Clinical trials

3

Search and review clinical trials. Use filters to narrow results by trial status, phase, treatment, biological sex and sponsor.

Condition / disease
Location
Status: Recruiting

Study to Assess the Impact of the Urine Test Cxbladder Triage Plus on the Number of Cystoscopies Performed on Patients With Invisible Blood in Their Urine.

This study includes adult patients who see a urologist because of blood in their urine. The amount is so small it can only be seen with a microscope. This is called microhematuria. There can be many reasons for microhematuria. One of them is bladder cancer. While bladder cancer is one of the biggest worries, it is only found in few of these patients. Most microhematuria patients will have a cystoscopy to look inside the bladder. During a cystoscopy, a small camera is inserted into the bladder. This is done through the urethra, the tube that passes urine from the bladder to the outside. In some patients it can cause pain or anxiety. Not all patients have a cystoscopy. Those that don't, usually return for a urine sample within 6 months. This is done to check if there is still blood in their urine. This study is conducted to find out if the use of "Cxbladder Triage Plus" changes the number of cystoscopies in microhematuria patients. Cxbladder Triage Plus is also called "Triage Plus". It is a lab test that was developed to check how likely urothelial carcinoma is present in the bladder. Urothelial carcinoma is by far the most common type of bladder cancer. For the test, the patient voids some urine into a cup. A laboratory then checks the urine of specific genetic material. Abnormalities can be a sign of urothelial carcinoma. The result indicates if the urine is more like most normal urine or more like that of urothelial carcinoma patients. The study is done to find out how Triage Plus changes the number of cystoscopies. Study participants first void urine into a cup. The urine is used for the Triage Plus test. The patients are then assigned to one of two groups. The assignment is random. This means the nobody can influence the assignment. The chance to be assigned to either group is the same. In the test group, the urologist will receive the Triage Plus result and discuss it with the patient. Together they decide whether to do a cystoscopy. In the control group, the urologist will not receive the Triage Plus result. The patient will also not get the result. The urologist and patient will follow standard of care to decide whether to do a cystoscopy. For test group patients, the study gives a recommendation whether to proceed with cystoscopy. It is based on the patient's Triage Plus result. The urologist and patient do not need to follow the recommendation. If the urologist does not follow it, they will complete a survey. The survey has only one question. It is asking for the reasons of the decision. After making their decision, patients will follow the chosen pathway. Data on the performed procedures are collected. The diagnosis will also be documented. Data will be collected for up to about 9 months. To see how Triage Plus changes the number of cystoscopies, these will be counted in each group and then compared.

Participants needed: 1,000
Trial details
Age: 18-88Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: Pacific Edge LimitedUpdated: Jul 2, 2026Locations: 20
Eligibility criteria

Microscopic hematuria (≥3 RBC/HPF or equivalent) on urine microscopy obtained wi... [+6]

Prior history of bladder malignancy. [+10]

Status: Recruiting

Detection and Risk Stratification in Veterans Presenting With Microscopic Hematuria

It is currently debated whether the use of invasive standard of care procedures, such as cystoscopy, a procedure which involves inserting a thin camera, called a cystoscope, into the bladder to look for signs of disease, is appropriate for patients with microscopic hematuria (blood in the urine that cannot be seen with the naked eye). This is because the risk of disease (bladder cancer - urothelial carcinoma) is relatively low in this population group, approximately 3%. Invasive procedures such as cystoscopy can cause anxiety and pain, in addition to other potential side effects. This has resulted in low admittance for cystoscopy among patients with hematuria (blood in urine) in urology clinics. Therefore, there is a need for a simpler, non-invasive test that can accurately detect the presence or absence of disease (urothelial carcinoma) in patients with microscopic hematuria. Cxbladder, a non-invasive, urine-based test, has the potential to fill this role.

Participants needed: 1,000
Trial details
Age: 18-89Biological sex: AllType: ObservationalSponsor: Pacific Edge LimitedUpdated: Apr 24, 2026Locations: 4
Eligibility criteria

Physically able to provide a voided urine sample from a bladder that has not bee... [+5]

Prior history of bladder malignancy. [+9]

Status: Recruiting

Longitudinal Bladder Cancer Study for Tumour Recurrence

Surveillance for recurrence of urothelial carcinoma (UC) requires frequent cystoscopy, which is invasive, expensive and time-consuming. An accurate urinary biomarker has the potential to reduce the number of cystoscopies required during post-treatment surveillance. This is a prospective, single arm, multi-center study using the diagnostic CxBladder test with subjects previously diagnosed with primary or recurrent UC and who are undergoing a schedule of investigative cystoscopies and treatment for the possible recurrence of UC presenting to qualified sites. To evaluate the performance characteristics of the CxBladder test, multiple consecutive urine samples will be collected during the course of surveillance.

Participants needed: 450
Trial details
Age: 18+Biological sex: AllType: ObservationalSponsor: Pacific Edge LimitedUpdated: Nov 10, 2025Locations: 7
Eligibility criteria

Low-, intermediate-, and high-risk surveillance subjects with a previous confirm... [+5]

Total cystectomy of the bladder, subjects with neo-bladders or illeal conduits [+5]