Comparing Articular Noise and Its Perception Between Two Different Types of Total Knee Arthroplasty

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorElsan

About this trial

Some patients complain of articular noise (such as clicking, snapping, cracking or popping) after a total knee replacement. Controversy remains about whether there is a correlation between articular noise and worse outcomes following a knee replacement. A study by Nam et al. on 1540 patients revealed an association between noise and residual symptoms 30 days after they received a total knee replacement. Conversely, a study by Kuriyama et al. on 60 patients revealed no correlation between noise and patient satisfaction after 1 year of receiving a total knee replacement. The incidence of noise following a knee replacement has rarely been studied as a primary outcome. Like pain, it could be considered an important patient-reported outcome to assess patient satisfaction. The study aims to compare the prevalence of patient-perceived noise of an ultra-congruent total knee prosthesis (Score 2, Amplitude) versus a posterior-stabilized total knee prosthesis (Anatomic, Amplitude).

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Adult patients receiving a primary TKA

Signed informed consent

Patients affiliated to a social security scheme

Patients willing and able to comply with study protocol requirements based on the investigator's judgment.

Disqualifiers

History of knee surgery on the concerned/studied knee (except arthroscopic surgery)

Patients presenting coronal deformities > 20°, varus laxity > 10° and/or valgus laxity > 15°

Patients receiving revision TKA

Pregnancy or breast-feeding

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • total knee arthroplasty

Treatment groups

170 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups

Sponsors and collaborators