About this trial
Objectives: To compare the safety and efficacy of nylon (polyamide) epidural catheter versus polyurethane epidural catheter in patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery under continuous epidural anesthesia.
Background: Continuous epidural anesthesia is the most common anesthetic technique used in orthopedic surgery. However, the use of epidural catheters is associated with complications. The insertion of the catheter may be associated with intravascular or intrathecal placement, nerve root irritation, paresthesia, kinking, hematoma, or breakage during catheter removal.
Patients and Methods: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial; carried out on 60 patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery under continuous epidural anesthesia. Patients were randomly allocated into two equal groups; group N, using Nylon catheter, and group P, using Polyurethane catheter.
Eligibility criteria
Qualifiers
American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status ≤ II
Age from 21 to 60 years
Body Mass Index (BMI) < 35
Disqualifiers
American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status > II
Age < 21 years or > 60 years
Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 35
Contraindications to regional anesthesia (including coagulopathy and infection at the injection site)
Trial design
Treatments tested in this trial
- Nylon (Polyamide) Epidural Catheter
- Polyurethane Epidural Catheter