ARDS: Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

ARDS is a pathology with mortality rates reaching 40%. Invasive ventilation, the cornerstone of ARDS management, leads to "ventilation-induced lung injury" (VILI). An approach based on pressure-controlled ventilation with unassisted spontaneous respirations (PC-SV or APRV) can limit the occurrence of VILI. Time-controlled adaptive ventilation (TCAV) is based on high mean inspiratory airway pressure, while limiting expiratory time at low pressure. TCAV has shown positive effects in experimental and observational studies. However, its efficacy and safety in patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS remains to be evaluated. Evaluation of the efficacy of early application of TCAV compared to standard ventilation on the severity of alveolar damage leading to injury-related pulmonary edema in patients with moderate to severe ARDS After obtaining patient's consent, eligible patients will be included in this open-label, randomized controlled pilot study with stratification by minimization based on initial severity. The experimental group will be the TCAV group, where ventilator settings will be standardized. The ventilator in the standard care group will be set to volumetric mode with positive end-expiratory pressure according to the EXPRESS protocol. The measurement of extravascular lung water will be compared on day 2 between the TCAV settings group and the standard care settings group using the PICCO system. The TCAV setting is simple and inexpensive. In ARDS patients, the increase in injury-related pulmonary edema is a relevant marker of mortality, and its reduction could improve patients' outcomes. Our study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of these settings to justify a future large-scale, multicenter randomized trial.

The REALVENT trial is designed to evaluate whether a real-time, algorithm-driven ventilation feedback strategy can improve lung-protective ventilation (LPV) achievement rates in critically ill patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation. This multicentre randomised controlled trial will compare real-time respiratory waveform monitoring with automated feedback against standard ICU care. The primary endpoint is the LPV achievement rate over the first 72 hours.

The goal of this observational study is to establish a centralized ARDS biorepository of longitudinal biospecimens and harmonized clinical data, develop unsupervised, therapy-agnostic endotyping algorithms, and develop unsupervised, therapy-specific treatment-prediction algorithms over a 24 month period.

This study is a randomized, blank-controlled, open-label, single-dose, dose-escalation clinical study of rhKGF-2 in patients with ARDS. The trial is designed with three dose groups (5 mg, 10 mg, and 15 mg), which will be escalated sequentially from the lowest dose group to the highest dose group. Each dose group will enroll 8 subjects, randomized in a 6:2 ratio according to the order of enrollment, to receive either the corresponding dose of rhKGF-2 (6 subjects) or serve as a blank control (2 subjects). Each subject will receive a single dose, administered once via a disposable bronchoscopic catheter. All subjects will receive the trial intervention on top of standard ARDS treatment (see Concomitant Medications for details). Following the completion of drug administration, subjects will enter a 28-day follow-up period. Outcome measures include adverse events (AE), vital signs, laboratory parameters, oxygenation index (PFR), chest imaging changes, etc., to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of the treatment.

Acute Lung Injury (ALI) and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is a condition where high levels of inflammation damage the lung. This is a highly morbid condition with no specific pharmacologic therapies. The investigators posit that ARDS is caused due to an exaggerated activation of immune cells and that blockade of this activation may reduce lung damage/injury and help in ARDS management and possibly recovery. To test this hypothesis, the investigators propose to generate an in vitro immune cell model and test a novel (reactive oxygen species) blocking agent PIP-2 on this model. The investigating team will obtain blood of ARDS patients and isolate immune cells (specifically peripheral blood mononuclear cells or PBMC) and monitor the activation of these cells and their blockade by PIP-2. This is entirely an in vitro study.

