Clinical trials

This is a Phase II, multicenter, randomized controlled trial to assess the efficacy of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) in combination with maintenance therapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. The aim is to compare the efficacy of SBRT combined with maintenance therapy versus maintenance therapy alone. The primary outcome is the overall survival (OS) of patients, with secondary endpoints including progression-free survival (PFS), response rates, and quality of life assessments. The study will involve patients with unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma who are receiving chemotherapy and have stable disease. The hypothesis is that SBRT, by improving local control, can enhance the benefit of ongoing maintenance therapy and lead to better overall survival outcomes in this patient group.

This prospective single-center observational study will evaluate the concordance between recommendations generated by a locally deployed large language model and standardized multidisciplinary team recommendations for patients with rectal cancer. Consecutive adult patients with pathologically confirmed rectal adenocarcinoma who are scheduled for routine rectal cancer multidisciplinary team discussion will be enrolled. For each case, investigators will prepare a standardized de-identified clinical summary before the multidisciplinary team meeting. The same summary will be used for large language model generation and routine multidisciplinary team discussion. The large language model recommendation will not be disclosed to the clinical team and will not influence actual patient management. Concordance between the large language model recommendation and the multidisciplinary team reference recommendation will be assessed using predefined structured rules and blinded expert review.

In colorectal cancer (CRC), ICIs show strong therapeutic associations with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) status, while patients with proficient mismatch repair/microsatellite stable (pMMR/MSS) tumors exhibit poor responses. Dual immunotherapy may represent a promising strategy for MSS populations. The Dutch NICHE trial reported a 27% pathological response rate (4/15) in MSS CRC patients with clinical stage I-III disease treated with neoadjuvant ipilimumab plus nivolumab. In advanced or metastatic CRC, a study by Jin Li et al. demonstrated that iparomlimab/tuvonralimab combined with bevacizumab and the XELOX regimen achieved an objective response rate of 70.6% (95% CI: 56.2%-82.5%). Radiotherapy may synergize with ICIs through multiple immunomodulatory mechanisms. For pMMR/MSS LARC, combining CRT with ICIs holds promise to overcome the "immune-cold" tumor microenvironment and improve therapeutic efficacy. In this clinical trial, the investigators aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of integrating immunotherapy with CRT as a novel total neoadjuvant therapy for pMMR/MSS rectal cancer.

This single-center, prospective, single-arm Phase II clinical trial is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combining hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC, for up to 4 cycles) with iparomlimab/tuvonralimab plus bevacizumab followed by stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage C hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who present with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) or extrahepatic oligometastatic disease. The study aims to determine whether this combination strategy can prolong progression-free survival (PFS), while also improving overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and local control rate (LCR), as well as maintaining quality of life (QoL). In addition, the trial will systematically evaluate the safety profile and treatment-related toxicities associated with this regimen.

This prospective, multicenter, phase II randomized controlled trial compares the efficacy and safety of SBRT combined with systemic therapy versus systemic therapy alone in BCLC stage C hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The primary objective is to compare overall survival (OS) between the two arms. Secondary objectives include progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), quality of life (QoL), and incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs). Eligible patients will be randomized 2:1 to an experimental arm (SBRT + systemic therapy) or control arm (systemic therapy alone). Key inclusion criteria include BCLC C disease, Child-Pugh A-B liver function, ECOG ≤2, measurable disease per RECIST 1.1, and stable intrahepatic disease after initial systemic therapy for ≥3 months when applicable. The trial will also include predefined safety monitoring, QoL assessments (EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-HCC18), and exploratory biomarker analyses.

This study is a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled phase II clinical trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy (SFRT) compared to Conventional Radiation Therapy (CRT) in the treatment of soft tissue sarcoma (STS, minimum tumor diameter ≥5 cm). A total of 106 patients were enrolled and randomized in a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint is the objective response rate (ORR) of the target lesion at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-radiotherapy, assessed using RECIST 1.1 and Choi criteria. Secondary endpoints include the 1-year local control rate (LC) of the target lesion, progression-free survival (PFS), safety (per CTCAE v5.0), and quality of life (QoL, assessed by EORTC QLQ-C30). CRT is delivered at 3.0 Gy per fraction for a total of 15-20 fractions. SFRT comprises CRT at 3.0 Gy per fraction for 15-20 fractions, augmented by weekly high-dose vertices of 8-15 Gy per fraction for 3-4 fractions, aiming to enhance tumor control and potentially stimulate immune responses. This study is a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled phase II clinical trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy (SFRT) compared to Conventional Radiation Therapy (CRT) in the treatment of soft tissue sarcoma (STS, minimum tumor diameter ≥5 cm). A total of 106 patients were enrolled and randomized in a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint is the objective response rate (ORR) of the target lesion at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-radiotherapy, assessed using RECIST 1.1 and Choi criteria. Secondary endpoints include the 1-year local control rate (LC) of the target lesion, progression-free survival (PFS), safety (per CTCAE v5.0). CRT is delivered at 3.0 Gy per fraction for a total of 15-20 fractions. SFRT comprises CRT at 3.0 Gy per fraction for 15-20 fractions, augmented by weekly high-dose vertices of 8-15 Gy per fraction for 3-4 fractions, aiming to enhance tumor control and potentially stimulate immune responses.

