Clinical trials

Macroscopic haematuria is a common urological emergency. Diagnostic cystoscopy is the gold standard for identifying the bleeding source; however, blood and clots within the bladder significantly impair endoscopic visibility when saline is used as the distension medium. Air-based cystoscopy, a technique first described in the 19th century, exploits the immiscibility of gas and blood to maintain clear visualisation even during active bleeding. Despite its theoretical advantages, no randomised clinical data exist to support its use. AIROSCOPY is a prospective, randomised, controlled, single-centre superiority study comparing air-based versus saline-based flexible cystoscopy in patients with macroscopic haematuria (Grade III-V). Patients are randomised 1:1. Only the index cystoscopy (first randomised modality) contributes to all study endpoints. A second cystoscopy with the alternative modality is performed solely for patient safety to ensure no diagnostic disadvantage from study participation. This second examination is not analysed. The primary endpoint is identification of the bleeding source during the index cystoscopy (binary: yes/no). Secondary endpoints include time to source identification, total procedure duration, urologist-rated visibility (Likert scale), and patient comfort (Likert scale).

This study compares two ways of closing the uterus during cesarean delivery. In one group, the decidual layer near the uterine cavity is included in the suture. In the other group, this layer is left out. The study will examine whether these two methods differ in how well the uterine scar heals 6 to 9 months after surgery. Women having an elective cesarean delivery will be randomly assigned to one of the two closure methods. Scar healing will be assessed by ultrasound after delivery. The goal is to determine whether one method is associated with better cesarean scar healing and fewer scar defects.

This study compares Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) training in two hospitals, one that uses an online application for supervision and one that does not use the application. The goal of this trial is to learn if POCUS supervision using the online application is associated with improved POCUS skills in residents in General Internal Medicine (GIM). The main question it aims to answer is: \- Do POCUS skills improve more during 6 months in GIM residents supervised using the application than in GIM residents who do not use the application? Further questions the study aims to answer are: * Do residents using the application perform more POCUS exams during 6 months than residents not using the application? * Are residents using the application more satisfied with their POCUS training than residents not using the application?