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a major contributor to ICU mortality and is characterised by hypoxaemia and pulmonary oedema. Pathomechanisms include barrier breakdown, immunopathology, haemostatic derailment and dysbiosis; however, the actual sequence of events and how they cumulatively lead to lung failure remains unclear. Although ARDS is frequently triggered by pneumonia, it can also occur as a result of trauma, aspiration or non-pulmonary causes. Importantly, ARDS is highly heterogeneous; growing evidence points to aetiology-specific pathomechanisms - a circumstance that explains why attempts to develop specific drugs or timely diagnostic markers have so far failed. A comprehensive analysis of key microenvironmental and haemostasis-related parameters of the lung, combined with multidimensional quantitative image features derived from chest CT scans (radiomics), will enable us to i) identify ARDS phenotypes with different biological characteristics and ii) generate new hypotheses regarding aetiology- or subgroup-specific mechanisms, molecular markers and therapeutic options. Our approach is based on ICU management of our patients guided by bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF). Together with previously sampled cases and new samples collected as part of this study, our cohort will consist of patients with i) COVID-19-associated ARDS, ii) ARDS associated with other viral pneumonia, iii) ARDS associated with bacterial pneumonia, and iv) ARDS of non-pulmonary origin. Bacterial and fungal co-infections and superinfections are recorded in all patients and taken into account in the stratification. Patients with pneumonia without ARDS, as well as ventilated patients without underlying lung disease, serve as controls. To characterise the microbial lung microenvironment, the investigators combine data from routine microbiological diagnostics with microbiome sequencing and metabolomics. In addition, the investigators conduct comprehensive and longitudinal immune and haemostatic profiling by regularly analysing immune cells, cytokines and parameters of immune thrombosis in BALF and blood. Multi-omics integration then identifies phenotypic subgroups by merging all multimodal datasets - including radiomics. Selected samples from identified clusters are then further characterised using single-cell sequencing to uncover specific features/markers and pathomechanisms of the respective ARDS subtypes. Although it is clear that the pathogenesis of ARDS is multifactorial, comprehensive studies that integrate all relevant parameters are rare. Radiomics is increasingly recognised as a powerful tool for capturing the clinical status of ARDS in detail; however, to date, this imaging data has not been systematically linked to other omics readouts. The investigators aim to bridging this gap by conducting a thorough investigation across various ARDS aetiologies in the present study, incorporating all identifiable key factors. Our interdisciplinary team comprises basic immunologists, infectious disease and computational biologists, as well as clinicians with expertise in ARDS, infectious diseases, immunothrombosis and radiology.

Patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome are placed on mechanical ventilation, and the adjustment of ventilator parameters is an important step in their care, in particular positive expiratory pressure, applied at the end of breathing. The goal of this study is to learn if continuous anterior chest compression works as well as electrical impedance tomography for positive expiratory pressure titration. Researchers will compare the two methods for each patient, in a randomly determined order : continuous anterior chest compression and electrical impedance tomography. Participants will : * have a pep titration with both techniques * be included in the study for 28 days

This study aimed to quantitatively evaluate the immediate effect of inhaled nitric oxide on the ventilation / perfusion ratio in ARDS patients receiving nasal high flow oxygen therapy or noninvasive ventilation using electrical impedance tomography.

This Phase 1/2A, randomized, double-blind study will evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of HT31-1 (hCitH3-mAb) in healthy adult volunteers and in patients with mild-to-moderate acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to an infectious source. The current trial (Part A) focuses on single ascending doses (SAD) in healthy volunteers to characterize the safety profile, PK parameters, and immunogenicity of HT31-1. Emerging data from this phase will inform dose selection for the subsequent Part B study in ARDS patients and help establish the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D). Additionally, exploratory pharmacodynamic and biomarker assessments will be performed to evaluate target engagement and potential early biological activity.

Acute respiratory syndrome distress (ARDS) is a clinical common syndrome with high mortality. Mechanical ventilation (MV) is the cornerstone of management of ARDS but can lead to ventilator-induced lung injury. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), as one of main component of MV, has been widely used in the clinical practice. However, the PEEP selection is still a difficult problem for moderate to severe ARDS patients. EIT, an imaging tool evaluating the regional ventilation distribution at the bedside, can achieve the individual PEEP selection for all mechanically ventilated patients. Our previous study found that moderate to severe ARDS patients with higher recruitability could benefit from EIT-guided PEEP. This article compared the effect of PEEP titrated guided by EIT with fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2)-PEEP table on the clinical outcomes in ARDS patients.

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is characterized by severe hypoxemia and diffuse alveolar collapse, often requiring invasive mechanical ventilation. Non-individualized mechanical ventilation settings can cause ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) prevents alveolar collapse, but its effect varies among individuals. The recruitment-to-inflation (R/I) ratio evaluates bedside lung recruitment potential. This pilot study aims to compare two individualized PEEP titration strategies-one guided by the best static respiratory compliance and another guided by transpulmonary pressure via an esophageal balloon-and evaluate how baseline lung recruitment potential alters the early physiological responses to these interventions. Both strategies are preceded by an identical, standardized pressure-controlled initial lung recruitment maneuver to establish a baseline recruitment state.