This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Ivonescimab, a bispecific antibody targeting PD-1 and VEGF, in combination with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and chemotherapy for treating locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). The Phase Ib portion is a dose-escalation study to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and the recommended Phase II dose (RP2D) of Ivonescimab. The Phase II portion will assess the median progression-free survival (mPFS) of patients receiving Ivonescimab with SBRT (25-50Gy/5F) and modified FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy. The study aims to provide critical insights into treatment options for LAPC and inform future therapeutic strategies.

Neoadjuvant fluoropyrimidine-based chemoradiotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision (TME) is the standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC); however, pathologic complete response (pCR) rates are low. Trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) is a new oral anti-tumor oral formulation of nucleoside analogue, trifluridine (FTD), and a thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor, tipiracil (TPI). Previous studies have shown that TAS-102 has shown clinically relevant activity after fluoropyrimidine failure in colorectal cancer and may thus be of increased efficacy compared with current standard capecitabine chemoradiation. Also, a phase 2 trials conducted by our team have demonstrated that neoaduvant TAS-102 concurrent with long-course radiotherapy could lead to a high pCR rate of 32% with acceptable toxicity for LARC patients. Herein, we will conduct this multicenter, randomized controlled, phase III trial to explore the safety and efficacy benefit of TAS-102 concurrent with long-course radiotherapy for LARC.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide. Surgical resection is one of the primary treatment options for CRC; however, postoperative recurrence remains a significant clinical challenge for both the medical community and patients. Postoperative chemotherapy, as an important adjuvant therapy, is widely used in CRC patients aiming to reduce the risk of recurrence. Despite extensive research on the efficacy of postoperative chemotherapy in CRC, the mechanisms of postoperative recurrence, predictive factors, and strategies to enhance chemotherapy effectiveness remain unclear. For colorectal cancer patients who have achieved NED (No Evidence of Disease), the decision to either reinitiate or change the systemic chemotherapy regimen for newly developed pulmonary oligometastases remains controversial. Local treatment options for diagnosing oligometastases include surgery, radiotherapy, and radiofrequency ablation. However, whether systemic treatment should be added after local treatment in patients who have achieved NED remains uncertain , and this issue requires urgent resolution.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Its early clinical manifestations are often subtle, leading to late-stage diagnosis in about 30% of cases with distant metastases. Liver metastases are widespread and associated with poor prognosis, especially in terms of response to immunotherapy. This prospective study will evaluate the efficacy of combined therapy involving sintilimab, fruquintinib, and radiotherapy in CRC with liver metastases. The primary objectives are to assess progression-free survival, overall survival, and treatment response rates. This study aims to provide valuable insights into optimizing third-line and subsequent therapies for CRC with liver metastases by elucidating the efficacy and safety of this combined treatment approach.

Hypothesis: Survival benefits could be found in Sintilimab plus chemotherapy and radiotherapy in patients with inoperable pancreatic cancer.

Cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome is a common and severe complication in patients with advanced cancer, with a particularly high prevalence in pancreatic cancer. It is associated with systemic inflammation, metabolic disturbances, and dysregulation of central appetite control, leading to reduced quality of life, poor tolerance to anticancer therapy, and shortened survival. Anticancer treatments, including chemotherapy and immunotherapy, may further exacerbate the development and progression of cachexia. Megestrol acetate is recommended as a first-line treatment for cancer-related anorexia-cachexia syndrome by multiple international and national guidelines, based on its proven effects on appetite stimulation, weight gain, and quality of life improvement. The nanocrystalline formulation of megestrol acetate significantly enhances bioavailability and achieves effective plasma concentrations even in the fasting state, making it particularly suitable for patients with cancer cachexia. This randomized, controlled, prospective study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nanocrystalline megestrol acetate in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer complicated by cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome. The study will assess improvements in appetite, body weight, nutritional status, and quality of life, and explore the clinical value of early anti-cachexia intervention in the era of immuno-chemotherapy, providing evidence to optimize comprehensive treatment strategies for advanced pancreatic cancer.

