Clinical trials

3

Search and review clinical trials. Use filters to narrow results by trial status, phase, treatment, biological sex and sponsor.

Condition / disease
Location
Status: Not yet recruiting

Effects of Timed Restricted Eating on Body Composition, Metabolism, and Cardiovascular Health

This study is looking at whether eating all meals within a 6-hour window each day (called Time-Restricted Eating, or TRE) can improve body composition, metabolism, heart health, and blood markers over 12 weeks. The study also wants to find out whether allowing participants to eat normally on weekends makes the diet easier to follow long-term. Adults aged 18-65 with a BMI of 26 or higher who do not have heart disease or diabetes may be eligible. Participants will be randomly placed into one of two groups: (1) TRE every day for 12 weeks, or (2) TRE on weekdays with normal eating on weekends. All participants will visit the lab twice - once at the start and once at the end - for measurements of body fat, resting calorie burn, heart function, and blood tests. Between visits, participants will log their meals and steps at home and check in with the research team every two weeks.

Participants needed: 60
Trial details
Age: 18-65Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: University of South AlabamaUpdated: May 12, 2026
Eligibility criteria

Between 18 and 65 years of age [+6]

Younger than 18 or older than 65 years of age [+12]

Status: Recruiting

Low Voltage Electrical Stimulation for Depression in Parkinson's Patients

The goal of this clinical trial is to determine the relative efficacy of fMRI model guided Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (mgTDCS) in improving the depressive symptoms of patients with Parkinson's Disease (PD). The main questions it aims to answer are: 1) Can the use of mgTDCS significantly improve the self-reported level of depression and apathy in patients with PD from pre-intervention to post-intervention compared to a sham control? 2) Can the use of mgTDCS significantly normalize the cortical eeg alpha asymmetry so commonly seen in depressed patients compared to sham mgTDCS? 3) Can the use of mgTDCS significantly improve scores on neuropsychological tests of working memory?

Participants needed: 40
Trial details
Age: 19-65Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: University of South AlabamaUpdated: Apr 6, 2026Locations: 1
Eligibility criteria

19 to 65 years in age. [+5]

No history of or being treated for epilepsy or other seizure disorders. [+2]

Status: Not yet recruiting

Comparing Intramuscular Fentanyl and Ketorolac With Nerve of Arnold (NOA) Block for Bilateral Myringotomy

Background: Bilateral myringotomy with tympanostomy tube (BMT) placement is one of the most common pediatric surgical procedures. Despite its brief duration, many children experience significant postoperative pain. Current standard care typically involves intramuscular (IM) administration of an opioid (fentanyl) combined with a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (ketorolac). While this multimodal approach provides adequate pain control for approximately 75% of children, it is associated with opioid-related side effects including respiratory depression, nausea, vomiting, and sedation. Additionally, nearly one-quarter of children still experience moderate-to-severe pain despite this regimen. The Nerve of Arnold block is a regional anesthesia technique that involves injection of local anesthetic near the auricular branch of the vagus nerve, which provides sensory innervation to the external auditory canal and tympanic membrane. This technique offers the potential for targeted, opioid-sparing analgesia with extended duration and minimal systemic side effects. However, high-quality evidence comparing this regional technique to standard systemic analgesia in pediatric patients is lacking. Study Objective: This study aims to determine whether the Nerve of Arnold block is non-inferior to the standard combination of IM fentanyl and IM ketorolac in controlling postoperative pain in children undergoing BMT placement. Study Design: This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority trial. Three hundred children aged 6 months to 6 years scheduled for bilateral myringotomy with tympanostomy tube placement will be randomized 1:1 to receive either: (1) Standard care: IM fentanyl (1-2 mcg/kg) plus IM ketorolac (0.5 mg/kg) with sham Nerve of Arnold block, or (2) Intervention: Bilateral Nerve of Arnold block with bupivacaine 0.25% plus sham IM injections. Both patients and outcome assessors will be blinded to treatment assignments. Primary Outcome: The proportion of patients experiencing moderate-to-severe pain (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability \[FLACC\] scale score ≥4) in the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU). Non-inferiority will be declared if the upper bound of the 95% confidence interval for the difference in proportions is less than 10 percentage points. Secondary Outcomes: Secondary outcomes include mean and maximum FLACC scores, rescue analgesic requirements, respiratory depression, postoperative nausea and vomiting, PACU length of stay, parent satisfaction, and pain at 24 hours postoperatively. Clinical Significance: If the Nerve of Arnold block is shown to be non-inferior to standard care, it could provide a valuable opioid-sparing alternative for postoperative pain management in pediatric ear surgery, potentially reducing opioid-related adverse events while maintaining effective analgesia. This would be particularly beneficial for patients with contraindications to opioids or NSAIDs and aligns with national efforts to reduce opioid exposure in pediatric populations.

Participants needed: 300
Trial details
Phase: Phase 4Age: 6-6Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: University of South AlabamaUpdated: Dec 11, 2025Locations: 1
Eligibility criteria

Allergy to study medications (fentanyl, ketorolac, bupivacaine)