Current clinical guidelines, such as those from the Surviving Sepsis Campaign and ARDSNet, recommend short-term NMBA use for patients with moderate to severe ARDS who exhibit persistent ventilator dyssynchrony or high plateau pressures despite deep sedation . However, they do not provide clear recommendations regarding the mode of administration. As a result, clinicians are left to extrapolate from limited or indirect evidence, which may lead to practice variation, uncertainty, and suboptimal care. This pilot randomized controlled trial is designed to directly address this critical gap by comparing intermittent bolus administration versus continuous infusion of NMBAs in a pragmatic, real-world ICU setting. The study will assess feasibility metrics necessary to plan a definitive trial and generate preliminary clinical data on safety and effectiveness. By clarifying the comparative benefits and risks of each approach, the results may influence practice guidelines, reduce variation in care, and improve patient outcomes and reduce practice variation.patient outcomes, optimize resource use, and inform future guidelines on the management of moderate to severe ARDS.

The goal of this platform trial is to determine the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of various interventions in patients with acute cardiorespiratory failure requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) The main question the platform trial aims to address is to determine the effect of a range of interventions on survival, organ support and resource utilisation to day 28 for hospitalised patients receiving ECMO. Researchers will compare various interventions within multiple platform trial domains to see if the interventions have effects on survival, organ support and resource utilisation for the patient cohort. Participants will be enrolled in accordance with the platform trial's domain structure to answer the research questions.

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is a serious condition where the lungs become inflamed, leading to severe breathing difficulties. Despite advances in medical care, ARDS remains a life-threatening illness with a high risk of death and long-term complications. One way doctors help ARDS patients is by using special ventilation techniques to protect the lungs from further damage. However, this often requires heavy sedation or even paralyzing medications, which can lead to other problems like delirium, muscle weakness, and longer hospital stays. Allowing patients to breathe on their own might offer benefits, but it also comes with risks. Many ARDS patients have a very strong urge to breathe, which can cause them to overexert their lungs, potentially leading to additional lung damage, known as patient selfinflicted lung injury (P-SILI). Our early research suggests that a medication called ondansetron, commonly used to prevent nausea, might help reduce this strong breathing drive in ARDS patients, possibly preventing further lung injury. The OSIRIS research program is designed to explore whether ondansetron can protect ARDS patients from P-SILI, ultimately improving their chances of survival and reducing long-term complications. The first part of this program, OSIRIS-1, is a small pilot study where we will test the feasibility of running a larger, more definitive trial. We will randomly assign ARDS patients to receive either ondansetron or a placebo, given intravenously four times a day, and monitor their heart rhythms closely to ensure safety. We will also track how well patients stick to the study plan and whether ondansetron helps reduce their breathing drive and lung strain. If successful, this research could lead to new ways of treating ARDS that rely less on heavy sedation, potentially improving outcomes for these critically ill patients and setting the stage for larger, more comprehensive studies in the future.

This is a Phase 2 multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study that will evaluate the safety and efficacy of host-directed therapeutics in hospitalized adults diagnosed with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) utilizing a platform trial design. Cohort A: Participants will be randomized to receive either a placebo or vilobelimab. This record describes the default procedures and analyses for Cohort A. Please see NCT06703073 for information on the BP-ARDS-P2-001 Master Protocol.

This is a Phase 2 multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study that will evaluate the safety and efficacy of host-directed therapeutics in hospitalized adults diagnosed with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) utilizing a platform trial design. Cohort B: Participants will be randomized to receive either a placebo or paridiprubart. This record describes the default procedures and analyses for Cohort B. Please see NCT06703073 for information on the BP-ARDS-P2-001 Master Protocol.

This is a Phase 2 multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study that will evaluate the safety and efficacy of host-directed therapeutics in hospitalized adults diagnosed with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) utilizing a platform trial design. Participants will be randomized to receive either a placebo or one of the active treatments. This record describes the default procedures and analyses for all cohorts. Each specific cohort may have additional eligibility requirements, safety and efficacy procedures, or endpoints, which will be described in the corresponding intervention-specific records on clinicaltrials.gov listed below in the detailed description.

This is a Phase 2 multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study that will evaluate the safety and efficacy of host-directed therapeutics in hospitalized adults diagnosed with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) utilizing a platform trial design. Cohort C: Participants will be randomized to receive either a placebo or bevacizumab. This record describes the default procedures and analyses for Cohort C. Please see NCT06703073 for information on the BP-ARDS-P2-001 Master Protocol.

To investigate global and regional changes in lung ventilation and perfusion induced by prone position in ARDS patients assessed by 3D-EIT. And to investigate the difference between 2D-EIT and 3D-EIT in prone position monitoring.

The project's main goal is to collect baseline clinical and procedural data as well as to assess clinical outcomes for all patients undergoing VV, VA or VAV ECMO implantation in the French West Indies and Guiana. All patients undergoing ECMO implantation will be prospectively registered.

