Clinical trials

Objectives: To compare the response of polycythemia in terms of hematocrit decrease in patients treated with positive airway pressure (CPAP) versus patients not treated with CPAP. Methodology: Randomized, parallel-group, nonblinded, controlled clinical trial. Patients diagnosed with OSA in a respiratory polygraphy (RP) and who meet all the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria will undergo sleepiness and quality of life questionnaires, anthropometric measurements and blood tests and will be randomized to a CPAP treatment group or control group, maintaining this treatment for 12 months. A visit will be made at 12 weeks ,24 weeks and 52 weeks to check compliance with CPAP in the treatment group and to carry out questionnaires on physical activity and quality of life, anthropometric measurements, blood tests including hemoglobin and hematocrit as well as parameters related to coagulation and platelet function and changes in medication as well as adverse effects. Efficacy variables: blood count, hemoglobin, haematocrit, erythropoietin, mean corpuscular volume (MCV), mean corpuscular haemoglobin (MCH), mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration (MCHC), mean platelet volume (MPV), platelets, coagulation, erythrocyte range of distribution (ADE), glucose, creatinine, glomerular filtration rate, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), gamma glutamyltransferase (GGT), Total bilirubin, hypoxic burden, Epworth score, EuroQol- 5D questionnaire.

Introduction Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common disorder in obese patients, especially those undergoing bariatric surgery. OSA is characterized by upper airway obstruction during sleep, leading to intermittent hypoxia and sleep fragmentation. Obesity and OSA are closely related conditions that can exacerbate each other. Positive airway pressure therapy is essential for managing OSA, but adherence to therapy can be challenging, particularly in patients who experience rapid physiological changes after bariatric surgery. Objective This study aims to determine whether automatic positive airway pressure therapy (APAP) improves nightly usage hours compared to continuous positive airway pressure therapy (CPAP) in obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Secondary objectives include evaluating the percentage of nights with therapy use over 4 hours, reduction of the residual apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), changes in daytime sleepiness, pressure requirements, side effects, sleep-related quality of life, reduction in in-person visits, and optimization of healthcare resources. Methodology A randomized, parallel-group, open-label, controlled clinical trial will be conducted. Adult patients eligible for bariatric surgery with a diagnosis of moderate to severe OSA (AHI \> 15) requiring positive pressure therapy will be included. Participants will be randomized to receive either APAP or CPAP. Follow-up will be conducted over 12 months after surgery, with assessments at 3, 6, and 12 months. Data will be collected on treatment adherence, residual AHI, OSA symptoms, daytime sleepiness, quality of life, and treatment costs. APAP therapy is expected to improve nightly usage hours compared to CPAP. It is also expected that APAP will show better adaptation to changing pressure needs after bariatric surgery. Data will be analyzed to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-efficiency of both therapies. This study will provide evidence on the efficacy of APAP compared to CPAP in obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery. The results will help optimize the treatment of OSA in this population and improve patients' quality of life. Additionally, the study is expected to contribute to the optimization of healthcare resources by reducing in-person visits and repeated sleep studies.