Artificial Intelligence Versus Clinical Examination in White Spot Lesions Detection, Identification, And Scoring

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
Age20-60
SponsorCairo University

About this trial

The goal of this observational study is to compare the diagnostic accuracy of Clinical examination as a standard for detection, identification and scoring of White Spot Lesions Versus Artificial intelligence analysis of intraoral photographs. The photographs are examined by experienced dental professionals to maintain diagnostic accuracy. Machine learning models YOLO and Mask-RCNN will analyze these images in three phases: pre-analytical, analytical and post-analytical. A dataset of 329 labelled photographs, annotated by experts, is used to train these models. Data augmentation methods enhance model performance, and accuracy is assessed against clinical examination results to confirm reliability.

The main question it aims to answer is:

\- Is artificial intelligence analysis of intraoral photographs as accurate as clinical assessment in the detection, identification, and scoring of white spot lesions among adult Egyptian patients attending Cairo University Dental Hospital?

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Adult patients aged 20 - 60 years

Males or Females

Patients with white spot lesions of teeth 4 - Co-operative patients with interest in participation in the study

Disqualifiers

Patients with orthodontic appliances or bridgework that might interfere with evaluation and assessment

Patients with no white spot lesions

Patients with systematic diseases that might affect participation

Patients refusing to sign the informed consent or not willing to be part of the study

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Artificial Intelligence models (YOLO and MASK-RCNN)

Treatment groups

No treatment groups listed

Locations

This trial has no locations

Sponsors and collaborators