Ultrasound Guided Midline vs Landmark Paramedian Continous Spinal Anesthesia in the Elderly

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age65+
SponsorUniversity Tunis El Manar

About this trial

Former clinical studies have reported the superiority of the landmark guided paramedian approach above the classical landmark guided midline approach for the continuous spinal anesthesia especially in the elderly. On the other hand, more recent clinical trials have suggested that the use of ultrasound to guide spinal anesthesia will be safer and more effective than the conventional palpation-guided technique.

The aim of this study will be to compare the conventional "blind" landmark paramedian approach to the ultrasound "modern" guided midline approach for the continuous spinal anesthesia in the elderly with hip fractures.

Patients will randomly divided into two groups:

Group(PML): will undergo conventional landmark guided paramedian continuous spinal anesthesia Group (MUS): will undergo ultrasound guided midline continuous spinal anesthesia

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

all consented patients aged over 65 years old scheduled to undergo surgery for hip fracture under continuous spinal anesthesia with American Society of Anesthesiologists ASA physical status classification from I to III

Disqualifiers

contraindications to spinal anesthesia ( allergy to local anesthetic, coagulopathy, infection at the site of injection)

previous history of lumbar spine surgery

per operative severe complication with conversion to general anesthesia

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • conventional landmark paramedian technique
  • preprocedural ultrasound guided midline technique

Treatment groups

110 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups

Sponsors and collaborators