Peri-Implant Health

Evaluate whether the type of probe (plastic vs. metallic) modifies the accuracy of peri-implant probing in single-unit implants, by comparing the probing depth recorded with the prosthesis in place versus without the prosthesis (ΔPD, mm). Secondarily, explore the influence of prosthetic design and implant position on probing values and on other clinical and radiographic parameters.

An effective biological seal is crucial for protecting and supporting dental implants, particularly in the anterior region for the desired esthetic outcome.PRF membrane and CTG has been utilized to improve peri-implant soft tissue thickness and increase the width of keratinized tissue around dental implants. The stability of the PRF membrane is maintained by securing it with the healing abutment of the implant. While a few longitudinal studies have assessed the benefits of using PRF membrane with Sohn's Poncho technique in the posterior region, its effectiveness in the anterior region of the mouth remains to be evaluated.

This prospective randomized clinical trial will evaluate the clinical outcomes of the implant crown fabricated with standard scan body (control) and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) anatomic healing abutment (test).

The purpose of the present study is to compare the 1-year clinical, radiographic and microbiological outcomes and patients' satisfaction following surgical treatment of peri-implantitis after applying two different surface modification methods. Secondarily, analysis and comparison of the microbiological results of implants diagnosed and treated for peri-implantitis with healthy implants will be performed.

Maxillary posterior area is the most challenging site for dental implant placement. Indeed, complex remodeling processes, resulting in changes of the maxillary sinus and shape of the alveolar ridge will cause difficulties in rehabilitating the posterior maxillae sites. Various techniques have been proposed in order to achieve the necessary bone volume for the placement of long term successful implants. However, unbalanced crown to implant ratio remains a risk factor after successful dental implants installation following sinus graft. No study on humans assessed the effect of apical positioning of the implants in posterior grafted sites (sinus graft or sinus graft + vertical GBR) on the following clinical parameters: The peri-implant bone remodeling (vertical bone loss (mm) and probing depth (mm) around the implants, crown bulkiness, emergence profile and crown height, and Patients satisfaction, food impaction (PROM)). This study will elucidate these points and based on the parameter's results, suggest a treatment based classification facilitating the treatment decision-making of the clinicians in case of an atrophic posterior maxilla; aiming to ensure a long-term successful supra-implant rehabilitation which will maintain its bio-mechanically and biological success.

Objectives: To compare the influence of pre-fabricated titanium abutments and customized milled zirconia abutments on implant biocompatibility and the peri-implant region, as well as on radiographic bone loss and oral health-related quality of life. Detailed Methodology: This study is a randomized controlled clinical trial designed to evaluate the biological and clinical behavior of standardized titanium abutments compared with customized anatomical zirconia abutments in single implant-supported posterior restorations. The present investigation represents the prosthetic phase of a previously conducted randomized clinical trial that evaluated dimensional changes following different alveolar preservation protocols in posterior regions (CAAE: 59208422.8.0000.5418). In the previous phase, participants underwent tooth extraction and alveolar preservation procedures, followed by implant placement with Morse Taper (CM) implants (Biomorse XP, Bionnovation Biomedical) after a six-month healing period. After implant osseointegration, participants eligible for prosthetic rehabilitation will be randomly allocated to one of two parallel groups using a computer-generated randomization sequence (Sealedenvelope.com). The allocation ratio will be 1:1. Sample size calculation was performed using GPower software to ensure adequate statistical power. The intervention consists of prosthetic rehabilitation with either standardized titanium abutments (TiB group) or customized anatomical zirconia abutments (ZiT group), both supporting single zirconia crowns in posterior regions. All prosthetic and laboratory procedures will follow standardized clinical protocols. Clinical and laboratory assessments will be conducted at prosthesis delivery (baseline) and at 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up visits. Data collection will include peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) and biofilm sampling for biomolecular analysis, comprehensive periodontal clinical parameters, measurement of keratinized mucosa thickness, standardized periapical radiographs for marginal bone level assessment, and intraoral digital scanning for volumetric and soft tissue analysis. The primary objective is to compare peri-implant tissue stability and biological response between titanium and zirconia abutments. Secondary outcomes include clinical parameters, marginal bone level changes, and soft tissue dimensional stability over a 12-month follow-up period. This study aims to contribute to the understanding of how abutment material and design may influence peri-implant health and long-term tissue stability in posterior implant-supported restorations.

This study aims to evaluate the effects of autogenous grafts harvested from different palatal regions on the peri-implant mucosa when applied during second-stage dental implant surgery. Clinical, radiographic, and digital assessment methods will be used to investigate the early effects of these grafts on peri-implant mucosal width and thickness. In addition, peri-implant tissue health and patient-reported outcomes will be evaluated to compare the effectiveness of the grafting techniques in peri-implant soft tissue management.

Patients included in the study will be recruited after arriving at the Faculty of Dentistry of the University of Zagreb. During the clinical examination, the patient's periodontal status (bleeding during probing, and the depth of the pockets around the implant) and a control x-ray will be taken to check bone loss. Saliva sampling will occur at 3-time points, when establishing the diagnosis of periimplantitis, before the start of therapy, and at the first control after treatment.