Clinical trials

Selution Iberia registry is a post-market clinical follow-up, prospective, multicenter, international, longitudinal, observational study without a control group of consecutive unselected "real-world" patients with coronary artery disease in whom it was decided to use the SELUTION SLRTM device in the treatment of primary native lesions and ISR (in-stent restenosis) in all settings, in order to evaluate its effectiveness and safety. The primary objective is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the Sirolimus-eluting balloon SELUTION SLRTM based strategy in the treatment of native coronary artery stenosis and in-stent restenosis. The primary endpoint will be the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events at 12 months, including death, non-fatal myocardial infarction or target lesion revascularization for ischemia, in an unselected "real-world" patient setting. Both Device Oriented Composite Endpoint (Cardiovascular death, device failure-related myocardial infarction or device failure-related ischaemia) and Patient Oriented Composite Endpoint (all cause death, any stroke, any myocardial infarction or any revascularization) will be detailed.

Post-market, prospective, observational, multicenter, non-intervention study, to demonstrate the effectiveness of drug-coated ballon (DCB)therapy in real-world patients with small native vessel coronary artery disease, and to demonstrate the safety of short dual antiplatelet therapy (7 days) in high-bleeding risk patients with native small vessel coronary artery disease treated with DCB therapy. A percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with DCB will be performed in patients with native vessel coronary artery disease based on the criterion of the treating physician.

To evaluate the efficacy of the two DES (Drug Eluting Stent) used in terms of device-related adverse events at 12 months after PCI (Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). To compare the clinical safety and efficacy by comparing net clinical events (defined as the combination of ischemic and hemorrhagic events) of the two DES used at 12 months after PCI.

The study is designed as a prospective, multi-center, observational PMCF (post-market clinical follow-up) study of the Ultimaster Nagomi™ \_stent (lengths of 38, 44 and 50 mm) in the treatment of coronary artery disease according to the indications approved in the CE marking.

International, investigator-driven, multicenter, open-label, prospective randomized controlled trial where patients with de novo lesions due to calcified nodules (CN) were randomized to drug eluting balloon (DEB) or drug eluting stents (DES).

Patients receiving chronic oral anticoagulation with indication for percutaneous coronary revascularization with stent implantation, and needing for antiplatelet therapy, are at high risk of bleeding. The new generation of ultrathin strut sirolimus-eluting stent with bioabsorbable polymer allow for shorter antiplatelets regimens and could be a good option for this high-bleeding risk patients.

The VIVALL-2 study is a randomized trial to compare the self-expandable supra-annular Allegra and the balloon-expandable intra-annular Edwards transcatheter valve systems in patients with degenerated biological aortic surgical valve.

Clinical research with medical devices indicated in accordance with the CE marking, led by researchers, multicenter, open, prospective, randomized and controlled. Patients are randomized to treatment with a conventional balloon and then a coronary stent or to initial plaque modification with Orbital Atherectomy (OA) and then a coronary stent. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of OA in the adequate treatment with coronary stent of the calcified bifurcation lesion using angiography and optical coherence tomography (OCT).

International, Multicenter, prospective, non-randomized, post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) study to confirm and support the clinical safety and performance of Coroflex® ISAR NEO coronary stent system to meet EU Medical Device regulation (MDR) requirements in all the CONSECUTIVE patients treated with Coroflex® ISAR NEO coronary stent system sirolimus eluting stent.

This study is designed to evaluate the success rate of transfemoral implantation of the Hydra THV biological aortic valve prosthesis in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. The device is used in accordance with its Instructions for Use as a CE-marked transcatheter heart valve system. The study will assess procedural success, device performance, and early clinical outcomes following implantation. Patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) via the transfemoral approach will be followed to evaluate safety and effectiveness outcomes, including short- and mid-term clinical follow-up.

Multicenter, prospective, non-randomized, post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) study to confirm and support the clinical safety and performance of Sequent Please Neo to meet EU Medical Device regulation (MDR) requirements in all the consecutive patients treated with Sequent Please Neo.