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cadonilimab in combination with paclitaxel, cisplatin, and radiation therapy for the treatment of locally recurrent and oligometastatic endometrial carcinoma. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Does the combination therapy improve the overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety in participants? 2. What are the predictive biomarkers of treatment efficacy, and how can this information better guide the use of immune-oncology drugs in combination therapy? Participants will: * Receive cadonilimab, paclitaxel, cisplatin, and radiation therapy according to a specified protocol. * Visit the clinic for regular checkups and tests throughout the treatment period. * Be monitored for and have records kept of ORR, PFS, DCR, OS, and safety. * Provide hematologic and tissue samples to explore biomarkers. This study will help determine if this combination therapy can become a new standard of care for patients with locally recurrent and oligometastatic endometrial carcinoma, as well as identify biomarkers to better guide treatment strategies.

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is as sociated with shorter overall survival than other breast cancer subtypes, despite the use of curative-intent anthracycline- and taxane-based systemic chemotherapy. Neoadjuvant therapy is now also recognized as the standard treatment for patients with high-risk TNBC. The Keynote-522 study demonstrated that the application of pembrolizumab has raised the pathological Complete Response (pCR) rate in TNBC to over 60%, but nearly 40% of patients still do not achieve pCR. How to further improve the pCR rate in TNBC patients has become a hot topic of current research. Posaconazole is an antibiotic used to prevent invasive Aspergillus and Candida infections and to treat oropharyngeal candidiasis. Our preclinical studies have found that posaconazole can inhibit immune cell-mediated steroidogenesis to restrict TNBC tumor progression. The investigators design and begin a a prospective randomized controlled clinical study to explore the effectiveness of posaconazole in the neoadjuvant treatment of TNBC.

Previous studies suggest that among patients receiving trastuzumab monotherapy, a HER2/CEP17 ratio \>7.0 (ultra-high expression) is associated with poorer disease-free survival (DFS). Dual-target therapy (trastuzumab + pertuzumab) has become the standard treatment for high-risk HER2-positive breast cancer; however, whether it can predict outcomes in patients with ultra-high HER2 expression remains unsupported by clinical data. To analyze the clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic relationship between the HER2 ultra-high expression group and the normal expression group in non-metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer patients who received dual-target therapy.

This is an open-label, prospective, randomized, Phase III, international multicenter clinical study to compare radiotherapy plus nimotuzumab versus radiotherapy alone in platinum-ineligible patients with locoregionally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC),

This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant trastuzumab, pertuzumab and chemotherapy chosen by the investigators and identify the molecular characterization and subtypes in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer.

This multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label, two-arm Phase III clinical trial is designed to evaluate whether adding radiotherapy to oligoprogressive lesions while continuing first-line systemic therapy at the time of oligoprogression can effectively prolong progression-free survival compared to early switching to second-line systemic therapy in oligoprogressive hepatocellular carcinoma.

Gastrointestinal tumors, including esophageal cancer, gastric cancer, and colorectal cancer, are among the most common and highly prevalent malignant tumors in Shandong Province. Currently, most patients seek medical attention only after clinical symptoms appear, by which time the disease has already reached an intermediate or advanced stage. This leads to increased treatment costs and poorer therapeutic outcomes. Early detection and intervention through screening are effective measures to improve the cure rate of gastrointestinal tumors and reduce their incidence and mortality rates. This project leverages the Shandong Province Tumor Screening and Early Diagnosis \& Treatment Platform and is based on the ongoing Shandong Gastrointestinal Cancer Screening Cohort. It aims to collect 4,000 plasma samples from individuals undergoing simultaneous screening for esophageal, gastric, and colorectal cancers. Using Nanjing Shihe Medical Laboratory's independently developed multi-cancer early detection liquid biopsy product for gastrointestinal cancers, the study will further validate the performance of liquid biopsy in multi-cancer screening by correlating results with endoscopic findings (gastroscopy and colonoscopy).

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of lobaplatin versus carboplatin as neoadjuvant therapy for stage II / III HER-2 positive breast cancer. Arms and Interventions Control group : Docetaxeor albumin paclitaxel combined with carboplatin for 6 cycles. Trastuzumab combined with pertuzumab : 6 cycles of treatment, according to the instructions recommended dosage. Experimental group : Docetaxel or albumin paclitaxel combined with lobaplatin for 6 cycles. Trastuzumab combined with pertuzumab : 6 cycles of treatment, according to the instructions recommended dosage.

