One-stage Exchange in Candida Periprosthetic Infection a Suitable Way to go

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorUniversity Hospital, Strasbourg, France

About this trial

Accounting for only 0.7% to 3% of joint prosthesis infections, yeast infections are considered particularly difficult to treat. They are primarily caused by Candida yeasts, representing over 90% of cases.

Surgical treatment is the cornerstone of managing periprosthetic infections. In cases of chronic bacterial infections, complete implant replacement is necessary and can be performed either in one or two stages.

However, for chronic Candida spp. infections, two-stage prosthesis replacement remains the preferred option. Only three retrospective, single-center studies have evaluated the success rate of one-stage prosthesis replacement in periprosthetic Candida spp. infections in selected patients. Although the sample sizes of these studies are small, the 2-year success rate of 63% to 81% differs little from that of two-stage implant replacement (47% to 100%). Furthermore, systemic antifungal treatment is poorly defined. Recommendations are based on studies with a low level of evidence. The hypothesis is that a single-stage prosthesis replacement combined with appropriate antifungal treatment for chronic periprosthetic Candida spp. infection has the same outcome as a two-stage prosthesis replacement.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Patient aged over 18 years at the time of prosthesis revision

Operated on at the Strasbourg University Hospitals (HUS) between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2021

Hip or knee prosthesis revision

Possible or proven periprosthetic Candida spp. infection according to the EBJIS diagnostic criteria

Disqualifiers

Patient undergoing lavage, synovectomy, and implant preservation

Patient not receiving systemic antifungal treatment after prosthesis replacement

Patient with another proven Candida spp. infection or infective endocarditis

Patient for whom suppressive therapy was prescribed prior to surgery.

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Not listed

Trial groups

No trial groups listed