Comparison of Stress Response Evoked by Conventional Versus Videolaryngoscope
Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-60
SponsorSindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation
About this trial
Impact of using video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy technique in terms of improved hemodynamics post intubation and time taken for intubation.
Eligibility criteria
Qualifiers
ASA I & II
Age 18-60 years.
Preoperatively nonhypertensive and hemodynamically stable patients
Patients scheduled for elective procedures not involving airway surgeries
Disqualifiers
Patient refusal
ASA III, IV & V
Hemodynamically unstable patients
Patients with Hypertension and Ischemic Heart Disease (whether controlled or uncontrolled)
Trial design
Treatments tested in this trial
- Endotracheal Intubation through a Video Laryngoscope (VL)
- Endotracheal Intubation through a Direct Laryngoscope (DL)
Treatment groups
124 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groupsSponsors and collaborators
Source ClinicalTrials.gov