About this trial
In patients requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) in the intensive care unit (ICU), continuous techniques are predominantly using due to better hemodynamic tolerance. The most employed techniques in ICU are continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) and continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD).
To our knowledge, there are no prospective studies comparing the efficiency of these two techniques with the same dose of dialysis (and the same filter).
In the CompEER study, we aim to compare the efficiency of CVVHD and CVVHDF on urea reduction rate in intensive care patients with acute kidney injury.
The research hypothesis is that CVVHD citrate technique is as effective as CVVHDF heparin technique for urea reduction and provides prolonged and stable clearance, facilitating antibiotic management during RRT.
Eligibility criteria
Qualifiers
Adult patients hospitalized in ICU
Undergo RRT session because of AKI stage 3
At least one among criteria: pH < 7,20 / Blood urea > 30mM / Fluid overload uncontrolled by with PaCO₂ < 35 mmHg or mixed acidosis with PaCO₂ < 50 mmHg.
Oliguria lasting 72 hours or longer
Disqualifiers
End-stage chronic kidney disease on dialysis
Intoxication with a dialyzable toxin (lithium
Criteria for emergency dialysis initiation: hyperkaliemia >6,5mM with electrocardiographic signs
Medical contraindication to regional citrate: severe liver failure
Trial design
Treatments tested in this trial
- CVVHD Dialysis parameters
- CVVHDF Dialysis parameters