Clinical trials

The SUBMO-PIC01-2025 study evaluates whether SUBMO®, a submucosal injection hydrogel composed of high-molecular weight hyaluronic acid and methylene blue, is as effective and safe as normal saline for endoscopic resection of superficial colorectal lesions larger than 10 mm. Its primary aim is to determine non-inferiority in complete resection rates, whether en bloc or fragmented, and to assess safety through the systematic identification of serious adverse events. Secondary aims include analysing the total volume of product needed, the number of injections required, the maintenance of the submucosal cushion, the duration of the procedure, the ease of resection, the subjective evaluation of endoscopists, and the appearance of additional adverse events related to the intervention such as intraprocedural bleeding, fever, significant post-procedure pain, post-coagulation syndrome or immediate or delayed perforation. Eligible participants are adults aged 18 or older with a confirmed colorectal lesion greater than 10 mm that is technically resectable using EMR or ESD, who are capable and willing to follow the study procedures and who have signed informed consent prior to any protocol-specific action. Exclusion criteria include severe comorbidities corresponding to ASA IV or V unless specifically authorised by anaesthesia, coagulopathies that prevent endoscopic resection, endoscopic suspicion of invasive cancer, any condition deemed by investigators to compromise safety or adherence, known allergy to hyaluronic acid, methylene blue or excipients, contraindications to colonoscopy or sedation, participation in another clinical investigation within the previous 30 days, and pregnancy or breastfeeding. Participants may be withdrawn due to voluntary consent withdrawal, safety concerns, protocol deviations that affect data integrity or patient safety, loss to follow-up or pregnancy discovered during the study. The main efficacy variable is the technical success of resection as judged immediately by the endoscopist, while the main safety variable is the incidence of serious adverse events and their causal relationship with the investigational product. Exploratory variables include baseline demographics such as age, sex, ethnic origin and body mass index, anticoagulant or antiplatelet medication, and comorbidities including endoscopic history, obesity, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, haematologic disorders such as von Willebrand disease or haemophilia, and chronic liver disease. Baseline variables also include ASA classification and lifestyle habits. Polyp-related variables include size, number, anatomical location in the colon or rectum, LST subtype and JNET classification. Resection-related variables capture the technique used (EMR or ESD), whether the resection is en bloc or piecemeal, the number of fragments for calculating the Sydney Resection Quotient, the DMI score and any closure technique or complications. Treatment-related variables include total and per-surface area injection volume, number of submucosal injections needed, macroscopic evaluation of cushion maintenance, total procedure time, ease of resection using a visual analogue scale from 0 to 100, a usability questionnaire completed by the endoscopists and a detailed record of all adverse events including bleeding, fever, pain, post-coagulation syndrome and perforation.

This clinical investigation is a prospective, interventional, single-center study designed to assess the safety and effectiveness of BtH Body 2.2%, a cross-linked hyaluronic acid injectable intended for aesthetic volumization and contouring of large body areas. The study enrolls 80 adult participants who seek aesthetic improvement in the gluteal region, thighs, or abdomen. Each participant will receive a single session of subcutaneous injections, with the option for a touch-up treatment at four weeks if clinically justified, and will be followed for a total of nine months. The primary aim of the study is to determine whether BtH Body 2.2% produces a clinically relevant improvement in the treated area, assessed by the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS), and to evaluate the safety profile of the product by monitoring the incidence of serious adverse events throughout the study period. Secondary assessments will examine patient satisfaction, investigator-rated changes in aesthetic parameters such as volume, firmness, uniformity, elasticity, and overall appearance, as well as improvements in quality of life using validated questionnaires, including the Body Self-Esteem Scale and the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I). Objective measurements of skin hydration, elasticity, firmness, and topography will also be obtained using specialized biometric devices. The overall goal is to generate robust clinical evidence supporting the use of BtH Body 2.2% for safe and effective body contouring and volumization.

This prospective, randomized, single-blind, controlled clinical investigation evaluates the efficacy and safety of ZKARE®, a topical polymeric gel dressing, and its accessory applicator ZKAPI®, for the treatment of chronic, hard-to-heal ulcers. The study includes 134 ulcers of different etiologies-pressure ulcers, neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers, and venous leg ulcers-meeting predefined selection criteria. Participants are randomized to receive either ZKARE® in addition to standard wound care or standard care alone. The primary efficacy endpoint is the change in wound condition assessed through the RESVECH 2.0 scale, recorded at baseline and throughout treatment and follow-up visits. The primary safety endpoint is the incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs). Secondary outcomes include percentage and rate of wound closure, total closure rate, estimated time to full closure, quality-of-life measures (DLQI), patient satisfaction, investigator global assessment, cost-effectiveness, and product usability. The study aims to generate evidence on the performance, safety, and clinical usefulness of ZKARE® for chronic wound management.