Liver Neoplasm

Major visceral oncologic surgery is associated with high postoperative morbidity, prolonged hospitalization, delayed recovery, and reduced quality of life. Patients undergoing surgery of the pancreas, liver, bile ducts, stomach, or esophagus frequently present with reduced physical fitness, malnutrition, sarcopenia, and psychological distress, all of which may negatively affect surgical outcomes and rehabilitation. Although prehabilitation has shown potential to improve functional capacity before surgery, structured prehabilitation pathways are currently not routinely implemented in Austria, and the feasibility of digitally supported perioperative care pathways remains insufficiently evaluated. The aim of the Prehab2Rehab-OncoVis study is to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and safety of a multimodal, digitally supported prehabilitation intervention for patients undergoing major visceral oncologic surgery with curative intent. The study will additionally explore potential effects on clinical recovery, functional capacity, rehabilitation outcomes, and patient-reported outcomes across the perioperative pathway. Prehab2Rehab-OncoVis is designed as a prospective, single-arm feasibility cohort study conducted at the University Hospital Salzburg and the University Institute of Sports Medicine, Prevention and Rehabilitation, coordinated by the Paracelsus Medical University in cooperation with the Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Rehabilitation Research and the Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Digital Health and Prevention within the Prehab2Rehab consortium. Approximately 30 adult patients, with the possibility to include up to 50 participants if feasible, will be consecutively recruited. The intervention consists of a four-week multimodal prehabilitation program combining supervised exercise training, promotion of physical activity, nutritional counseling, psycho-oncological distress screening, and health literacy support. Digital tools will support the intervention throughout the perioperative pathway, including the HERO application (Das Herz Reha-Informationstool) for patient education and health literacy, aktivplan as a digital exercise planner and training diary, and the CAATS telecommunication platform for remote supervision and tele-prehabilitation sessions where appropriate. The exercise intervention includes supervised center-based sessions and, for participants with longer travel distances, a hybrid model combining center-based and tele-prehabilitation sessions. Nutritional counseling will follow current European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) guidelines and includes screening for malnutrition risk. Psycho-oncological distress screening will follow recommendations of the German Cancer Society and includes referral to supportive care when clinically indicated. Participants will be assessed throughout the perioperative pathway, including at the beginning and end of prehabilitation (Prehabilitation Assessment 1 \[PRE1\] and Prehabilitation Assessment 2 \[PRE2\]), during hospitalization and rehabilitation, and at a three-month follow-up after surgery. Primary outcomes focus on feasibility, including recruitment and retention rates, adherence, fidelity, safety, data management feasibility, and acceptability and usability of the digital technologies. Secondary outcomes include clinical recovery indicators, postoperative complications, length of hospital and intensive care stay, functional independence, psychological well-being, quality of life, body composition, cardiorespiratory fitness, functional exercise capacity, and muscle strength. To contextualize outcomes, two historical comparator cohorts will be used: a local hospital cohort of patients who previously underwent similar surgery without prehabilitation, and a national rehabilitation cohort derived from routine rehabilitation datasets matched for diagnosis, sex, and age. The study is intended to generate feasibility data and preliminary estimates that may support the development of future adequately powered randomized controlled trials evaluating digitally supported prehabilitation and rehabilitation pathways in visceral oncologic surgery.

This multi-center, prospective observational study aims to develop and validate an interpretable prediction model for Myocardial Injury After Noncardiac Surgery (MINS) in patients undergoing major hepatobiliary surgery. The study adopts a nested modeling strategy, starting with baseline risk factors (e.g., RCRI) and stepwise incorporating hepatic inflow occlusion strategies (specifically comparing SPVO vs. Pringle maneuver) and routine intraoperative biomarkers. The model's performance will be evaluated using AUC, Net Reclassification Improvement (NRI), and Decision Curve Analysis (DCA), followed by interpretability analysis using SHAP values and external validation in an independent cohort.

