Achilles Tendon Rupture

This prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial evaluates the clinical efficacy of collagen scaffold augmentation in surgical repair for acute Achilles tendon ruptures. The study will enroll 48 adult participants randomly assigned to either the intervention group (surgical repair with collagen scaffold augmentation) or the control group (standard surgical repair without scaffold). The primary outcome is tendon function assessed using the VISA-A score, while secondary outcomes include tendon healing characteristics measured by ultrasound (thickness, neovascularity), calf muscle strength, ankle range of motion, and complication rates. Follow-up assessments will be conducted at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months post-surgery. The study aims to determine whether collagen scaffold augmentation enhances tendon healing and functional recovery compared to conventional repair methods, potentially offering a improved treatment approach for Achilles tendon injuries.

The Achilles tendon exhibits high tensile strength and can withstand extremely high loads. However, it is susceptible to injuries such as tendinopathies and ruptures, which are associated with structural alterations and loss of function. Strategies have been investigated to enhance clinical rehabilitation. Nevertheless, the effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation on pain and functional improvement, as well as the optimal dosing parameters for the rehabilitation of Achilles tendon injuries, remain inconclusive. The aim of this study is to compare the immediate effects of two electrical stimulation protocols on pain, functional performance, peripheral oxygen extraction, and maximal tendon displacement during a single leg heel rise functional task in patients with Achilles tendinopathy and/or a history of Achilles tendon rupture. In addition, this study aims to characterize Achilles tendon structural properties and ankle plantarflexor muscle strength in this population.

The Achilles tendon is the strongest and largest tendon in the human body, playing a critical role in plantarflexion and facilitating activities such as walking, running, and jumping. However, it is also the most frequently ruptured tendon. The injury and associated disability have a significant impact on patient quality of life and healthcare services. Achilles tendon ruptures are increasingly common, particularly among middle-aged recreational athletes, with an incidence estimated at 18 per 100,000 person-years. The Swansea Morriston Achilles Rupture Treatment (SMART) protocol represents a structured, progressive approach to non-operative rehabilitation. It emphasizes early mobilization, protected weight-bearing, and a gradual return to sport or high-level function through targeted strength and neuromuscular training. While short-term outcomes of non-surgical protocols have demonstrated promising results, there remains limited high-quality data on long-term isokinetic strength and patient-reported functional outcomes beyond six months in this patient group. This study aims to evaluate isokinetic plantarflexor strength and self-reported functional outcomes at 12 months following non-surgical management of Achilles tendon ruptures using the SMART rehabilitation protocol. By assessing both objective and subjective recovery metrics, we aim to contribute to the growing evidence base for evidence-informed, conservative Achilles tendon rehabilitation. A secondary aim of the study is to examine the relationship between isokinetic strength scores and self reported functional recovery scores using the ATRS questionnaire. Participants will attend one 60-90 minute visit to complete a short questionnaire and perform a safe, clinic-based ankle strength test using an isokinetic machine; the test feels like pushing against a footplate, similar to resisted ankle movements. The results of these tests will be collected and analysed. The study will help to gain further insight into patient recovery from this injury.

Among the injuries that affect the Achilles tendon, rupture is one of the most frequent. This injury can generate functional, neuromuscular, and tendon deficits that can last for long periods or even be permanent. In the long term (i.e., more than a year after the injury), individuals present functional impairments related to the lower limb, deficits in the capacity to produce muscle force, as well as higher levels of muscle activation (as a compensatory response). Such changes may be due to injury adaptations in the plantar flexor muscles' architecture, which may have shorter, more pennate fibers, leading to reduced muscle thickness. Furthermore, the Achilles tendon may be elongated, with a greater cross-sectional area, presenting lower stiffness and quality (i.e., lower Young's modulus). Strength training can play an important role in recovering from Achilles tendon ruptures, as it promotes functional, neuromuscular, and tendon adaptations that can minimize deficits caused by the injury. However, there is a gap in the literature regarding strength training, as well as the dose vs response relationship, regarding functional, neuromuscular, and tendon adaptations after Achilles tendon rupture. Thus, the aim of the present study is to compare the effects of a strength training program of different intensities on plantar flexors' functional, neuromuscular, and tendon outcomes after Achilles tendon rupture. Men aged between 20 and 50 years old who suffered a total unilateral rupture of the Achilles tendon between one and five years after the rupture will be included in the study, as well as healthy men who did not suffer the rupture (control group). Participants who have suffered an Achilles tendon rupture will undergo a progressive lower limb strength training program twice a week for a total duration of 12 weeks, which will be randomized between two groups: low intensity (G55 - 55% of 1-RM) and moderate intensity (G70 - 70% of 1-RM). The following outcomes will be evaluated: a) Achilles tendon's morphological (length and cross-sectional area), mechanical (force-elongation relationship and stiffness) and material (stress-strain relationship and Young's modulus) properties; b) triceps surae muscles' morphological (architecture \[fascicle length, pennation angle and thickness\] and quality \[measured by echointensity and specific tension\]) properties; c) ankle functionality (maximum height in the heel raise test); d) the plantar flexors' force production capacity (peak and rate of torque development in different joint positions); e) the plantar flexors' muscle voluntary activation; and f) triceps suraes' neuromuscular capacity (i.e., recruitment curves). Assessments will be performed at two times (pre-training; and after 12 weeks of training \[post-12\]) through functional tests, ultrasound techniques, isokinetic dynamometry, electromyography, and percutaneous electrical stimulation. An intraclass correlation coefficient will be used to verify the test-retest reproducibility of ultrasound measurements. The Chi-Square test will be used to compare the level of physical activity (pre-training) between the groups. The results of the intervention will be expressed using descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, and standard error). The normality and sphericity of the data will be tested using the Shapiro-Wilk and Mauchly tests, respectively. A generalized estimating equation, followed by Bonferroni post-hoc, will be used to compare the effects of groups (G55 and G70) and times (pre-training, Post-6, and Post-12). A one-way ANOVA, followed by a Bonferroni post-hoc, will be used to compare the control group participants' limbs with the healthy and injured limbs from both intervention groups (G55 and G70) in the Pre and Post-12 times. The effect size will be estimated for each outcome. All statistical analyzes will be performed using SPSS software.

