Intraoral vs Extraoral Cementation of Zirconia Bridges on Ti-Bases: Microstrain Evaluation

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorUniversitat Internacional de Catalunya

About this trial

This prospective clinical study compares two cementation techniques for implant-supported zirconia fixed partial dentures on titanium bases (Ti-bases): extraoral cementation performed on the working model and intraoral cementation performed chairside. Thirty clinical cases with two osseointegrated implants requiring a multi-unit zirconia restoration will be recruited at the UIC Dental Clinic. For each case, two restorations with identical design will be produced: one will be cemented extraorally (control) and an identical replica will be cemented intraorally (test). Micro-deformation will be assessed as peri-implant microstrain (µε) using a standardized strain-gauge setup and the same recording protocol for both techniques. The primary analysis compares microstrain between intraoral and extraoral cementation within each case; implant/prosthetic events will be recorded descriptively.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Adults (≥18 years old) in good general health.

Presence of an edentulous space requiring rehabilitation with a three-unit implant-supported fixed bridge.

Presence of two already osseointegrated Essential Cone implants (Klockner) indicated for a three-unit implant-supported restoration in the edentulous area.

Ability and willingness to participate and attend study visits and follow-up.

Disqualifiers

ASA III or ASA IV.

Current or previous treatment with bisphosphonates.

Smoking >10 cigarettes/day.

Extraction in the study area <3 months before implant placement with incomplete healing.

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Extraoral cementation on Ti-bases
  • Intraoral cementation on Ti-bases

Treatment groups

30 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups