About this trial
This prospective, multicenter study compares the efficacy and functional outcomes of three surgical treatments for symptomatic Goligher Grade III internal hemorrhoids: Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty (LHP), Hemorrhoid Energy Therapy (HET), and conventional closed hemorrhoidectomy (Ferguson technique). Due to strong patient preferences in hemorrhoidal surgery, this study utilizes a pragmatic, preference-tolerant design. Eligible patients will undergo standardized counseling and select their preferred treatment arm. The study aims to evaluate whether minimally invasive energy-based therapies offer superior postoperative pain relief and faster functional recovery compared to conventional hemorrhoidectomy
Eligibility criteria
Qualifiers
Diagnosed with Goligher Grade III internal hemorrhoids.
Symptomatic with HDSS score >= 5.
Age 18-75 years.
Fit for general anesthesia or sedation.
Disqualifiers
Other anorectal diseases (fistula, abscess, IBD, malignancy).
Prior anorectal surgery within 6 months.
Pregnancy or lactation.
Contraindications to anesthesia.
Trial design
Treatments tested in this trial
- Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty (LHP)
- Hemorrhoid Energy Therapy (HET)
- Ferguson Hemorrhoidectomy
Treatment groups
Sponsors and collaborators
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Lead sponsor
Taiwan Colorectal Action Research, TCAR
Collaborator
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung
Collaborator
Jen-Ai Hospital Institutional Review Board
Collaborator
New Taipei City Hospital
Collaborator