Clinical trials

Randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy and safety of oxfendazole at 20 mg/kg per dose in one and two dose regimens with a two-dose regimen of triclabendazole at 10 mg/kg in an endemic region of the highlands of Peru. Adults with fascioliasis in rural communities will be screened for inclusion and exclusion criteria and a total of 336 subjects (112 per study arm) with chronic Fasciola infection will be enrolled and assigned randomly to the study arms in a 1:1:1 ratio. The primary efficacy (cure and egg reduction) endpoints will be assessed on day 7 and 30 post treatment. The secondary safety endpoint visits will be performed in days 0, 3, 7 and 30 post-treatment and Population Pharmacokinetics (PK) modeling studies will be performed in the first 24 hours after the first dose of oxfendazole.

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare a single and multiple dose regimens of oxfendazole with the standard treatment in patients with mild (one or two lesions) parenchymal brain cysticercosis. The main question it aims to answer is if OXF will enhance clearance of brain parasites and therefore provide greater cysticidal efficacy, with the potential to provide a single-dose therapy for this type of NCC. The study cohort will also allow us to identify early imaging markers that predict lesion resolution, as well as factors associated with residual calcification or focal gliosis after lesion resolution. This study will also provide additional information on the safety of the study interventions.

The COHESION-I project will evaluate the effects of the co-creation intervention (2016 to 2019) and the co-design intervention (2023 to 2024) on improving (a) health system responsiveness, and (b) patient satisfaction, at the primary health care level, in Peru, Nepal and Mozambique, in relation to chronic diseases (hypertension, and diabetes mellitus), as well as specific neglected tropical diseases. Each intervention has been tailored to the context and characteristics of each one of the aforementioned low- and middle-income countries. For this quasi-experimental study, three arms were established: the co-creation (2016 to 2019) + co-design (2023 to 2024) arm; the co-design only (2023 to 2024) arm; and the control group (no intervention; usual care). The evaluation will be composed of four types of evaluations: quantitative; qualitative; economic; and process evaluation

Current standard therapies with chemotherapy (CT) for Cutaneous Leishmaniasis (CL) are expensive, toxic/allergenic, frequently ineffective, burdensome, and often unavailable. Thermotherapy is a clinically validated first line alternative for the treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in South America. However, current heat-delivery modalities are either too costly or lack governmental approval required to be made widely available to endemic areas. The investigators have adapted a reliable, safe, and low-cost heat pack for Cutaneous Leishmaniasis that the investigators have named the HECT-CL device. In this pilot study the investigators will enroll 25 patients who have either failed or are not candidates for pentivalent antimonies. The hypothesis states that the HECT-CL device demonstrates efficacy non-statistically inferior to estimates for current South American Pentavalent Antimonial cure rates (76%) while demonstrating basic safety and tolerability.