Intensive Care Medicine

The aim of this observational study is to test the IntelliLung decision support system based on artificial intelligence. This system is intended to help to set the ventilator. The study includes patients with and without ARDS (acute respiratory distress syndrome) who are receiving invasive mechanical ventilation, as well as patients with additional extracorporeal lung support. The study will be conducted in several centers. The main question of the study: How well do the mechanical ventilation settings of healthcare staff match the recommendations of the IntelliLung system?

ICU mortality indicates the severity of disease, healthcare quality, and the efficacy of interventions. The severity scores are tools to predict the risk of mortality in the ICU, and the APACHE II score is frequently used for this purpose. However, studies validating the score in Colombia are limited. There is uncertainty about the precision and discrimination capacity of the APACHE II score in a population that varies from the original, with varying diseases, and in a different timeline. The investigators determined to evaluate: 1. Evaluate the rate of mortality in the ICU by type of disease and type of admission. 2. The factors associated with mortality. 3. Validate the performance of the APACHE II score as a predictor of mortality.

The goal of this platform trial is to determine the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of various interventions in patients with acute cardiorespiratory failure requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) The main question the platform trial aims to address is to determine the effect of a range of interventions on survival, organ support and resource utilisation to day 28 for hospitalised patients receiving ECMO. Researchers will compare various interventions within multiple platform trial domains to see if the interventions have effects on survival, organ support and resource utilisation for the patient cohort. Participants will be enrolled in accordance with the platform trial's domain structure to answer the research questions.

Sedation (painkillers and sedative drugs) treats pain, reduces suffering, and helps patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) remain comfortable. ECMO is a life support machine that provides oxygen and removes waste gases (carbon dioxide) in very sick patients with severe heart or lung failure. About 300-400 patients per year receive ECMO in the UK. These patients are younger and generally more healthy compared to other critically ill patients. However patients that survive ECMO have long-term health problems. These include anxiety, memory problems, withdrawal from medicines, and mobility issues. These problems issues could all be related to the type and amount of sedation given. A sedation protocol is a way of guiding healthcare professionals how much sedation is given to patients in ICU. Too much sedation can cause confusion, hallucinations, excessive sleepiness, and longer time in hospital. Too little sedation can cause pain, distress, and also a longer time in hospital. Using a sedation protocol in non-ECMO patients has been shown to reduce these complications. However, there are no protocols for giving sedation to ECMO patients in research papers. The investigators know healthcare staff find it difficult to manage sedation, and higher amounts of sedation is given to ECMO patients. Aims: * To describe current sedation use in ECMO patients in the UK and compare to non-ECMO critically ill patients. * To develop a sedation protocol for ECMO patients with input from patients, their family, and staff. Design/methods: Study 1: The investigators will study how sedation is used in adult ECMO patients and compare with non-ECMO but critically ill patients in the UK. The investigators will collect information on drug doses and pain and sedation scores. The investigators will also ask ECMO centres if they use a sedation protocol to adjust sedation doses. This information will be helpful for the design of the protocol in study 2. Study 2: The investigators will design a sedation protocol with input from patients, family, and staff. The investigators will organise meetings to share experiences and agree on what to include in the protocol that is considered acceptable and safe. The investigators will then assess if the protocol is safe and acceptable with staff outside the co-design group. Patient and public involvement/engagement: The investigators received feedback from patients and family members which helped to design this proposal, the lay summary and what to measure in a trial. Patients and family members will continue to help with development of the sedation and trial protocol. They will advise how the investigators should review study findings, and support sharing of results to the public. Impact/dissemination: The investigators will share findings through social media, patient charities, research papers and conferences.

The purpose of this multi-site prospective study is to assess validity of a new step test called Functional-Incremental Stepping-in-place- Test (F-IST) compared to gold-standard cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) and to physical function and health perception, respectively. The investigators will also assess test-retest reliability of the F-IST. The investigators hypothesize that the F-IST will have high validity and test-retest reliability to be used in field testing environments such as the ICU.

