About this trial
This prospective clinical study compares two cementation techniques for implant-supported zirconia fixed partial dentures on titanium bases (Ti-bases): extraoral cementation performed on the working model and intraoral cementation performed chairside. Thirty clinical cases with two osseointegrated implants requiring a multi-unit zirconia restoration will be recruited at the UIC Dental Clinic. For each case, two restorations with identical design will be produced: one will be cemented extraorally (control) and an identical replica will be cemented intraorally (test). Micro-deformation will be assessed as peri-implant microstrain (µε) using a standardized strain-gauge setup and the same recording protocol for both techniques. The primary analysis compares microstrain between intraoral and extraoral cementation within each case; implant/prosthetic events will be recorded descriptively.
Eligibility criteria
Qualifiers
Adults (≥18 years old) in good general health.
Presence of an edentulous space requiring rehabilitation with a three-unit implant-supported fixed bridge.
Presence of two already osseointegrated Essential Cone implants (Klockner) indicated for a three-unit implant-supported restoration in the edentulous area.
Ability and willingness to participate and attend study visits and follow-up.
Disqualifiers
ASA III or ASA IV.
Current or previous treatment with bisphosphonates.
Smoking >10 cigarettes/day.
Extraction in the study area <3 months before implant placement with incomplete healing.
Trial design
Treatments tested in this trial
- Extraoral cementation on Ti-bases
- Intraoral cementation on Ti-bases