Clinical trials

4

Search and review clinical trials. Use filters to narrow results by trial status, phase, treatment, biological sex and sponsor.

Condition / disease
Location
Status: Recruiting

Construction and Clinical Validation Study of a Prediction Model for Depression After Ischemic Stroke

Post-stroke depression (PSD) is the most common neuropsychiatric disorder after a stroke, with an incidence rate of 20% to 60%. PSD is not only associated with higher mortality rates, poorer recovery, more obvious cognitive impairments, greater economic burdens, and lower quality of life, but also brings additional medical expenses and care pressure to families. Society also needs to bear higher medical costs. Currently, the early diagnosis of PSD is difficult, which may lead to poor prognosis after stroke. This study aims to utilize machine learning technology to integrate multi-dimensional indicators of patients with ischemic stroke, establish a risk prediction model for PSD, and assist in early, accurate, and individualized assessment of PSD risk in clinical practice.

Participants needed: 488
Trial details
Biological sex: AllType: ObservationalSponsor: Min SuUpdated: Feb 5, 2026Locations: 1
Eligibility criteria

Patients with acute ischemic stroke; [+2]

Confusion of consciousness,severe cognitive impairment, etc [+2]

Status: Recruiting

Subanesthetic Esketamine in Modified ECT for Severe Depression in Adolescents: Clinical and Mechanistic Study

The study design was a randomized, double blind, parallel controlled trial.The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if esketamine-assisted modified electroconvulsive therapy (ESK-MECT) works to treat severe depression in adolescents. It will also learn about the safety of ESK-MECT. The sample size was calculated based on the response rate of patients with depression undergoing electroconvulsive therapy(ECT).According to the results of the pilot study,the efficacy rate of subjects receiving adjunctive esketamine was approximately 78%,while the efficacy rate of those receiving only propofol was 63%.The expected superiority difference in remission rates between the two groups was 15%(one-sided)for the power calculation.Assuming a significance level of α=0.05 and a test power of β=0.2,with a 1:1 ratio of sample sizes between the two groups,the total sample size was calculated to be 198 using the PASS software(PASS 2023).Considering a dropout rate of 10%,a total of 220 subjects were required,with 110 subjects in each group. 1. experimental group The patients were given intravenous injection of 0.25 mg / kg esketamine, 1.5 mg / kg propofol and 1 mg / kg succinylcholine in turn. After anesthesia, the patients were given electroconvulsive therapy. 2. In the control group The patients were given normal saline consistent with esketamine injection volume, 1.5mg/kg of propofol and 1mg / kg of succinylcholine. After anesthesia, the patients were given electroconvulsive therapy. Efficacy evaluation 1. Main efficacy indicators Response rate of depressive symptoms after MECT treatment Response is defined as two consecutive HAMD-24 scores ≤ 50% before treatment after receiving MECT treatment. The response rate is calculated as the number of patients who achieved as response divided by the total number of patients receiving MECT.In this study, the 24-item version of HAMD was utilized. Participants will: Be randomly assigned to the esketamine group or the control group, and receive standard MECT treatment. Have seizure parameters, seizure duration, vital signs, and complications recorded. Complete psychiatric scale assessments, including HAMD-24, BSS, PANSS, WMS-RC and MoCA. Be assessed at the following time points: HAMD-24 and BSS after each treatment; PANSS after each treatment course;WMS-RC and MoCA before MECT and after one treatment course. All subjects did not discontinue antidepressants before modified electroconvulsive therapy(MECT),and they were fasting for 8 hours and no fluids for 2 hours.Three minutes before MECT,continuous qCON monitoring(Apollo-9000A,Chongqing Xideer Medical Equipment Co.,Ltd.,China)was initiated,while monitoring blood pressure,heart rate,and peripheral capillary oxygen saturation.Preoxygenation was administered for 3 minutes.The qCON monitor uses three electrodes on the forehead to collect raw electroencephalogram(EEG)signals.The qCON monitoring includes the qCON index,qNOX index,burst suppression(BS),and signal quality index(SQI).

Participants needed: 220
Trial details
Phase: Early Phase 1Age: 13-17Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: Min SuUpdated: Jan 7, 2026Locations: 2
Eligibility criteria

Inpatients diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder according to the Internation... [+5]

Severe cardiovascular disease,significant arrhythmias,or other cardiac condition... [+6]

Status: Recruiting

Quantitative Consciousness Index Monitoring (qNOX) of Sedation During Endoscopy

Nociception is the encoding and processing of noxious stimulation and is considered an objective indicator for monitoring pain. Currently, a new clinically-applied medical-engineering integrated monitoring device for noxious stimulation response has emerged. Its fundamental principle is based on the monitoring of electroencephalographic (EEG) activity, incorporating two monitoring parameters: the quantitative consciousness (qCON) index and the quantitative nociceptive (qNOX) index. This device enables more precise monitoring of anesthesia depth, quantification of patients' anesthesia analgesia and stress levels, and reliable monitoring of responses to noxious stimulation. During tracheal intubation for general anesthesia, when the qCON value falls within the range of 40 to 60 and the qNOX value is between 30 and 50, it indicates that the patient is in an appropriate state of sedation and analgesia. However, there is currently no universally acknowledged standard for the optimal qNOX reference range during conscious sedation endoscopy. Therefore, this study utilizes the noxious stimulation response index (qNOX) to monitor noxious stimulation during the procedure, aiming to identify the best timing for inserting the endoscope during conscious sedation endoscopy and explore the appropriate range of qNOX for this purpose.

Participants needed: 900
Trial details
Age: 18-60Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: Min SuUpdated: Jun 2, 2025Locations: 1
Eligibility criteria

Age between 18 and 60 years old; [+4]

Patients requiring complex endoscopic techniques for diagnosis and treatment; [+8]

Status: Recruiting

Anesthesia Induction Scheme for Painless Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Patients Based on Nociceptive Stimulation Monitoring

Nociception is the encoding and processing of noxious stimulation and is considered an objective indicator for monitoring pain. Currently, a new clinically-applied medical-engineering integrated monitoring device for noxious stimulation response has emerged. Its fundamental principle is based on the monitoring of electroencephalographic (EEG) activity, incorporating two monitoring parameters: the quantitative consciousness (qCON) index and the quantitative nociceptive (qNOX) index. However, in the context of sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy, how the dynamic changes of the quantitative consciousness index (qCON) and the quantitative nociception index (qNOX) reflect the depth of sedation and nociceptive response remains unclear. Safe and effective sedation monitoring includes both direct visual monitoring and physiological monitoring, that is, monitoring the patient's hemodynamics and depth of sedation. This study utilizes qCON and qNOX monitoring to assess the sedation and analgesic states of patients undergoing painless gastroenterological endoscopy. By combining visual assessment (cough reflex, respiratory depression, and limb movement) with clinical physiological monitoring (vital signs monitoring and pulse oximetry), the aim is to explore the optimal sedation range for gastrointestinal endoscopy under sedation, providing new anesthesia monitoring tools for clinical use.

Participants needed: 220
Trial details
Age: 18-60Biological sex: AllType: ObservationalSponsor: Min SuUpdated: Mar 6, 2025Locations: 1
Eligibility criteria

Aged 18-60 years old; [+4]

Pregnant or breastfeeding women; [+8]