Comparison of IV Analgesia, Thoracic Epidural Analgesia, and ESP Block for Chronic Pain After Open Heart Surgery

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
Age18-85
SponsorKaradeniz Technical University

About this trial

This prospective observational study aims to compare three routinely used postoperative analgesia techniques in patients undergoing open heart surgery: intravenous analgesia, thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA), and bilateral erector spinae plane block (ESPB). The primary objective is to evaluate the impact of these analgesia modalities on the development of chronic postoperative pain at 3 months. Secondary objectives include assessing postoperative acute pain scores, additional analgesic requirements, extubation time, mobilization time, intensive care unit stay, hospital stay, respiratory complications, and the relationship between acute and chronic pain. No intervention is assigned by protocol, and all analgesia methods are applied as part of routine clinical practice.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Adults aged 18 to 85 years

Classified as ASA physical status I-III

Scheduled to undergo open heart surgery with median sternotomy

BMI < 35 kg/m²

Disqualifiers

Age < 18 or > 85 years

BMI ≥ 35 kg/m²

Coagulation disorders

Infection at the intervention site

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Intravenous Analgesia
  • Thoracic Epidural Analgesia (TEA)
  • Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB)

Treatment groups

90 Participants
are divided into 3 treatment groups

Sponsors and collaborators