This research is about whether treatment with a commonly used antibiotic can prevent infections in airway and lungs and improves the chance of surviving, if it is given soon after patients commence mechanical ventilation when they have been admitted to hospital with an acute severe brain injury. An acute severe brain injury can occur as a result of a stroke, a traumatic injury or due to lack of oxygen to the brain that happens as a result of a cardiac arrest. Patients who are unconscious after an acute severe brain injury often need assistance to breath adequately, and this assistance is given by a breathing tube, connected to a mechanical ventilator. This treatment is an emergency medical treatment. The breathing tube is inserted into the patients' airway by either their mouth or neck. For patients who need assistance with their breathing from a mechanical ventilator, infections in the airways and lungs, known as pneumonia, are a common complication. Everyone naturally has bacteria in their mouth, esophagus and stomach. Clinicians think that during the process of inserting the breathing tube, small amounts of these bacteria can be introduced into the airways and lung when people are unconscious following an acute severe brain injury, or during the process of placing the breathing tube into the airways. These bacteria are now in a place they aren't meant to be and can cause an infections in the airways and lungs known as pneumonia. The purpose of this research is to see if giving one dose of a common antibiotic can prevent patients developing pneumonia, which is associated with having a breathing tube inserted and being on a ventilator, improving the chance of recovery following the acute severe brain injury and ultimately improving the chance of surviving. When patients have a known infection, current guidelines are to treat them with antibiotics. Antibiotics work to kill the bacteria causing the infection. When a patient has an infection in their lungs, they often need to stay on the mechanical ventilator for longer. While current practice is to give patients with a proven infection in their airways and lungs (pneumonia) antibiotics, it is unknown if giving an antibiotic to patients to prevent these infections before they show signs of pneumonia may lead to better outcomes.

The ARREVE-3 trial will evaluate whether a structured palliative care protocol can improve end-of-life management for mechanically ventilated ICU patients in whom a decision to withdraw life-sustaining therapies has been made. This cluster-randomized controlled trial compares protocol-based care with usual practice across participating centers. The intervention includes comprehensive guidance on symptom management, sedation, nursing care, withdrawal procedures, and family support, supported by standardized staff training. The primary endpoint is adherence to recommended end-of-life practices, while secondary outcomes assess patient comfort, communication with relatives, and the impact on families and healthcare professionals

VoiceLove is a phone application allowing family and patients to share information in a secure platform. This project will compare the VoiceLove app to usual care to learn about whether VoiceLove improves patient-family communication, family engagement, and ICU delirium.

Ten years after our team's publication, practices have changed considerably in the management of severe cirrhotic patients. This study will analyse these practices in primary care hospitals and in a tertiary centre, and assess the impact of these changes on the prognosis of these patients. The following hypotheses will be tested: * Improvement in intensive care and overall prognosis compared with data from the literature prior to 2014 * Improved access to liver transplantation compared with the literature prior to 2014 * Improvement in intensive care unit practices (for example: application of recommendations published by learned societies concerning the intensive care unit management of patients with cirrhosis, access to comfort care, degree of clinical severity on admission to the intensive care unit, etc.). * Centre' effect: variability in the phenotype of patients admitted to intensive care depending on the technical facilities available and whether or not the hospital centre has access to TH.

