Extubation Failure

DIVA is a pragmatic randomized clinical trial (RCT) to determine: among (P) preterm infants born 23 0/7-28 6/7 weeks gestation undergoing extubation from mechanical ventilation, whether (I) Non-invasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NIV-NAVA) (C) compared with Non-synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NS-NIPPV), will reduce the incidence of (O) extubation failure within (T) 5 days (120 hours) of extubation.

This prospective, non-interventional observational study will evaluate the risk of reintubation in adult postoperative patients admitted to the intensive care unit after major surgery. Reintubation after extubation is an important clinical problem because it may increase complications, prolong mechanical ventilation, and extend intensive care and hospital stay. The study will include adult patients who are extubated in the operating room and admitted to the intensive care unit with spontaneous breathing. Within the first hours after ICU admission, bedside ultrasound measurements of diaphragm thickness, parasternal intercostal muscle thickness, and lung ultrasound score will be performed. The ROX index will also be calculated using oxygen saturation, inspired oxygen concentration, and respiratory rate. Perioperative fluid balance will be recorded from anesthesia and patient files. Patients will be followed for 48 to 72 hours after ICU admission to determine whether reintubation is required. The study aims to assess whether respiratory muscle ultrasound findings, lung ultrasound score, ROX index, and perioperative fluid balance can help predict reintubation risk in postoperative ICU patients. No additional treatment or intervention will be applied as part of the study, and all clinical decisions will be made by the responsible intensive care team according to routine clinical practice.

Extubation failure, defined as the need for reintubation after planned removal of the endotracheal tube, occurs in up to 20% of critically ill patients and is associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation, longer intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and increased mortality. Current assessments of extubation readiness focus primarily on respiratory performance and do not routinely evaluate upper airway protective function. The Airway Protection for Extubation (APEX) score is a bedside assessment tool based on swallowing biomechanics designed to evaluate airway protection before extubation. In a pilot prospective cohort study, the APEX score demonstrated promising performance for identifying patients at increased risk of extubation failure. This prospective multicenter cohort study will be conducted across ICUs in Brazil to externally validate the APEX score in critically ill adults undergoing planned extubation. The study will evaluate the discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility of the APEX score for predicting extubation failure and will assess its performance across different patient populations and hospital settings. The results of this study may support the incorporation of a simple bedside assessment of swallowing biomechanics into extubation readiness evaluation and contribute to more individualized decision-making regarding extubation in critically ill patients.

This prospective observational study aims to evaluate the predictive value of the combined use of the rapid shallow breathing index, train-of-four ratio, and bispectral index for extubation success after general anesthesia. Adult patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia and planned for extubation in the operating room will be included. Before extubation, RSBI, TOF ratio, BIS value, respiratory parameters, and relevant perioperative data will be recorded. The decision to extubate will be made by the attending anesthesiologist according to routine clinical practice and will not be altered by the study protocol. Patients will be followed for 30 minutes after extubation to assess extubation success or the development of complications such as desaturation, laryngospasm, need for airway intervention, mask ventilation, or reintubation. The primary aim is to determine whether the combined RSBI, TOF, and BIS model predicts extubation success more accurately than each parameter alone.

Liberation from mechanical ventilation involves three steps: weaning, readiness assessment, and extubation. Readiness is determined using clinical criteria such as improvement of the underlying condition, hemodynamic stability, and adequate respiratory effort. Successful extubation is defined as not requiring invasive support within 48 hours. Due to the complexity of ICU patients, various clinical parameters and multi-component scores have been developed to predict extubation success. This study aims to develop and evaluate a multi-component score, the Readiness for EXtubation score (REXs), to predict extubation readiness in ICU patients under invasive mechanical ventilation.

