Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OSCC)

This is a Phase II, single-centre, non-randomized, single-arm clinical trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant nivolumab therapy in adult participants with resectable, locoregionally advanced Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OSCC) tumors. Identification of predictive molecular biomarkers of tumor response to treatment will also be performed.

This is a multicenter, open-label, randomized phase III clinical trial evaluating perioperative treatment with sintilimab combined with chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma. Despite standard treatment with surgery followed by postoperative radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy, patients with locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma remain at high risk of recurrence or metastasis. Recent evidence, including results from the KEYNOTE-689 study, suggests that perioperative immunotherapy may improve survival outcomes, and this approach has been incorporated into NCCN guidelines. Combining immunotherapy with chemotherapy may further improve prognosis in this patient population. Eligible participants will be randomly assigned to either an experimental group or a control group. The experimental group will receive neoadjuvant sintilimab combined with chemotherapy followed by surgery and postoperative treatment based on pathological response. Patients with major pathological response (MPR) will receive adjuvant sintilimab, while patients without MPR will receive postoperative radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy combined with sintilimab. The control group will receive standard treatment consisting of surgery followed by postoperative radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy as clinically indicated. The primary objective of the study is to compare event-free survival between the two groups. Secondary objectives include overall survival, pathological response, safety, and treatment-related adverse events. The results of this study may help optimize perioperative treatment strategies and improve outcomes for patients with locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma.

This study employs a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) design. Patients diagnosed with oral cancer by the attending physician and who meet the inclusion criteria will be admitted to the study after receiving a full explanation of the study objectives, intervention methods, potential risks, and participant rights from the research team upon their stable transfer to the plastic surgery ward post-operation. Written consent will be obtained from the patient and/or their legally authorized representative after adequate informed consent has been provided, before they are enrolled in the study.

Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy can effectively increase the postoperative pathological complete response rate, improve the survival rate of patients, and reduce the risk of recurrence in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) plays a role in inhibiting the cancer-immune cycle by binding to negative regulatory factors of T cell activation such as PD-1 and B7.1. It has achieved good therapeutic effects in lung cancer, liver cancer and other cancers. Previous studies have shown that three cycles of PD-L1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy have satisfactory efficacy and safety in locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma. However, during the three-cycle treatment process, due to the accumulation of drug toxicity, patients' tolerance to adverse reactions decreases, increasing the risk of serious adverse events and psychological pressure on patients. Based on this, this study aims to explore the efficacy of two cycles of avelumab (PD-L1 inhibitor) combined with chemotherapy in locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma, to explore whether it can achieve the same efficacy as three cycles while shortening the treatment time, reduce the risk of serious adverse events, and further verify the efficacy and safety of PD-L1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma. This study uses the postoperative pathological complete response (PCR) rate as the primary outcome indicator, and the objective response rate (ORR), major pathological response (MPR) rate, 2-year disease-free survival (EFS) rate, and 2-year and 5-year overall survival (OS) rate as secondary outcome indicators to evaluate the efficacy and long-term survival impact.

A prospective collection of 35 cases was conducted at Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University. Patients diagnosed with locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma (LA-OSCC) or locally advanced oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LA-OPSCC) from April 2023 onward, who received two cycles of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (tislelizumab + paclitaxel + cisplatin/carboplatin) at our institution, were included. The study analyzed treatment safety, efficacy, tumor regression patterns, 2-year progression-free survival (PFS), and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the combination therapy of immunotherapy (Sintilimab) with targeted therapy (Cetuximab) as a possible treatment before and after surgery for locally advanced oral/pharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the survival outcomes, morbidity and cost-effectiveness of sentinel node biopsy versus limited elective neck dissection in node-negative early oral cancers. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Survival outcomes * Morbidity outcomes * Cost-effectiveness Participants will either undergo sentinel node biopsy followed by completion neck dissection if sentinel node is reported to be metastatic (SNB) or limited elective neck dissection where level IIb will be cleared only if level IIa is metastatic (limited END). The study will compare the outcomes in the two cohorts.

To investigate the safety and efficacy of low-dose radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy and immunotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), and to explore whether low-dose radiotherapy can induce cross-presentation of tumor-specific antigens, enhance lymphocyte infiltration into the tumor microenvironment, and thereby amplify tumor-specific immune responses, ultimately improving the therapeutic outcomes of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy.

In this study, participants will be randomly assigned to either the experimental group or the control group. The experimental group will first receive SBRT (6Gy\*3 fractions) to treat the primary tumor and metastatic lymph nodes. This will be followed by a combination of Toripalimab, Docetaxel, and Cisplatin for three cycles, every three weeks. The control group will receive the same combination of Toripalimab, Docetaxel, and Cisplatin for three cycles, every three weeks, but without SBRT. After the final round of chemotherapy, all participants will have imaging scans and, three weeks later, undergo surgery. After surgery, they may also receive additional radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy. Patients can also choose whether to continue treatment with Toripalimab after surgery.

The primary endpoint is the assessment of the clinical value of a novel high-resolution mobile PET-CT scanner for intraoperative margin assessment in oral squamous cell carcinoma, soft tissue sarcoma and osteosarcoma surgery. The predicted margin status will be correlated with the margin status determined with histopathology.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the combination therapy of immunotherapy (Tislelizumab), targeted therapy (Cetuximab), with chemotherapy (Cisplatin and Nab-paclitaxel) as a possible treatment before and after salvage surgery for locally recurrent oral/pharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. The combination of Tislelizumab，Cetuximab, Cisplatin and Nab-paclitaxel will be given prior to your surgery, while Tislelizumab and Cetuximab will be continued for approximately half a year after surgery.

The goal of this study is to retrospectively compare different types of free flaps to determine the most suitable free flap for functional reconstruction in oral squamous cell carcinoma patients following tumor resection. The main questions it aims to answer are: Do the clinical characteristics of the thoracodorsal artery perforator flap differ from those of other types of flaps? Does the thoracodorsal artery perforator flap result in better clinical outcomes compared to other types of flaps? After reconstruction with the thoracodorsal artery perforator flap, do patients have better quality of life, speech function and scar healing compared to other types of flaps? Investigators will retrospectively compare the thoracodorsal artery perforator flap with other types of flaps (such as the anterolateral thigh flap, forearm flap, latissimus dorsi flap and fibula flap) to explore the most suitable free flap for facial defect reconstruction in oral squamous cell carcinoma patients. Participants are oral squamous cell carcinoma patients who previously underwent facial defect reconstruction with different types of flaps. Participants have completed relevant questionnaires at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post-surgery. The data will be scored and assessed by the investigators.