Spinal Versus General Anesthesia in Pregnancies With Placenta Accreta Spectrum: A Retrospective Comparative Study

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexFemale
Age18-45
SponsorGaziantep City Hospital

About this trial

Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) is a serious pregnancy complication in which the placenta grows abnormally into the uterine wall. This condition is associated with a high risk of severe bleeding, need for blood transfusion, hysterectomy, and maternal complications during cesarean delivery.

This study aims to compare spinal anesthesia and general anesthesia in pregnant women diagnosed with placenta accreta spectrum who underwent cesarean delivery. The researchers reviewed existing medical records to evaluate differences in maternal and neonatal outcomes between the two anesthesia approaches.

The primary outcomes include changes in hemoglobin levels before and after surgery, the need for uterotonic medications during and after the operation, and newborn Apgar scores. Because this is a retrospective observational study, no new treatments were given, and all data were collected from routine clinical care records.

The findings are expected to help guide anesthetic decision-making in PAS cases, improve maternal and neonatal safety, and contribute to the international scientific literature on this topic.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Pregnant patients diagnosed with placenta accreta spectrum (PAS), Undergoing elective cesarean delivery, Receiving either spinal anesthesia or general anesthesia during cesarean section, Singleton pregnancy, Availability of complete medical and anesthesia records related to surgery and perioperative management

Disqualifiers

None

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • spinal anesthesia
  • General Anesthesia

Treatment groups

50 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups

Locations

This trial has no locations

Sponsors and collaborators