Nylon Versus Polyurethane Epidural Catheters In Patients Undergoing Major Orthopedic Surgery

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age21-60
SponsorDamanhour Teaching Hospital

About this trial

Objectives: To compare the safety and efficacy of nylon (polyamide) epidural catheter versus polyurethane epidural catheter in patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery under continuous epidural anesthesia.

Background: Continuous epidural anesthesia is the most common anesthetic technique used in orthopedic surgery. However, the use of epidural catheters is associated with complications. The insertion of the catheter may be associated with intravascular or intrathecal placement, nerve root irritation, paresthesia, kinking, hematoma, or breakage during catheter removal.

Patients and Methods: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial; carried out on 60 patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery under continuous epidural anesthesia. Patients were randomly allocated into two equal groups; group N, using Nylon catheter, and group P, using Polyurethane catheter.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status ≤ II

Age from 21 to 60 years

Body Mass Index (BMI) < 35

Disqualifiers

American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status > II

Age < 21 years or > 60 years

Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 35

Contraindications to regional anesthesia (including coagulopathy and infection at the injection site)

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Nylon (Polyamide) Epidural Catheter
  • Polyurethane Epidural Catheter

Treatment groups

60 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups

Sponsors and collaborators