Randomized, controlled, open and multicenter study that analyzes the vasomotor function 8 months after use of the drug-eluting balloon (DCB) vs. drug-eluting stent (DES) in vessels ≥ 3.5 mm

Single center, prospective, non-randomized, post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) study to confirm and support the clinical safety and performance of Essential Pro to meet EU Medical Device regulation (MDR) requirements in all the CONSECUTIVE patients treated with Essential Pro.

the use of pressure wires is the standar of care to evaluate angiographically intermediate coronary lesions, however, limitations in the management of these type of lesions continue to be a challenge for the interventional cardiologist. The use of FFR has some limitations such as the use of adenosine due to its cost, adverse effects (e.g. transient atrioventricular block, angina, headache, etc.), time consuming and some relative contraindications for its use. In this sense, in recent years new rest indices (iFR, RFR, dPR) and hyperemic indices without adenosine (cFFR-NTG, Pd/Pa-NTG or cFFR) have been developed, demonstrating an improvement in terms of outcomes with its use, so they can also be used as a tool to guide us to plan our strategy. These new indices, particularly the cFFR-NTG, are simpler, at least as safe and have an excellent correlation with the FFR with adenosine in the assessment of intermediate coronary lesions. In recent years, functional assessment after intervention has also been increasingly implemented, which, like intracoronary imaging, can make us change our attitude and correlate with the prognosis. The lower implementation of this practice, especially in multivessel patients, may result from having to lose the position of the wire to check equalization, difficulty in crossing the wire, wear/breakage of the material after diagnosis (2-3 vessels), use more time and contrast, etc. These problems could be reduced, at least partially, with the use of the workhorse coronary guidewire pressure microcatheter to measure post-PCI functional assessment. Although the usefulness of post-PCI FFR has been demonstrated, there is no clearly established cut-off value (0.84-0.96) and it seems that in reality the values are a continuum of risk so that the higher the value, the better the prognosis . Furthermore, other simpler indices such as rest or hyperemic indices without adenosine have not been correlated with FFR in post-PCI. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the correlation between cFFR-NTG and other indices taking FFR as a reference in multivessel patients after undergoing intervention. Establish cut-off points and correlate it with adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in a 1-year clinical follow-up.

The OPTIMAL randomized clinical trial has been designed to compare two imaging strategies and to test the hypothesis that a calcium modification strategy informed by coronary CT angiography (CCTA) will improve procedural efficiency and effectiveness compared with the current standard of care (IVUS-guided PCI) while achieving similar clinical outcomes in patients with hemodynamically significant calcified coronary artery disease.

The study aims to compare a preventive percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) plus optimal medical treatment (OMT) strategy vs. OMT for treatment of non-functionally significant non-culprit lesions presenting with optical coherence tomography (OCT) findings indicative of vulnerable plaque, in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel disease.

Multicenter, prospective, non-randomized, post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) study to confirm and support the clinical safety and performance of Medical Device Regulations (MDR) with multivessel coronary disease requirements in all the CONSECUTIVE patients treated with (SUPRAFLEX CRUZ).

To assess the influence of superficial calcium on the early endothelialization (1 month) of the struts of the Xience Skypoint stent (comparing struts with underlying superficial calcium to struts without underlying calcification)

Clinical investigation with CE-marked medical devices, multicenter, prospective, randomized and controlled. Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation at high embolic risk and with at least one high bleeding risk criterion according to the Munich consensus document will be randomized to left atrial appendage closure with either the Amplatzer Amulet™ or the LAmbre™ device. The study is designed to compare the efficacy and safety of both devices regarding successful implantation, effective appendage closure, and clinical outcomes at follow-up.

Open-label, randomized, cross-over study conducted in a single center, applied to patients receiving a polypill with 100 mg of acetyl salicylic acid and different doses of ramipril and atorvastatin for indication of secondary prevention according to clinical practice, with objective of analyzing the level of systolic blood pressure and LDL-cholesterol in the same patient in 2 different periods: one under treatment of 3 months with the polypill and another of 3 months with the components separately.

Several studies have demonstrated that simultaneous treatment with two stentrievers (STs) as rescue treatment is very effective, with high recanalization rates even in this group of patients where other revascularization techniques have failed. There has been no observed increase in hemorrhagic complications. Recently, a prospective study has been published where treatment with two ST has been shown to be effective and safe if used as a first-choice treatment (not as rescue) with a successful recanalization rate (eTICI 2c/3) after the first pass of 69%. These results have been reinforced after the publication of a randomized study that confirms, in vitro, the superiority of using two ST over one.

Brief Summary: A prospective, multicenter, single-arm, non-randomized study including consecutive patients with nonvalvular AF(Atrial Fibrillation), with a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥2 (men) or ≥3 (women), and contraindication for long-term anticoagulant treatment, with successful LAAC (Left Atrial Appendage Closure)procedure with the LAmbre device, who at discharge are eligible for short-term (3-months-only) SAPT. We want to assess if a short-term single antiplatelet therapeutic regime of Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) 100 mg (or clopidogrel 75 mg if ASA contraindication), once daily, for 3 months is safe and effective at 12 months follow-up.