Clinical trials

2

Search and review clinical trials. Use filters to narrow results by trial status, phase, treatment, biological sex and sponsor.

Condition / disease
Location
Status: Not yet recruiting

Comparative Efficacy of hUCMSC-Secretome Delivered Via Microneedling and Intradermal Microinjection as Adjuvant Therapy to NB-UVB in Nonsegmental Vitiligo: A Quasi-Experimental Study

The goal of this clinical trial is to analyze the effectiveness of SM-hUCMSC secretome administered via microneedling and intradermal microinjection as adjuvant therapy to NB-UVB, compared with NB-UVB alone, in terms of repigmentation, onset of improvement, safety, patient satisfaction, and vitiligo recurrence. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Are there differences in the level of vitiligo lesion repigmentation among the secretome therapy via microneedling, intradermal microinjection, and NB-UVB phototherapy groups? * Are there differences in the time to onset of repigmentation among the treatment groups? What are the safety profiles and adverse events associated with each treatment modality? * Are there differences in patient satisfaction and quality of life after undergoing each therapy? * Are there differences in vitiligo recurrence rates during the follow-up period among the treatment groups? Participants will be allocated into three groups as follows: * Group A receives NB-UVB combined with microneedling and topical 10% secretome. * Group B receives NB-UVB combined with intradermal secretome injection. * Group C receives NB-UVB alone. The intervention period lasts 12 weeks, with follow-up until week 24.

Participants needed: 150
Trial details
Phase: Phase 2, Phase 3Age: 18-60Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: Yohanes Firmansyah, dr, MH, MMUpdated: Apr 3, 2026Locations: 1
Eligibility criteria

Patients with a diagnosis of non-segmental vitiligo (established by a dermatolog... [+6]

Segmental, universal, or other vitiligo types that are difficult to standardize... [+7]

Status: Not yet recruiting

Comparative Effectiveness of Clindamycin-Retinoid, Clindamycin-Retinoid-Dexamethasone, and 10% SM-hUCMSC Secretome Gel in the Improvement of Mild-to-Moderate Acne Vulgaris

The goal of this clinical trial is to etermine and compare the effectiveness of three therapeutic regimens for mild to moderate acne vulgaris, such as, clindamycin-retinoid combination, clindamycin-retinoid-dexamethasone combination, and sekretome SM-hUCMSC 10% gel. The main questions it aims to answer are : * Is there a change in the number of inflammatory lesions (papules, pustules, nodules) and non-inflammatory lesions (open and closed comedones) before and after treatment in each treatment group? * Is there a difference in the reduction of acne vulgaris severity scores among the three treatment groups? * Are there differences in the rate of clinical improvement (time required to achieve a certain reduction in lesion count or severity score) among the treatment groups? * What are the incidence and characteristics of local adverse effects (erythema, burning sensation, skin dryness, irritation, hypo-/hyperpigmentation, and others) in each treatment group? * Are there differences in the impact of each therapeutic regimen on the risk of acne scar formation and improvement in skin quality (texture, elasticity, and color homogeneity)? * Does secretome gel demonstrate sufficient clinical potential and urgency as a safer and more prospective topical therapeutic alternative for acne vulgaris compared with retinol-clindamycin and retinol-clindamycin-dexamethasone 0.1% combinations? Participants will be allocated into three groups using simple block randomization. * Group A will receive a combination of clindamycin and a retinoid, applied thinly to the entire facial area once daily at night. * Group B will receive a combination of clindamycin, a retinoid, and dexamethasone, with the same method of application as Group A. * Group C will receive 10% SM-hUCMSC secretome gel, applied thinly to acne-affected areas twice daily (morning and night).

Participants needed: 189
Trial details
Phase: Phase 1, Phase 2Age: 15-40Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: Yohanes Firmansyah, dr, MH, MMUpdated: Apr 1, 2026Locations: 1
Eligibility criteria

Age 15-40 years. [+5]

Presence of other facial skin diseases that may interfere with acne assessment (... [+6]