Clinical trials

Background: Inflammatory arthritis (IA) encompasses autoimmune rheumatic diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and axial spondyloarthritis. Fatigue is highly prevalent in people with IA with 41-57% suffering from severe fatigue. Patients describe fatigue as overwhelming, unpredictable, challenging to manage, and affecting all areas of everyday life, including the ability to work. Studies have shown that interventions with physical activity or a cognitive behavioral approach can significantly reduce fatigue severity and/or impact in people with IA compared to usual care. To date, no studies have investigated the combined effect of CBA and PA on fatigue severity and impact in patients with IA. Therefore, the goal of this study is to test the feasibility of a newly developed fatigue intervention that combines a cognitive behavioral approach and physical activity (COMFI) in patients with inflammatory arthritis, who experience fatigue as a challenge in their everyday lives in Denmark and Sweden. The intervention will be tested in 4 groups (2 in Denmark and 2 in Sweden), and the participants will participate in 7 group sessions and 2 focusgroups interview in the evaluation. The primary outcome for the participants is fatigue, measured through patient-reported outcomes at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months after baseline. This study will show if the intervention is feasible in practice and meaningful for the participants.

Background: Patients with inflammatory arthritis (IA) experience substantial impact of their disease despite optimal pharmacological treatment. To be able to manage these challenges effectively, patients require tailored self-management support from various professionals. We thus developed a six-month nurse-coordinated interdisciplinary self-management intervention (INSELMA), in collaboration with patients, clinicians and managers. A pilot study on the INSELMA intervention in 18 participants showed promising results. It is now relevant to test the intervention and compare it to a control group in a larger study . Objectives: The primary objective is to compare the efficacy of the INSELMA intervention to usual care (control group), on health related quality of life measured at baseline and end of intervention (6 months after baseline). Key secondary objectives are to compare the short and longer-term effect of INSELMA on changes in mental well-being, anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain, sleep, physical activity, global impact of the disease, work ability, self-efficacy for managing chronic disease and pain and health literacy relative to usual care from baseline to 6 and 12 months after baseline and on quality of life from baseline to 12 months after baseline. Method: A pragmatic randomised trial with a two-group parallel design. All participants will be randomly allocated to the intervention or usual care only . Both groups will receive usual care. The INSELMA intervention group will be assigned a coordinating rheumatology nurse who performs an initial biopsychosocial assessment. Based on the assessment, the nurse and the patient agree on which activities and goals to work towards for the following six months. The coordinating nurse can refer the patient to see a physiotherapist, an occupational therapist or social worker if needed and can help identify offers in the patients' municipality. The primary endpoint will be change in quality of life from baseline to 6 month after baseline. Key secondary outcome measures are collected to compare the effect of INSELMA on changes in mental well-being, anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain, self-efficacy for managing pain, physical function, global impact of the disease, sleep problems and acceptable symptoms relative to usual care from baseline to 6 and 12 months after baseline.

People with chronic inflammatory arthritis (IA) (rheumatoid arthritis, axial spondyloarthritis, and psoriatic arthritis), often have a reduced work ability. Up to 40% lose their job in the first years after diagnosis. Consequently, they are at high risk of losing their jobs and being permanently excluded from the labour market. Therefore, a new context-specific vocational rehabilitation (VR) for people with IA was developed, based on the Medical Research Council's framework for complex interventions. The 6-months VR is called WORK-ON and consists of three parts: 1) a coordinating occupational therapist who performs an initial assessment and goalsetting process and supports cooperation between relevant partners and navigation between sectors, 2) Four group sessions with peers and if needed, 3) Individual sessions with a social worker, nurse, or physiotherapist. The objective of the WORK-ON trial is to test the overall efficacy on work ability compared to a control group who receives usual care and pamphlets for their employer and colleagues. Based on the experiences from a feasibility study, WORK-ON will be conducted as a randomised controlled trial. Patients with IA, aged 18 years or older, experiencing job insecurity will be randomised to one of two groups: the WORK-ON VR group or usual care (control group). The primary outcome; work ability measured is measured by Work Ability Index single item, at baseline, 6, 12, 18 and 30 months after baseline. Secondary outcomes are absenteeism, presenteeism, overall work impairment, activity impairment, job loss, quality of life, mental well-being, fatigue, sleep, physical activity, occupational balance and pain. Secondary outcomes are measured at baseline, 6 and 12 months after baseline. In addition, work ability, working hours per week and job loss are measured at 18 and 30 months after baseline.