LARS - Low Anterior Resection Syndrome

The goal of this clinical study is to gain further insights into the treatment of patients with Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) symptoms after rectal resection. The main question is: Can LARS symptoms and quality of life be improved by implementing an intensified follow-up program? Researchers will compare the results of the intervention group with the results of a control group in which patients do not receive an intensified follow-up program to determine whether the intervention works. Participants will undergo an intensified follow-up program which consists of several follow-up visits and medical treatment, pelvic floor muscle training and gynaecological and urological co-treatment in case of LARS symptoms and urinary or sexual complaints.

Colorectal cancer is the 2nd and 3rd most common cancer in respectively women and men, of which about 40% is located in the rectum. The gold standard treatment for rectal cancer (RC) is a low anterior resection, combined with chemoradiotherapy. However, this treatment will negatively impact different aspects of bowel function and the patients' quality of life. These bowel symptoms often remain prevalent, even at 12 months after RC treatment. Most assessment tools are however not capable of capturing the full range or therapeutic-related evolution of these bowel symptoms. Consequently, the aim is to develop a validated bowel diary for diagnosing and evaluation of all bowel symptoms. In recent years, organ-preserving strategies such as Watch and Wait have become more widely implemented. Although these patients avoid surgical morbidity, emerging evidence shows that neoadjuvant radiotherapy alone can also cause substantial and persistent bowel dysfunction. Therefore, the study population was expanded to include patients managed with a Watch and Wait strategy in addition to those undergoing TME/PME.

Colorectal cancer is the 2nd and 3rd most common cancer in respectively women and men, of which about 40% is located in the rectum. The gold standard treatment for rectal cancer (RC) is a low anterior resection combined with chemoradiotherapy. However, this treatment negatively affects various aspects of bowel function and patients' quality of life. These bowel symptoms often remain prevalent, even 12 months after RC treatment. The aim of this study is to identify the factors contributing to persistent bowel symptoms and their long-term impact on quality of life following treatment for rectal cancer, assessed 12 months after surgery or stoma closure in surgically treated patients, and 12 months after completion of neoadjuvant therapy in patients managed with active surveillance/watch-and-wait. These insights are crucial for developing an effective care approach, as they help determine when specific evaluations should be conducted and which treatments should be applied at different stages.

OBJECTIVE Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) is a term for functional bowel complaints occurring after low anterior resection. Symptoms can range from faecal incontinence and frequent loose stools to urgency and incomplete emptying with great impact on quality of life. Little is known about the longitudinal evolution of LARS and the impact of different schedules of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy combined with surgery. The investigators aim to investigate the incidence and evolution of functional bowel complaints in function of different neoadjuvant treatment regimens, type of surgery and adjuvant therapy in patients who undergo surgery for rectal cancer. The investigators focus on following objectives: evolution of LARS- and COREFO-scores per treatment regimen and their impact on work incapacity; identification of possible risk factors potentially related to functional outcome; monitoring and treatment of LARS. METHODS This will be a multicentre prospective interventional study. The study population will consist of adult patients with rectal cancer, regardless of any neo-adjuvant therapy. Patients will be included for 5 years with a 2 year postoperative follow-up. Interim analysis will be made after 2 years of inclusion. Patients with intellectual disability or clinical colon obstruction are excluded. Automated online questionnaires including LARS and COREFO scores, incapacity for work and defecation quality will be sent at different time points (figure 1) using REDCap. RESULTS and CONCLUSIONS Longitudinal change of LARS- and COREFO-scores will be visually summarized. Patient, disease or procedure specific risk factors will be assessed as well. LARS is proven to be the principal postoperative problem after rectal surgery. If the investigators can predict the severity of LARS (minor or major LARS), this can be extremely helpful in deciding whether to perform a sphincter-sparing resection or a rectal amputation instead. Furthermore, the investigators want to offer perspective to patients who are susceptible to a disturbed postoperative bowel function.

Anterior rectal resection has become the primary surgical treatment for rectal cancer. However, studies have reported that up to 80%-90% of patients who undergo anterior rectal resection experience varying degrees of defecation dysfunction after surgery, such as frequent bowel movements, urgent bowel movements, and faecal incontinence, known as low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). This can lead to a decline in quality of life after surgery and even partial loss of social functioning.

This multicenter, randomized, controlled trial aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of thread embedding acupuncture (TEA) in promoting gastrointestinal recovery after laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. The primary outcome is the time to first flatus. Secondary outcomes include time to first defecation, tolerance to oral intake, length of hospital stay, and patient-reported quality of life.

The purpose of this post-market clinical follow up study is to assess the efficacy on clinical symptoms of LARS of low volume Transanal Irrigation by MiniGo in conjunction with conservative treatment versus conservative treatment at 3 months.

The main aim of this randomized study will be to determine the effectiveness of pelvic floor exercises on the incidence or severity of LAR syndrome in patients after mini-invasive rectal resection. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does pelvic floor exercise after low anterior resection prevent LARS (low anterior resection syndrome)? * What is the adherence of patients to prescribed home exercise after surgery? * Quality of life after LAR Researchers will compare the group of patients with pelvic floor exercises to those without and determine the occurrence and severity of LARS. Participants will: * under the professional guidance of a physiotherapist, the day before surgery and in the first 4 postoperative days be educated to exercise the pelvic floor * continue exercise at home for a month (according to the instructions together with the infographic)

Safety \& Efficacy of 5-HT3 Receptor Antagonist (Ramosetron) versus Loperamide for the Treatment of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (RALLARS): Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial