chemotherapy combination called gemcitabine and carboplatin (GC) works to treat advanced urothelial cancer in people who have already been treated with enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab (EVP). It will also learn about the efficacy and safety of GC in these patients. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does GC shrink the cancer or stop it from growing? * What medical side effects do participants have while receiving GC? Researchers will study how GC affects survival, cancer control, and quality of life. They will also collect blood samples to look at health-related markers and cancer DNA in the blood. \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Participants will: * Receive the GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine and cisplatin) after having been treated with EVP * Visit the clinic regularly for checkups, lab tests, and scans * Answer questions about their health, quality of life, and daily function * Provide blood samples for research This study may help researchers find better ways to treat advanced bladder and urinary tract cancer in the future-especially for older adults or those who have already tried other treatments.

This is a randomized trial of intensified post-discharge surveillance (Intervention Arm) versus standard post-discharge surveillance (Control Arm).

This is a randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the efficacy of an electronic health decision support tool called Gene PilotLX to increase informed decision making regarding hereditary risk information from tumor genomic profiling (TGP) test among Latinx cancer patients recruited at four cancer centers.

This is a first-in-human, phase I, open-label, non-randomized dose-escalation and dose-expansion study with the primary objective to determine the safety profile of small molecule, mitochondrial-targeted Hsp90 inhibitor, gamitrinib, including identification of dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in patients with advanced cancers. A secondary objective of the study is to determine the recommended dose and regimen(s) for a phase II study. This study is based on preclinical data demonstrating the anticancer activity, unique mechanism of action and preliminary safety of gamitrinib. In the dose-finding portion of this study, gamitrinib formulated in Lipoid S100®-based formulation will be administered as a 1-hour IV infusion once weekly for four weeks as 28-day treatment cycles. Up to 36 patients will be enrolled in the dose-escalation component of the study based on anticipated cohorts. The starting dose will be 10 mg, corresponding to allometric scaling) from the most sensitive species (rats) in the 29-day GLP toxicology and toxicokinetic studies with 14-day recovery period of gamitrinib. Dose-escalation will follow a 3+3 design. Six patients will be enrolled in the dose-expansion component of the study at MTD for the purpose of exploring pharmacodynamic effects via tumor pre and on-therapy biopsies.

The investigators hypothesize that Scrambler therapy with duloxetine, compared to duloxetine-based usual care, will result in greater improvement in CIPN as measured by the BPI-Short Form. In addition, the investigators will further assess pain using the EORTC CIPN-20 and determine whether Scrambler therapy results in improved levels of function as measured with the PDQ, and a decreased need for opioid medications. Our primary objective is to investigate whether Scrambler therapy with duloxetine is superior to duloxetine-based usual care in achieving at least a 50% reduction in pain scores, when comparing the cross-sectionally measured "average" pain score at day 35 to the cross-sectionally measured "average" pain score at baseline.

This Interventional clinical study aims to explore how receiving information about their health and physical abilities affects the treatment decisions of older adults. The study will look at whether sharing detailed assessments of their health and functional status helps older adults better understand their condition and make informed decisions about their care. The main question it aims to answer is if providing this information changes the treatment priorities of older adults, helping them focus on what matters most to them in their medical care.