Acute Respiratory Syndrome Distress

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains a serious and often fatal complication in patients following severe trauma or major surgery. Mechanical ventilation is essential for supportive care in this population, but may aggravate lung injury when suboptimal ventilatory settings are applied. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is crucial for maintaining alveolar recruitment; however, optimal PEEP selection in trauma- or postoperative-associated ARDS remains uncertain. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) enables bedside, real-time assessment of regional ventilation and may support optimal PEEP titration by balancing alveolar overdistension and collapse. This study compares EIT-guided PEEP optimization with the conventional low FiO₂-PEEP strategy in terms of oxygenation and respiratory mechanics in patients with moderate to severe ARDS following trauma or surgery.

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in its moderate to severe forms is associated with high mortality. Mechanical ventilation (MV) remains the cornerstone of ARDS management but carries a significant risk of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), a fundamental component of MV, is widely utilized in clinical practice; however, optimal PEEP selection for patients with moderate to severe ARDS remains a complex and unresolved challenge. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT), a bedside imaging modality that evaluates regional ventilation distribution, offers a means of individualizing PEEP settings in mechanically ventilated patients. By balancing the competing risks of alveolar overdistension and collapse, EIT facilitates precision in PEEP titration. This study compares the impact of EIT-guided PEEP selection versus the conventional low FiO2-PEEP table on blood oxygenation and pulmonary mechanics.