About this trial
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in its moderate to severe forms is associated with high mortality. Mechanical ventilation (MV) remains the cornerstone of ARDS management but carries a significant risk of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), a fundamental component of MV, is widely utilized in clinical practice; however, optimal PEEP selection for patients with moderate to severe ARDS remains a complex and unresolved challenge. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT), a bedside imaging modality that evaluates regional ventilation distribution, offers a means of individualizing PEEP settings in mechanically ventilated patients. By balancing the competing risks of alveolar overdistension and collapse, EIT facilitates precision in PEEP titration. This study compares the impact of EIT-guided PEEP selection versus the conventional low FiO2-PEEP table on blood oxygenation and pulmonary mechanics.
Eligibility criteria
Qualifiers
Age ≥ 18 years.
Intubated moderate and severe ARDS according to the New Global Definition (PaO2/FiO2 ≤200 mmHg).
Used continuous sedation with or without paralysis.
Disqualifiers
Presence of pneumothorax that is either undrained or newly occurred.
Unstable hemodynamics with a mean arterial pressure < 60 mmHg and unresponsive to resuscitation measures, and/or heart rate < 60 bpm.
Contraindications for EIT (pacemakers, automatic external defibrillators, cases of chest trauma or recent chest surgery limiting EIT belt application).
Pregnancy.
Trial design
Treatments tested in this trial
- electrical impedance tomography
- Non-EIT
Treatment groups
Sponsors and collaborators
Vietnam Military Medical University
Lead sponsor
Hanoi Medical University
Collaborator
Bach Mai Hospital
Collaborator