This international, multicenter, observational study aims to describe rehabilitation practices in Intensive Care Units (ICUs) worldwide. The primary objective is to provide an overview of current rehabilitation strategies used in ICUs globally. Secondary objectives include assessing the relationship between rehabilitation and key ICU outcomes such as ICU and hospital mortality, length of stay, duration of invasive ventilation, extubation failures, and long-term outcomes including quality of life and functional performance 28 days post-ICU discharge. The study will also compare rehabilitation practices across different geographic and economic regions to identify potential disparities. The study is structured into three modules, with participation contingent on local resources and feasibility. The BASIC Module (mandatory for all centers) gathers fundamental data on rehabilitation practices and their association with patient outcomes. The EXTENDED Module (optional) collects more detailed information on the type, timing, duration, and safety of rehabilitation interventions, including passive exercises, active mobilization, respiratory therapies, dysphagia training, occupational therapy, and cognitive support. The EXTENDED FOLLOW-UP Module (optional) evaluates the patient's quality of life and functional recovery 28 days after ICU discharge. By examining global rehabilitation practices and their impact on patient outcomes, this study aims to improve rehabilitation strategies in ICUs, contributing to better patient care, recovery, and long-term health outcomes.

The purpose of this observational study is to learn about neonatologists' perceptions of extubation readiness and extubation and reintubation practices in extremely preterm infants in the first 2 weeks of life using prospective qualitative and quantitative data. Actual extubation readiness is defined as successful extubation, defined as no reintubation in the 7 days following extubation. Key research questions are: How do clinicians assess extubation readiness in this population? Does this assessment correlate with actual extubation success? What factors (reasons, clinical status, ventilatory parameters) are associated with extubation readiness? Patients born before 28 weeks gestational age and admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) within the first 24 hours are be included. The attending physician will complete a prospectively administered questionnaire with open-ended and multiple-choice questions to daily assess the decision and rationale for extubation or non-extubation of patients mechanically ventilated during the first 15 days of life. Patient characteristics, respiratory outcomes, and mortality will be recorded until the end of hospitalisation and/or definitive weaning from any ventilatory support or supplemental oxygen.

This is a randomized, open, multicenter, pragmatic, adaptive clinical trial with intention-to-treat analysis. The study will compare two weaning strategies from mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients admitted to intensive care units, with more than 72 hours of mechanical ventilation and with a successful spontaneous breathing trial on pressure support. Immediately after a successful spontaneous breathing trial, eligible patients will be randomized into 2 groups that will be treated according to one of the following interventions:1) One-hour positive pressure ventilation: as soon as the success of the spontaneous breathing trial is confirmed, the patient is submitted to mechanical ventilation for 1 hour using the previous ventilatory parameters and, afterwards, extubated.2) Immediate extubation: the patient is extubated immediately after the success of the spontaneous breathing trial.

This is a randomized, open, multicenter, pragmatic, adaptive clinical trial with intention-to-treat analysis. The study will compare two weaning strategies from mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients admitted to intensive care units, with more than 72 hours of mechanical ventilation and with a successful spontaneous breathing trial on T-piece. Immediately after a successful spontaneous breathing trial, eligible patients will be randomized into 2 groups that will be treated according to one of the following interventions: 1. One-hour positive pressure ventilation: as soon as the success of the spontaneous breathing trial is confirmed, the patient is submitted to mechanical ventilation for 1 hour using the previous ventilatory parameters and, afterwards, extubated. 2. Immediate extubation: the patient is extubated immediately after the success of the spontaneous breathing trial.

subjects on mechanical ventilator who are about to be extubated to Non invasive ventilation because the physician thinks they are high risk for failure will be approached and consented for our study. Once randomized they will either be on the standard of care Non invasive arm or the intervention arm which would mean they are placed on the Biphasic cuirass ventilation.

Around 20% of the obese patients with higher body mass index (BMI) who are taken off the breathing tube and breathing machine (ventilator) end up needing it back to support breathing. The re-application of breathing tube is associated with poor outcomes, including high risk of pneumonia, longer hospital stays, and death. The purpose of this study is to assess if prophylactic use of noninvasive breathing support after removing the breathing tube lowers the chance of needing the breathing tube again.

Up to 20% of MV patients experience EF \[10\]. EF is defined as the need to reinsert the endotracheal tube to resume MV in patients extubated for less than 48 hours. It has high rates of morbidity and mortality, prolongs the duration of MV and thus causes a longer stay in the PICU and risk of complications such as the need for tracheostomy, the incidence of pneumonia and pulmonary damage, and finally, costs increase as well and death \[10, 11\] .