A Comparative Study Between the Usage of Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Traditional Access Sheath in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgeries

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age14+
SponsorYosseif elhousseiny ammar ahmed

About this trial

A comparative study between the Usage of Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath (FANS) versus Traditional Access sheath in RIRS : Randomized controlled trial .

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Age ≥14 years old in patients not known to have stone forming medical conditions.

Renal stones diameter of ≤2 cm confirmed by CT with all types of configurations (branching & non-branching).

Non - recurrent cases with no history of previous open renal surgeries or PCNL with normal renal anatomy.

Patients with non - infected urine analysis.

Disqualifiers

Patients with abnormal urinary tract anatomy (such as horseshoe kidney or ileal conduit).

Patients with medical conditions promoting stone formation (hyperparathyroidism - gout).

Patients with history of stones on the same side with previous open surgical intervention or PCNL .

Patients with e-GFR < 60 ml / min.

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • FURS

Treatment groups

80 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups

Sponsors and collaborators

Yosseif elhousseiny ammar ahmed

Lead sponsor

Cairo University

Sponsor institution