Effect of Kinetic Control Retraining on Neck Proprioception and Functional Outcome in Patients With Cervical Radiculopathy

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age40-55
SponsorCairo University

About this trial

The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of kinetic control retraining on neck proprioception and functional outcome in patients with cervical radiculopathy.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Forty Four patients suffering from chronic cervical unilateral radiculopathy (symptomatic duration) (3 months to 1year).

Their age ranges 40-55 years, from both sexes.

Body mass index (BMI) of less than 30 Kg/m2

Cervical spondylosis (at the levels of C5-C6/C6-C7 confirmed by cervical MRI)..

Disqualifiers

Cervical myelopathy with evidence of pyramidal, posterior column, and or spinothalamic tract lesions.

Patients with decreased range of motion of cervical spine secondary to congenital anomalies, musculature contracture, or bony block.

Previous cervical or shoulder surgery or trauma.

Cervical instability caused by structural problem (e.g. ligament tear or spondylolithesis.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Selected physical therapy program

    Other intervention

    Both groups will receive a selected physical therapy program in the form of trans-cutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), moist hot pack, posture education, and strengthening exercises for deep neck flexors, for 30 minutes, 3 sessions per week, for 8 weeks.

  • Kinetic control retraining

    Other intervention

    Each patient in the experimental group will receive kinetic control retraining for 30 minutes, 3 sessions per week, for 8 weeks. Each session is based on the progression on the motor control rating scale (MCRS) related to kinetic control management frame. For each movement direction, specific control tests will be conducted. The direction and site of the uncontrolled movement will be evaluated using special tests in accordance with the pain history of the patient. The tests will be chosen according to the patient"s symptoms; screening of all patients will be done through at least three tests in each direction according to the patient"s symptoms.

Treatment groups

44 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Selected physical therapy program + Kinetic control retrainingExperimental treatment 2 interventions
Group B: Selected physical therapy programActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Evaluation of cervical proprioception using the cervical range of motion (CROM) device

Cervical proprioception will be assessed using the CROM device. Subjects will sit upright in a neutral head position with their trunk and shoulders secured by Velcro straps and will be blindfolded. The CROM unit will be calibrated to zero and secured on the head, with the magnetic yoke positioned on the shoulder. Two tests will be conducted: the Neutral Head Repositioning Test (NHR), where subjects rotate their heads left and return to neutral with accuracy measured in degrees, and the Target Head Repositioning Test (THR), where cervical range of motion will be tested, and subjects will reproduce a memorized target position. Each test will be repeated three times, with average angular displacement error calculated.

Time frame
8 weeks
2

Assessment of deep neck flexors (DNFs) strength by craniocervical flexion test (CCFT) using pressure biofeedback unit (PBU)

The craniocervical flexion test, a valid and reliable tool for assessing deep neck flexor (DNF) muscle performance, involves positioning the participant in a crook-lying position with a pressure biofeedback unit (PBU) placed under the head. The participant holds the PBU's dial to guide the test, which progresses through five stages based on the pressure exerted at a neutral head position (22, 24, 26, 28, and 30 mmHg). Starting at 20 mmHg, participants perform a slow head nod to incrementally increase the pressure by 2 mmHg, holding each increment for three seconds. Baseline performance is the maximum pressure held correctly for three seconds without substitution, monitored by the tester through palpation of superficial flexors.

Time frame
8 weeks

Secondary outcomes

1

Evaluation of neck pain intensity using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

The subject will be asked to make a handwritten mark on a 100 mm line (10cm). This line represents a continuum between no pain or discomfort (zero), to the worst pain (10) that the patient could feel. Measurements from the starting point of the scale to the patients' marks will be recorded and interpreted as their pain intensity. The results will be interpreted as: no pain (0-4 mm), mild pain (5-44 mm), moderate pain (45-74 mm), and severe pain (75-100 mm).

Time frame
8 weeks
2

Evaluation of neck-related functional performance using the Arabic version of Neck Disability Index (NDI)

The patient will answer each question by marking the box that best describes their problem, using a six-point scale from 0 (no disability) to 5 (major disability). The total score, out of 50, will be calculated by summing the item scores, with higher scores indicating greater disability. The results will be interpreted as follows: 0-4 = no disability, 5-14 = mild disability, 15-24 = moderate disability, 25-34 = severe disability, and above 34 = complete disability.

Time frame
8 weeks

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.