Clinical trials

The study is meant to run parallel to the larger study, RESET. The goal of this study is to to evaluate the effectiveness of a once-off general and personality-tailored text message on GP consultation among RESET participants identified to have high LDL-C. The main question it aims to answer is: Will participants exposed to personality tailored advice have a higher adherence to GP consultation compared to the participants in the control group? Researchers will compare a personalized message to a general message (with no personalization according to patients personality type) and control group to see if the messages increase adherence. Participants are required to complete two questionnaires: one before and one after they receive their RESET results.

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the Lifestyle Intervention for Gentle, Healthy Transformation and Enhanced Weight Reduction-metabolic syndrome (LIGHTER-MetS) program on dietary self-regulation and cardiovascular risk among individuals with metabolic syndrome (MetS). The LIGHTER-MetS program, a community-based, grassroots-led initiative, integrates health coaching with the eTRIP© app to promote sustainable lifestyle changes focusing on diet, exercise, and emotion regulation.

Fluid overload and hypertension are prevalent in children undergoing chronic peritoneal dialysis (PD), especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). These complications often lead to increased hospitalizations, higher medication use, and, in some cases, conversion to hemodialysis. Icodextrin is used to enhance ultrafiltration (UF) and reduce glucose exposure, but its effectiveness in children with a single long dwell has been inconsistent. Preliminary observations suggest that shorter, twice-daily icodextrin exchanges may improve UF and blood pressure (BP) control. However, no randomized trial has evaluated this approach in pediatric patients.

This study aims to compare modified CAPD (M-CAPD) and conventional CAPD (C-CAPD) in terms of delivering high-quality, goal-directed PD as well as avoiding resource wastage in prevalent ESKD patients aged 2 to ≤18 years using a randomized cross-over study design for one year. This study hypothesizes that M-CAPD will have better ultrafiltration and solute clearance than C-CAPD. Specific objectives 1. To determine the ultrafiltration efficiency by measuring the following: 1. Clinical parameters: blood pressure, weight, evidence of fluid overload by the presence of edema, abnormal heart sounds (S3 gallop), lung crackles or rales, increased heart rate (tachycardia), rapid breathing (tachypnea), 2. Change in the number of blood pressure medications before and after the intervention, 3. Absolute and relative fluid overload using bioimpedance analyzer (BIA), 4. Mean daily ultrafiltration (UF) or Total 24-h UF, 5. Residual kidney function: 24-hour urine output, 6. Glucose exposure 2. To determine the solute clearance adequacy by measuring the following: 1. Serum sodium, chloride, potassium, bicarbonate, serum albumin, calcium, and hemoglobin, 2. Phosphate clearance 3. Renal and peritoneal Kt/Vurea 4. Normalized protein catabolic rate (nPCR) 3. To measure caregiver burden using a Paediatric Renal Caregiver Burden Scale (PR-CBS).

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a transient hyperglycemic condition identified during pregnancy in women without a history of chronic diabetes. Evidence indicates that GDM can lead to various adverse health outcomes, including preterm birth, progression to pre-diabetes, and type 2 diabetes after delivery in mothers. Notably, GDM is becoming increasingly prevalent among Asian pregnant women due to rising rates of overweight and obesity, as well as genetic susceptibility. Despite growing recognition of GDM, its treatment efficiency and efficacy remain poor, primarily due to its heterogeneity, which is underpinned by various pathophysiological mechanisms. Therefore, a better understanding of GDM heterogeneity can aid clinicians in providing more targeted treatment and follow-up strategies for GDM mothers. This study aims to define GDM phenotypes based on in vivo cardio-metabolic profiles and treatment response during pregnancy, utilizing advanced technologies such as continuous glucose profiling and untargeted metabolite profiling. In this proposed 3-year pregnancy cohort study, the investigators will recruit 800 overweight or obese Asian pregnant women in early pregnancy, without a history of diabetes, and follow them through to delivery. The goal of the study is to develop systematic antenatal and postnatal screening, treatment, and intervention guidelines for mothers with GDM.

The goal of this study is to evaluate the effects of high frequency tPCS + TENS compared to Sham device stimulation + TENS (Control) in lower limb motor function recovery in stroke patients with hemiplegia or hemiparesis in the subacute stage.The main questions it aims to answer are: Primary objective - To evaluate the effects of high frequency tPCS + TENS compared to Sham device stimulation + TENS (Control) in lower limb motor function recovery, in stroke patients with hemiplegia or hemiparesis in the subacute stage Secondary Objectives - 1. To evaluate the effects of high frequency tPCS + TENS in treatment of lower limb spasticity related to stroke. 2. To evaluate the effects of high frequency tPCS + TENS in gait function improvement post stroke, including walking speed, mobility, balance and walking endurance. 3. To evaluate the effects of high frequency tPCS on pain, mood and QOL. Researchers will compare the effects of high frequency tPCS + TENS to a control group which involves intervention with Sham device stimulation + TENS. Participants will: * Be identified, recruited and have baseline assessments during screening period * First undergo a mandatory 2-hour device training at Visit 2 to ensure device competence. * Proceed with up to 7 days of habituation for device use and tolerability. * Carry out daily intervention sessions of 30 minutes for 30 days at home or inpatient setting. * Phone call follow-up (Telephone/ Video Call Interview) 2 weeks post intervention * Clinic visit at day 30 post intervention with allowance of + 7 days for study assessments * Clinic visit at day 90 post intervention with allowance of +/- 7 days for study assessments * Update study coordinators via messaging platforms with regards to device issues, adverse events, any other reporting or questions