Clinical trials

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether coronary CT angiography (CCTA)-guided planning improves the efficiency and outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in adults with coronary artery disease. It will also evaluate the feasibility and safety of using a CT-based "virtual PCI plan" during coronary interventions. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does CCTA-guided PCI reduce procedural time, radiation exposure, and contrast dye use compared with standard PCI? * Does CCTA-guided PCI improve procedural outcomes and stent optimization? * How often do operators follow or deviate from the CT-based procedural plan? * What medical problems or complications occur during and after CCTA-guided PCI? Researchers will compare CCTA-guided PCI with standard angiography-guided PCI to determine whether CT-derived procedural planning improves PCI efficiency and clinical outcomes. Participants will: * Undergo PCI guided either by a CCTA-based virtual planning strategy or by standard clinical practice * Attend follow-up assessments at 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year * Undergo routine clinical evaluations and imaging assessments related to their PCI procedure * Be monitored for procedural complications, symptoms, repeat procedures, and cardiovascular outcomes during follow-up The study will also include a parallel observational registry for patients whose coronary lesions are deferred from PCI, to evaluate their long-term clinical outcomes.

The goal of this observational study is to learn if AI-assisted cardiac CT imaging can improve cardiovascular risk stratification and prediction of future coronary events in an adult population undergoing clinically indicated cardiac CT. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Can AI-enhanced cardiac CT accurately assess cardiovascular risk in a real-world adult population? * How do CT-derived plaque characteristics correlate with clinical, biochemical, and lifestyle risk factors? Researchers will compare subgroups (e.g., patients with different risk profiles, biomarkers, or imaging findings, and a subset undergoing OCT imaging) to see if differences in imaging and clinical parameters are associated with cardiovascular risk and plaque vulnerability. Participants will: * Provide informed consent and medical history/demographic information * Undergo blood sampling for cardiovascular and metabolic biomarkers * Have a resting ECG performed * Complete a detailed lifestyle and health questionnaire * Receive a non-invasive cardiac CT scan interpreted by an expert * Potentially receive heart rate-lowering medication (e.g., metoprolol) if required for imaging quality * Be referred for further clinical evaluation if clinically indicated 

What is this study about? This study is comparing two different methods nurses use to place an intravenous (IV) drip, which is needed for many cancer treatments. Traditional method: The nurse finds a vein by touch and sight. Ultrasound-guided method: The nurse uses a small, handheld ultrasound scanner to see the vein under the skin to help guide the needle. Why is it important? Sometimes it can take more than one attempt to get an IV drip in place, which can be uncomfortable. For cancer patients, whose veins can be more fragile, this is a common challenge. This research will help us find out if using ultrasound helps get the IV in successfully on the first try more often, which can make the treatment experience better. What does participation involve? If you choose to take part, you will be randomly assigned (like a coin toss) to have your IV placed with either the traditional method or the ultrasound method. The research team will then collect some information about the IV placement. Your participation is entirely voluntary and will not affect your standard medical care.