Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment vs Physiotherapy in Cervicocranial Dysfunction
Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-65
SponsorBurim Peli
About this trial
This study aims to compare the effects of osteopathic manipulative treatment and standard physiotherapy in patients with cervicocranial dysfunction. The study will evaluate outcomes including dizziness, headache impact, neck disability, and psychological stress.
Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: osteopathic treatment or standard physiotherapy. The interventions will be applied over a defined treatment period, and outcomes will be measured before and after the intervention.
The purpose of this study is to determine which approach is more effective in improving symptoms and functional outcomes in patients with cervicocranial dysfunction.
Eligibility criteria
Qualifiers
Age between 18 and 65 years.
Presence of cervicocranial symptoms for at least three months, indicating a chronic condition.
Neck pain with or without associated headache.
Dizziness associated with neck movement or cervical position.
Disqualifiers
Clinically confirmed vestibular disorders.
Central neurological disorders that may influence dizziness or balance.
Recent severe trauma to the cervical spine.
History of cervical spine surgery.
Trial design
Treatments tested in this trial
- Participants in this group will receive osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) targeting cervicocr
- conventional physiotherapy
Treatment groups
50 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groupsSponsors and collaborators
Burim Peli
Lead sponsor
International Osteopathic Academy, Milan
Sponsor institution
Source ClinicalTrials.gov