Pressure injury (PI) is characterized as damage to the skin and/or underlying tissues resulting from sustained pressure or a combination of pressure and shear forces between the patient and the support surface. Prolonged pressure is a well-established risk factor in the development of PIs. Frequent repositioning and routine patient care have been recognized for decades as integral components of PI prevention and treatment protocols. The duration of interface pressure is as critical as its magnitude. When interface pressure exceeds the mean capillary blood pressure, blood flow can be compromised, leading to ischemia in affected areas, which may progress to necrosis if sustained over time. Furthermore, it is widely accepted in the literature that tissue becomes at risk when interface pressure exceeds 30 to 32 mmHg. In this context, continuous lateral rotation therapy (CLRT) offers a potential alternative for managing critically ill patients. CLRT involves continuous mechanical rotation of the patient in the lateral plane. However, its effects on skin integrity remain poorly understood. Despite the rationale behind and widespread recommendation of repositioning, the lack of robust evaluations on how repositioning impacts interface pressure creates uncertainty, underscoring the need for high-quality trials to assess different strategies for implementation. Although lateralization is a pragmatic strategy for preventing pressure injuries, its use in critically ill patients requires an integrated assessment of respiratory, hemodynamic, and gastroesophageal effects. Therefore, this study proposes an innovative approach by evaluating, for the first time, the effectiveness of automated postural change with simultaneous monitoring of tissue integrity, pulmonary function, cardiovascular stability, and gastroesophageal protection. The aim is to optimize pressure injury prevention, improve pulmonary mechanics, ensure hemodynamic stability, and preserve gastroesophageal safety in critically ill patients.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is frequent in patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). Pharmacologic prophylaxis is sometimes contraindicated, and mechanical prophylaxis is used. The primary objective of the study is to compare Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy (PEMF) with conventional mechanical prophylaxis for the prevention of VTE in patients in the ICU.

The goal of this study is to assess how safe it is for critically ill patients in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) to undergo a PET scan. A PET scan is a type of medical imaging used to help determine why a patient is sick. It is similar to a CT scan but involves a small amount of radioactivity to highlight areas of concern in the body. For a PET scan, patients need to be transported from the ICU to the scanning room, which can be risky because ICU patients are often very fragile. After a patient gets the PET scan injection, their body gives off a small amount of radiation for a short time. Because of this, doctors and nurses have to keep some distance to protect themselves. This means they keep an eye out for the patient from a bit further away than normal. This makes the procedure slightly riskier, especially for very sick patients. This study aims to answer the question: Is getting a PET scan riskier for ICU patients than a regular CT scan? All patients in this study will continue to receive their usual critical care. Researchers will closely monitor the scanning process to evaluate its safety. PET scans are already widely used to detect cancer, but new advancements may allow us to use them more often to diagnose infections. Before this can become routine practice, we need to ensure that PET scanning is just as safe as other commonly used imaging techniques. This study will assess all ICU patients undergoing a PET scan-regardless of the reason for the scan-to determine how safe the procedure is in critically ill individuals.

Reducing the quantity of morphinomimetics during the operative period reduces the prevalence and intensity of adverse effects. However, morphinomimetics are indispensable during surgery, as they limit the autonomic nervous system's deleterious reactions to nociception. The administration of these drugs in intravenous boluses during surgery is usually guided by their duration of action and by variations in heart rate and blood pressure. Other events, such as hypovolemia or extreme surgical position, may stimulate the autonomic nervous system outside of nociception. These events, along with routine drug administration, can lead to undue consumption of morphinomimetics. The Nol index, a multiparametric monitor of nociception, is based on analysis of variations in plethysmography waveform, heart rate and skin conductance. It has been demonstrated that the use of this type of monitor can reduce intraoperative consumption of morphinomimetics and optimize their administration. Does intraoperative morphinomimetic administration optimized by the NOL index have an impact on the occurrence of dose-dependent adverse effects?

This study looks at how artificial intelligence (AI), like generative pre-trained transformer (GPT-4), can help doctors in the intensive care unit (ICU) save time and improve communication with families. Right now, doctors spend a lot of time writing notes after family conversations, which takes time away from patient care. The investigators are testing whether AI can create accurate and easy-to-understand summaries of these conversations, making it quicker for doctors to document and clearer for families to understand. ICU doctors and adult family members of patients will take part in this study, with their full consent. The goal is to see if this new technology can make life easier for doctors while helping families better understand medical information.