This prospective clinical study will examine the ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) to assess the treatment response of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to transarterial radioembolization (TARE). HCC is the third leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide and the single fastest growing cause of cancer mortality in the United States. TARE is recommended for 15-25% of HCC patients. Treatment response is generally evaluated using contrast-enhanced CT or MRI 1-2 months and 4-6 months post-TARE. Although TARE is an effective therapy, assessment of treatment response using CT/MRI is challenging because CT/MRI frequently diagnoses tumor response as equivocal or non-progressing for up to 6 months post-TARE based on LI-RADS criteria. This delay in diagnosing tumor viability subsequently delays needed retreatment and can even serve as a barrier to transplantation. Our prior work in HCC locoregional therapy has shown CEUS provides improved sensitivity in detecting viable tumor following transarterial chemoembolization relative to traditional CT/MRI. Therefore, the investigators propose to evaluate both qualitative and quantitative CEUS as a tool for evaluating HCC post-TARE at similar time points of clinically recommended cross-sectional imaging, while also investigating the role of Kupffer phase imaging. The investigators plan to enroll a total of 30 patients scheduled for TARE of a treatment naïve HCC over an 18-month period, allowing for a minimum of 6 months follow up. Patients will undergo a CEUS examination within two weeks of their first two clinically indicated CT/MRI exams (obtained at Jefferson 1-2 months and 4-6 months post TARE). In patients retreated prior to their 4-6 month MRI, CEUS may also be performed in the absence of the MRI at this time point but prior to retreatment. Patients will be recruited across six major hospitals within the Jefferson Health Enterprise. Those eligible for participation will be identified by project co-investigators and contacted by the study coordinator to discuss participation and to explain the study. The patient will be given time to consider the risks and benefits of the study and ask questions about participation. If agreeable, the patient will then arrange with the project coordinator to come to Jefferson's center city campus to sign consent and take part in the research study.

This is an open-label, multi-center, Phase 1/2 clinical trial evaluating the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of ECT204, an investigational ARTEMIS® T-cell therapy, in adult subjects with GPC3-positive hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who have experienced disease progression on, or intolerance to, prior systemic therapy.

This observational study will investigate the properties of image files standardly collected during radiation therapy treatment in a cross-section of liver cancer patients who received stereotactic ablative body radiation therapy (SABR) after trans-catheter arterial chemo emobilisation (TACE). Specifically, it will determine whether the radio-opaque contrast agents in the image files can be detected by tumour-tracking software (KIM).

The purpose of this observational study is to employ single-cell multi-omics and spatial omics technologies to characterize the spatial and immune structures within the livers of patients with fatty liver, hepatic hemangioma, focal nodular hyperplasia, liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, and HBV infection. The primary questions it aims to address are: Investigate the mechanisms of liver degenerative changes during the processes of liver aging, fatty liver, HBV infection, liver fibrosis, and cirrhosis. Characterize the molecular features and cellular networks at different stages of liver degeneration and identify new targets and mechanisms for the cure of the aforementioned diseases. The study will collect peripheral blood and discarded liver tissue from patients with hepatic hemangioma, fatty liver, HBV infection, liver fibrosis, and cirrhosis who are undergoing hepatectomy or liver biopsy.

Microwave ablation is a minimally invasive technique whose planning relies on manufacturer tables derived from ex vivo models that do not account for patient or tumor-specific factors. In clinical practice, the actual ablation volume often differs from the planned volume due to liver characteristics, vascular proximity, and tumor biology. This study aims to assess the variability between ablation small axis during percutaneous microwave ablation of liver lesions. The influence of patient-related (fibrosis, steatosis, portal flow) and tumor-related factors (location, histology, prior treatment) will be evaluated. Small axis and volume will be compared with volumes measured on immediate post-procedural CT and on CT/MRI at 6-12 weeks, accounting for expected tissue shrinkage.

A total of 116 patients who meet the inclusion criteria and are chemotherapy-naïve for their metastatic disease, will be randomly assigned to either the treatment group (DEBIRI plus systemic chemotherapy) or the control group (systemic chemotherapy alone). After 4 cycles of chemotherapy and 2 cycles of DEBIRI, patient reassessment to evaluate treatment response, based on RECIST criteria, will be performed using MRI or CT scan within 1-3 months of treatment initiation. The feasibility of secondary tumor resection, as primary endpoint, will be reassessed at a three-month follow-up multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting, guided by established clinical guidelines.