The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate whether rehabilitation with blood flow restriction (BFR) offers added value compared to conventional rehabilitation in patients undergoing surgical repair for Achilles tendon rupture. The study will include adult patients of all sexes who have undergone surgical treatment at two selected hospitals. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does BFR-enhanced rehabilitation improve functional recovery compared to conventional rehabilitation? What are the effects of BFR on muscle strength and tendon recovery? Researchers will compare blood flow restriction (BFR) therapy with conventional rehabilitation to determine whether BFR leads to improved clinical, muscular, and tendon-related outcomes. Participants will: 1. Undergo standard surgical repair of the Achilles tendon 2. Be randomly assigned to a 24-week exercise therapy program-either with or without blood flow restriction (BFR)-starting four weeks post-surgery 3. Take part in follow-up assessments at weeks 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, and 52, which will include: * Questionnaires on pain, quality of life, fear of movement, and return to sport * Medical imaging techniques such as ultrasound, MRI, shear wave elastography, and power Doppler * Muscle strength testing * Blood sample collection, along with a tendon tissue sample taken during surgery

The purpose of this study is to determine if blood flow restriction therapy after Achilles tendon rupture reconstruction decreases post-operative calf atrophy, improves reported outcomes, and ultimately decreases return to play time.

The goal of this clinical trial is to gain insights into the effects of Blood Flow Restriction Exercise (BFRE) in patients with an acute Achilles tendon Rupture. The main questions it aims to answer are: Is BFRE an effective adjunct to usual care when compared with only usual care? When is the optimal timing for initiating BFRE: In the early treatment stage or at the later stage after hospital treatment? Participants will receive an intervention comprising 12 weeks of BFRE as an adjunct to usual care. * Either in the initial 1-12 weeks after Achilles tendon rupture, or * In the following 13-24 weeks after Achilles tendon rupture Researchers will compare the two groups at 13 weeks (3 months) to compare BFRE to usual care, and at 25 weeks (6 months) to compare the two time points for initiating BFRE (early vs. late).

The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate a new surgical approach to restore the anatomy of a ruptured Achilles tendon. We will use a new two-layer technique followed by rehabilitation and find out how it influence the patients clinical outcome, muscle and tendon structure, and function after one year and compare with a standard non-surgical approach followed by rehabilitation. Participants will be randomized to 1) NEWSUR: A new two-layer surgical technique followed by rehabilitation regime or 2) CONSER: A standard non-surgical treatment followed by rehabilitation . We hypothesize that restoring the anatomy of the ruptured mid-substance Achilles tendon using a new two-layer surgery technique followed by rehabilitation will yield a more favorable patient reported outcome (ATRS) one year after rupture compared to standard non-surgical treatment followed by rehabilitation.

This study aims to compare the functional outcome of Isolated Flexor hallucis longus tendon transfer and Gastrocnemius Augmented Flexor hallucis longus tendon transfer in repair of Achilles tendon defects. Also, compare the two procedures regarding complication rate, time to restore the function, and the need for secondary procedures.

Increased knowledge is needed about new methods how to treat patients with Achilles tendon ruptures (ATR). A goal is to be able to individualize as well as improve treatment beyond the question about if surgery should be used or not. An overall aim of the project is to, in a randomized controlled trial (RCT), explore what impact a new treatment method with Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) - attached on the patients ́ calf muscles on the injured leg - in the early stages after an ATR, may have on tendon length, functional performance, biomechanical variables and patient reported outcome, both in the short and long term after the injury. 70 patients are planned to be included in this RCT and will be evaluated 3,6 and 12 months after their injury. Primary outcome will be heel-rise height. Secondary outcome will be tendon length, jumping ability, patient- reported outcome and biomechanical loading pattern. There is also a need to explore if the patients ́ loading patterns improve after treatment with NMES. Therefore, biomechanical variables in lower leg during walking and jumping will also be evaluated one year after their injury. The planned studies include completely new ways of exploring how to optimize the rehabilitation after an ATR. Since there might be an increased risk for overuse injuries in the healthy limb, there will also be focus on how the non- injured limb may be affected of an ATR. Taken together, this new knowledge can be helpful in the clinical setting to individualize and optimize patients' treatment and rehabilitation with the goal to guide the patient return to the same, or higher level of, physical activity as before the injury.