Implant Therapy

2

Review clinical trials related to Implant Therapy. Use filters to narrow results by trial status, phase, treatment, biological sex and sponsor.

Condition / disease
Location
Status: Not yet recruiting

Do Immediate Digital Workflows Increase Patient Value?

This two-center randomized controlled trial will evaluate whether an immediate digital posterior implant workflow provides greater patient-defined value than a delayed digital workflow in adults requiring single posterior implant rehabilitation. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to immediate implant placement at the time of tooth extraction or to delayed implant placement after approximately 16 weeks of healing following extraction and ridge preservation as indicated. The primary endpoint is oral health-related quality of life assessed longitudinally using the OHIP-14 questionnaire and analyzed as the model-based mean score averaged across the active treatment phase from baseline through definitive crown delivery. Secondary outcomes include workflow-related patient experience, chairside time, number of visits, postoperative pain, buccal contour changes based on intraoral scan-derived volumetric analysis, radiographic marginal bone level changes, implant survival, clinical peri-implant parameters, technical complications, esthetic outcomes, accuracy of guided implant placement, and clinician-reported workflow outcomes.

Participants needed: 50
Trial details
Age: 18+Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: Heinrich-Heine University, DuesseldorfUpdated: Jun 18, 2026Locations: 2
Eligibility criteria

Adults aged 18 years or older. [+11]

• Known or suspected poor compliance, alcohol abuse, or substance abuse. [+8]

Status: Recruiting

Crestal Bone Changes Following Equi-crestal Versus Subcrestal Implant Placement

Statement of problem: The stability of peri-implant bone is a crucial factor for the long-term success of dental implants, where crestal bone plays a significant role in both the primary as well as the long- term implant stability. A bone loss of 1.5 mm during the first year of loading has been acceptable according to the early standards. However, more bone stability can be expected with the development in implant designs and surfaces over the past decades. Aim of the study: the aim of this study is to radiographically assess the crestal bone changes following delayed implant placement in mandibular previously augmented posterior sites, comparing cases with equicrestal implant placement with subcrestal implant placement

Participants needed: 28
Trial details
Age: 21-60Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: Misr International UniversityUpdated: Jan 27, 2026Locations: 1
Eligibility criteria

Patients older than 21 years. [+5]

Patients with inadequate bone volume and/ or quality [+5]