Although the theoretical model of "cyclic on-off switching of pulmonary blood flow" provides a crucial perspective for understanding VILI, its clinical validation and real-time intervention face significant obstacles. The fundamental reason lies in the lack of pulmonary microcirculation monitoring technology capable of bedside, non-invasive, continuous operation with sufficient spatiotemporal resolution. Nowadays, a novel 3D-EIT can perform real-time and non-invasive assessment of the distribution of pulmonary blood flow. However, if 3D-EIT can help to identify "cyclic on-off switching of pulmonary blood flow" is still unclear.

The goal of this multi-center randomized controlled clinical trial is to learn if an individualized, bedside electrical impedance tomography (EIT)-guided ventilation strategy (including EIT-guided prone positioning and PEEP titration) can improve outcomes compared with a conventional lung-protective ventilation strategy in adult patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The main questions it aims to answer are: Does the individualized EIT-guided ventilation strategy reduce 28-day mortality in ARDS patients? Researchers will compare the EIT-guided intervention arm to a control arm receiving routine lung-protective ventilation (without bedside EIT guidance) to see if the EIT-guided approach lowers 28-day mortality and improves other clinical outcomes. Adult ARDS patients who meet inclusion criteria will be assigned to EIT-guided group and control group through stratified randomization: EIT-guided group: Undergo bedside EIT assessments using a China-manufactured EIT device to guide decisions about prone positioning and individualized PEEP titration (including a recruitment maneuver). Control group: Receive PEEP setting per conventional PEEP-FiO₂ tables and prone positioning per standard clinical indications without EIT guidance. Both groups: Receive standard supportive ICU care and routine outcome assessments at multiple time points. Primary outcome: 28-day mortality. Other outcomes include ventilator-free days to day 28 and so on.

Sepsis-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is one of the deadliest and most biologically heterogeneous forms of respiratory failure. Despite uniform diagnostic criteria, patients with septic ARDS show wide variability in inflammatory intensity, alveolar epithelial and endothelial injury, alveolar fluid composition, ventilatory mechanical properties, and clinical evolution. Early identification of these differences may enable better prognostication and more precise treatment. This prospective observational study aims to deeply characterize the earliest phases of septic ARDS by integrating serial bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) at 0, 24 and 72 hours with parallel plasma biomarker profiling and detailed mechanical ventilation data. This design captures the evolving biological and physiological landscape of septic ARDS during its most dynamic window. The central goal is to identify systemic, alveolar, and hybrid bio-mechano-inflammatory subphenotypes that can inform personalized approaches to support, risk stratification, and future interventional trials.

In its most severe form, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) may require the use of veno-venous ECMO (vvECMO). While the criteria for vvECMO indication, ECMO settings, and ventilator management are relatively well-defined after the publication of the EOLIA trial and subsequent national or international guidelines, few studies have assessed the criteria and methods for weaning from vvECMO. Besides, advances in the understanding of the pathophysiology of mechanical ventilation (MV) weaning process have led to the development of specific monitoring tools for this phase. Schematically, respiratory drive can be evaluated via the ventilator by measuring the pressure generated during a 100-millisecond expiratory occlusion (P0.1) and respiratory efforts through the measurement of esophageal pressure variation (delta Poeso). Recent retrospective studies conducted on COVID-19 ARDS patients supported by vvECMO suggest a longer duration of mechanical ventilation for patients whose weaning and decannulation process was "forced," i.e., performed under conditions of significant respiratory drive and effort. High values of P0.1 and delta Poeso were associated with prolonged MV duration. Self-inflicted lung injury (P-SILI) and elevated transpulmonary pressure related to these uncontrolled respiratory efforts likely explain the negative impact on MV duration. Therefore, this randomized study proposes to assess these monitoring tools, which are regularly used in clinical practice, to guide vvECMO weaning and decannulation decisions.

The goal of this interventional study is to evaluate the effect of different positive end-expiratory pressures (PEEP) on lung and diaphragm function in patients mechanically ventilated with pressure support ventilation in the intensive care unit. The main questions aim to answer: Does higher PEEP level affect diaphragm contractions and ventilatory efficiency? Does higher PEEP level limit inspiratory efforts? Does higher PEEP level affect lung compliance? The participants will be subjected to three different PEEP levels during pressure support ventilation: Low PEEP (4 cmH2O), Medium PEEP (10 cmH2O), High PEEP (16 cmH2O). The lung and diaphragm function will be evaluated using high-resolution esophageal manometry, electrical activity of the diaphragm, external diaphragm ultrasound and spirometric ventilator data.