Comparison of the Effectiveness of Two Different Surgical Therapeutic Protocols of Peri-implantitis

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-80
SponsorNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens

About this trial

The purpose of the present study is to compare the 1-year clinical, radiographic and microbiological outcomes and patients' satisfaction following surgical treatment of peri-implantitis after applying two different surface modification methods. Secondarily, analysis and comparison of the microbiological results of implants diagnosed and treated for peri-implantitis with healthy implants will be performed.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Participants ≥ 18 years and ≤ 80 years of age

Non-smokers based on the patients' self-reported smoking status, defined as patients who had never smoked or had quit smoking at least 2 years ago

Implants in function for more than 1 year after suprastructure connection

Presence of at least one implant diagnosed with peri-implantitis defined as presence of bleeding on probing and/or suppuration, probing pocket depth ≥6 mm and ≥3 mm of detectable bone loss after initial re-modelling

Disqualifiers

Smokers

Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (HBA1c >7)

Treatment with bisphosphonates

Needing antibiotic prophylaxis

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Non-surgical peri-implant therapy
  • Implantoplasty
  • Erythritol Air-abrasive device
  • Prophylaxis

Treatment groups

45 Participants
are divided into 3 treatment groups