This is a randomized, controlled, prospective phase II, two-arm clinical study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of using either Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy (SFRT) or Stereotactic Central Ablative Radiotherapy (SCART) for treating the soft tissue components of malignant bone metastases. The study plans to enroll 90 patients with bone metastases accompanied by soft tissue formation, who will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio to the SFRT/SCART group or the conventional radiotherapy (CRT) group.The primary endpoint is the objective response rate (ORR). Tumor response to treatment will be assessed every 12 weeks (±7 days) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1). Secondary endpoints include pain relief rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. In addition, adverse events (AEs) will be monitored throughout the study.

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluation the efficacy and safety of iparomlimab and tuvonralimab, paclitaxel + cisplatin/carboplatin combined with radiotherapy of locally recurrent and oligometastatic cervical cancer.The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Does the combination therapy improve the overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety in participants? 2. What are the predictive biomarkers of treatment efficacy, and how can this information better guide the use of immune-oncology drugs in combination therapy? Participants will: * Receive iparomlimab and tuvonralimab, Paclitaxel + Cisplatin/Carboplatin and radiation therapy according to a specified protocol. * Visit the clinic for regular checkups and tests throughout the treatment period. * Be monitored for and have records kept of ORR, PFS, DCR, OS, and safety. * Provide hematologic、tissue and stool samples to explore biomarkers. This study will help determine if this combination therapy can become a new standard of care for patients with locally recurrent and oligometastatic cervical cancer as well as identify biomarkers to better guide treatment strategies.

Acute radiation skin injury is the most common side effect of radiation therapy in patients with chest tumors, which can be manifested as erythema, dry peeling, wet peeling, and severe ulcers. Even with current advanced radiotherapy techniques, such as intensity-modulated reverse radiation therapy (IMRT), about one-third of patients develop grade 2 or higher skin damage during radiotherapy. Radiation skin damage can cause discomfort to patients, thus affecting their daily life and reducing their quality of life. In severe cases, it can even reduce the efficacy due to prolonged treatment time. Therefore, prevention and treatment of acute radiation skin injury is a difficult problem to be solved urgently in clinical practice. Even with current advanced radiotherapy techniques, such as intensity-modulated reverse radiation therapy (IMRT), about one-third of patients develop grade 2 or higher skin damage during radiotherapy. Radiation skin damage can cause discomfort to patients, thus affecting their daily life and reducing their quality of life. In severe cases, it can even reduce the efficacy due to prolonged treatment time. Therefore, prevention and treatment of acute radiation skin injury is a difficult problem to be solved urgently in clinical practice. From previous studies, we found that taurine is an active substance that regulates normal physiological activities of the body and is widely distributed in various tissues and organs of the body. This substance has many advantages. Many previous studies have shown that taurine also has a wide range of biological functions such as anti-inflammatory, analgesic, maintaining osmotic pressure balance, improving visual function, regulating blood sugar, nerve conduction, endocrine activity, regulating lipid digestion and absorption, increasing cardiac contractility, improving immunity, enhancing cell membrane antioxidant capacity, protecting myocardial cells, etc. Considering the multiple medical values of taurine and its safety, we intend to conduct a phase I-II clinical study of taurine for external use in the prevention and treatment of acute radiation skin injury for radiation skin injury, with the study period from January 25,2024 to January 25,2027. The purpose is to evaluate the safety of taurine in the prevention and treatment of acute radiation skin injury in breast cancer patients after adjuvant radiotherapy. Possible benefits: Reduce the incidence and severity of radiation skin damage.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of pazopanib combined with TGI/CIV chemotherapy in children and adolescents with recurrent or refractory rhabdomyosarcoma.

This prospective, single-arm, exploratory, phase II study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Trilaciclib in reducing chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Eligible subjects screened by the inclusion and exclusion criteria will receive chemotherapy alone or combined with immune/targeted therapy and Trilaciclib for 4-6 cycles of continuous treatment. If the efficacy is not progressive after 4-6 cycles of treatment, the investigators can combine with Trilaciclib during immune and/or targeted maintenance therapy according to the specific conditions of the subjects until disease progression or intolerance. The efficacy of Trilaciclib will be evaluated by the incidence of grade ≥3 neutropenia during chemotherapy as the primary endpoint. After the progression of treatment, if the subjects were treated with chemotherapy for subsequent treatment and were considered to be able to use Trilaciclib according to the evaluation of the investigator, the use of treaclib could be considered until the subjects had disease progression again or were intolerant to treatment.