Carotid Occlusion

Revascularization for carotid artery occlusion (CAO) remained controversial, there is no prospective randomized control trial (RCT) regarding carotid artery stenting (CAS) in CAO patients. The investigators conduct a prospective study composed of clinical registry arm and RCT arm. The main purpose of the study is investigate neurocognitive function at 3 months and thereafter up to 12 months.

Rationale: Approximately 20% of the patients with acute ischemic stroke due to an intracranial large vessel occlusion (LVO) has a high-grade stenosis in the ipsilateral cervical carotid artery. It is uncertain whether immediate carotid artery stenting (CAS) of a cervical carotid artery stenosis during endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is beneficial. Immediate CAS could improve cerebral perfusion and prevent recurrent ischemic stroke but could also increase the chance of intracranial hemorrhagic complications due to hyperperfusion syndrome or to the required antiplatelet treatment to prevent stent occlusion. Moreover, some patients end up with a severe disabling stroke after EVT. In these patients carotid revascularization by carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or CAS would usually not be performed but these patients would be treated by medical management only. Objective: to assess the safety and efficacy of immediate cervical CAS during EVT in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to LVO with a high-grade stenosis \>50% or occlusion of the ipsilateral cervical carotid artery. Study design: prospective randomized open label controlled trial comparing immediate CAS during EVT versus EVT with deferred treatment of the cervical carotid artery lesion (deferred CAS/CEA or medical management alone). Outcome assessment will be blinded for treatment allocation.