About this trial
Current clinical guidelines, such as those from the Surviving Sepsis Campaign and ARDSNet, recommend short-term NMBA use for patients with moderate to severe ARDS who exhibit persistent ventilator dyssynchrony or high plateau pressures despite deep sedation . However, they do not provide clear recommendations regarding the mode of administration. As a result, clinicians are left to extrapolate from limited or indirect evidence, which may lead to practice variation, uncertainty, and suboptimal care.
This pilot randomized controlled trial is designed to directly address this critical gap by comparing intermittent bolus administration versus continuous infusion of NMBAs in a pragmatic, real-world ICU setting. The study will assess feasibility metrics necessary to plan a definitive trial and generate preliminary clinical data on safety and effectiveness. By clarifying the comparative benefits and risks of each approach, the results may influence practice guidelines, reduce variation in care, and improve patient outcomes and reduce practice variation.patient outcomes, optimize resource use, and inform future guidelines on the management of moderate to severe ARDS.
Eligibility criteria
Qualifiers
Mechanically ventilated and on a controlled ventilation mode
Diagnosis of moderate to severe ARDS (PaO₂/FiO₂ ≤150 mmHg on PEEP ≥5 cm H₂O)
Bilateral pulmonary infiltrates consistent with ARDS
Randomized within 24 hours of meeting ARDS criteria
Disqualifiers
Pregnancy
Known allergy or contraindication to rocuronium
Neuromuscular disorders (e.g., myasthenia gravis, Guillain-Barré syndrome)
Brain death or decision for withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy
Trial design
Treatments tested in this trial
- Neuromuscular Blocking Agent - Bolus Dosing
- Neuromuscular Blocking Agent - Continuous Infusion